|
|||||||||||||
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences |
|
||||||||||||
|
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Philology) | |
|
ArticleName: The image of the double in the novels “The Gray Suit” by Vasily Andreev and “Someone Else’s Life” by Elena Dolgopyat: exploring the issue of textual homonymy Authors: Maria A. Chernyak Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation In the section Study of literature
Abstract: The paper compares the novels “The Grey Suit” (1929) by Vasily Andreev and “Someone Else’s Life” (2012) by Elena Dolgopyat. Not only does this comparison enable exploring textual homonymy, a term introduced by Tomas Venclova to refer to the similarity of texts with distinct internal semiotic structures, but it also highlights the resemblance between the literary periods of the 1920s and 2020s. The works addressing the theme of duality were created with a time gap of almost a hundred years. The convergence of post-revolutionary literature and post-Soviet literature gives rise to a striking parallelism, as their texts harmoniously rhyme and weave together, forming a distinct fabric of literary context. The theme of duality, the un-solvable contradiction of human nature, and the subsequent transformation of this theme serve to establish a closer connection between the works of Andreev and Dolgopyat. The twin models serve as evident and prevalent frameworks of cultural self-awareness during various stages of its evolution. The paper indicates that Andreev and Dolgopyat are representative of the epochs characterized by literary collapse and transition. Through their works, the writers express their thoughts on both the duality of their contemporary reality and the universal concept of duality. Consequently, the paper presents evidence that Andreev’s narrative, which was “given back” to the reader in 1989 but has received minimal analysis, enriches the body of texts exploring the “Yesenin myth” and the concept of duality. Keywords: Russian prose of the 1920s, modern literature, Vas. Andreev, E. Dolgopyat, the double, transitional epochs, textual homonymy Bibliography: Bakhtin M. M. Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaya kul’tura srednevekov’ya i Renessansa [The work of François Rabelais and the popular culture of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance]. Moscow, Khudozh. lit., 1990, 543 p. Broytman S. N. O. Mandel’shtam. Ya ne slykhal rasskazov Ossiana [О. Mandelstam. I have not heard the stories of Ossian]. In: Poetika russkoy klassicheskoy i neklassicheskoy liriki [Poetics of Russian classical and non-classical lyrics]. Moscow, RSUH, 2008, pp. 298–310. Eko U. Innovatsiya i povtorenie: Mezhdu estetikoy moderna i postmoderna [Innovation and repetition: between modern and postmodern aesthetics]. In: Filosofiya epokhi postmoderna: Sb. perevodov i referatov [Philosophy of the postmodern era: a collection of translations and abstracts]. Minsk, 1996, pp. 68–70. Evlampiev I. I. Povest’ “Dvoynik” i metafizika “dvoynichestva” v tvorchestve F. Dostoevskogo [The story “The Double” and the metaphysics of “doubleness” in the work of F. Dostoevsky]. Solov’evskie issledovaniya. 2010, iss. 2 (26), pp. 4–17. Golubkov S. A. Sposoby realizatsii motiva mnimosti v russkoy proze 1920-kh godov [Ways of realising the imaginary motif in 1920s Russian prose]. Vestnik of Samara University. History, pedagogics, philology. 2016, no. 2. URL: https://cyber leninka.ru/article/n/sposoby-realizatsii-motiva-mnimosti-v-russkoy-proze-1920-h-godov (accessed 26.07.2023). Kovtun N. V. Trikster kak geroy nashego vremeni (Na materiale russkoy prozy vtoroy poloviny 20–21 veka) [The trickster as a hero of our time (on the material of Russian prose of the second half of the 20th–21st century)]. Moscow, FLINTA, Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V. P. Astafyev, 2022, 408 p. Leyderman N. L. Sovestnoy sud (o poeme S. Esenina “Chernyy chelovek”) [Conscientious judgement (about S. Esenin's poem “Black Man”)]. Philological Class. 2007, no. 17, pp. 70–73. Lotman Yu. M. O poetakh i poezii [About poets and poetry]. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo SPb, 1996, 848 p. Lotman Yu. M. Stat’i po semiotike i topologii kul’tury: izbrannye stat’i v trekh tomakh [Articles on semiotics and topology of culture: selected articles in three volumes]. Tallinn, 1992, vol. 1, 242 p. Nablyudatel’ iskazhennykh mirov: poetika i retseptsiya: sbornik statey [Observer of distorted worlds: poetics and reception: a collection of papers]. V. Ya. Malkina, S. P. Lavlinskiy (Comps., Eds.). Moscow, Editus, 2019, 286 p. Nasedkin V. Posledniy god Esenina [Yesenin’s last year]. In: S. A. Esenin. Materialy k biografii [S. A. Esenin. Materials for biograph]. Moscow, Istoricheskoe nasledie, 1992, pp. 233–234. Rizdvenko T. Popast’ v chuzhuyu zhizn’ [To step into someone else’s life]. Znamya. 2020, no. 8, pp. 211–212. Shubnikova-Guseva N. I. Poemy Esenina: ot “Proroka” do “Chernogo cheloveka”: Tvor. istoriya, sud'ba, kontekst i interpretatsiya [Yesenin’s poems: From “The Prophet” to “The Black Man”: Creative history, destiny, context and interpretation]. Moscow, IMLI RAN, Nasledie, 2001, 684 p. Sovremennaya proza glazami prozaikov. Materialy kruglogo stola [Modern prose through the eyes of prose writers. Round table materials]. Voprosy literatury. 1996, no. 1, pp. 41–42. Todorov Ts . Vvedenie v fantasticheskuyu literaturu [Introduction to the fantastic literature]. Moscow, 1997, 144 p. Toporov V. N. Vstupitel’noe slovo k “vtoroy proze” [An introduction to “second prose”]. In: “Vtoraya proza” / russkaya proza 20–30-kh gg. 20 v. [“Second prose”/ Russian prose of the 20–30s of the 20th century]. Editrice Universita degli Studi di Trento, kabirinti 18, Trento, 1995, pp. 17–22. Vulis A. Z. Literaturnye zerkala [Literary mirrors]. Moscow, Sov. pisatel’, 1991, 480 p. |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |