Article

Name: The death of the reader, or the price of success: a case of double reference in fictional narrative

Authors: Oleg A. Kovalev

Altai State University, Barnaul, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Abstract:

This paper analyzes a group of literary and cinematic narratives where a protagonist’s success indirectly expresses authorial desire through the attribution of the author’s traits to the character. These are examined as instances of indirect reference. The works of Fyodor Dostoevsky, who frequently endowed his characters with authorial attributes, serve as a primary example. From “Poor Folk” to “The Brothers Karamazov,” he populated his works with characters who write, compose, and fantasize, thereby directly or indirectly reflecting on the writer’s craft. The analysis also extends to contemporary Russian novels, Mikhail Elizarov’s “The Librarian” and Alexei Salnikov’s “The Petrovs in the Flu and Around It” and “Indirectly,” with the plots exploring the fantasy of the heightened impact of the literature. In these works, the clearest markers of the hero’s success are the extreme effects their texts have on readers, listeners, or viewers (causing death, madness, etc.). These success stories are interpreted as the author’s symbolic crime and punishment. Situated within the historical professionalization of writing, these narratives manifest an implicit reflection on the creative profession. The analysis also covers films by directors like David Cronenberg, John Carpenter, and Michael Haneke, which feature a convergence of narrative and discourse levels. Figuratively, this authorial self-reflection is expressed through the motif of breaking the frame. Structurally, it ruptures the integrity of narrative levels, especially in texts-within-texts. This theme of artistic transgression, debated in the 19th century, is further traced in Nikolai Gogol’s “The Portrait” and Dostoevsky’s “Crime and Punishment.”

Keywords: indirect reference, success story, metatext, fictional narrative, narrative levels, frame, transgression

Bibliography:

Alyab’eva L. Literaturnaya professiya v Anglii v 16–19 vekakh [The literary pro-fession in England in the 16th–19th centuries]. Moscow, NLO, 2004, 400 p.

Berg M. Literaturokratiya [The power of literature]. Moscow, NLO, 2000, 352 p.

Cholet R. Introduction. In: Balzac. La Comédie humaine. V. Études de mœrs: Scènes de la vie de province. Scènes de la vie Parisienne. Paris, Gallimard, 1977, pp. 3–108.

Dobrolyubov N. A. Zabitye lyudi [Downtrodden people]. In: Dobrolyubov N. A. Lit-eraturnaya kritika: v 2 t. [Literary criticism: in 2 vols.]. Leningrad, Khudozh. lit., 1984, vol. 2, pp. 419–473.

Gogotishvili L. A. Nepryamoe govorenie [Indirect speaking]. Moscow, LRC Publish-ing House, 2006, 720 p.

Kovalev O. A. Tri ekfrasisa [Three ekphrasis]. Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal [Si-berian Journal of Philology]. 2008, no. 2, pp. 57–67.

Lotman Yu. M. Ob iskusstve [On art]. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo-SPb, 1998, 702 p.

Maksimov V. Antonen Arto, ego teatr i ego dvoynik [Antonin Artaud, his theater, and his double]. In: Arto A. Teatr i ego dvoynik [The theater and its doppelganger]. St. Petersburg, Simpozium, 2000, pp. 5–34.

Mikhaylovskiy N. K. Zhestokiy talant [A cruel talent]. In: Mihaylovskiy N. K. Stat’i o russkoy literature 19 – nachala 20 veka [Articles on Russian literature of the 19th and early 20th centuries]. Leningrad, Khudozh. lit., 1989, pp. 153–234.

Müller-Funk W. Zhestokost’. Istoriya nasiliya v kul’ture i sud’bakh chelovechestva [Cruelty. The history of violence in culture and the fate of humanity]. Moscow, AST, 2023, 416 p.

Steyerl H. Po tu storonu reprezentatsii. Esse 1999–2009 gg. [Beyond representa-tion. Essays from 1999–2009]. N. Novgorod, Krasnaya lastochka, 2021, 200 p.

Yampol’skiy M. Diskurs i povestvovanie [Discourse and narrative]. In: Yampol’skiy M. Yazyk – telo – sluchay: Kinematograf v poiskakh smysla [Language – Body – Case: Cinema in search of meaning]. Moscow, NLO, 2004, pp. 251–276.