Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Philology)
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: The grammatical status of the synthetic marker of comparison -DAy in the Kazakh language

Authors: Saule Zh. Tazhibayeva, Irina A. Nevskaya, Anna V. Dybo

In the section On the 100th anniversary of the birth of Professor M. I. Cheremisina

Issue 3, 2024Pages 12-28
UDK: 811.512.1’366DOI: 10.17223/18137083/88/1

Abstract:

The paper defines the grammatical status of the Kazakh affix -DAy. It is an all-Turkic form grammaticalized relatively recently from a comparative postposition. In Turkic languages, postpositions have been identified as a recognized mechanism for the grammaticalization of novel case forms. Sometimes, the process of grammaticalization remains incomplete, with forms being produced that are often defined as case suffixes, derivational morphemes, or postposition affixes. The status of the affix -DAy/-DIy varies across Turkic languages and should be defined for each Turkic language individually. The turcological literature often debates its status, even within the same Turkic language. Our research focuses on analyzing the morphonological, morphosyntactic, and accentual characteristics of the -DAy form in the Kazakh language. The analysis based on different criteria has defined -DAy as a young equative-similative case morpheme. However, our experimental study has revealed variations in the accentual patterns of word forms with the affix -DAy in different Kazakh varieties, including the Standard Kazakh (the literary variant used in Kazakhstan) and those spoken in Mongolia and China. The variety spoken in Mongolia and China demonstrates a more pronounced grammaticalization of the affix -DAy as a case marker, compared to Standard Kazakh. None-theless, the distinctions are subtle and demand further exploration. Thus, the pace of grammaticalization processes differs even among local varieties of the same language. The use of experimental methods can provide clarity on the status of these entities.

Keywords: comparative constructions, marker of comparison, similative case, Kazakh language

Bibliography:

Akhmetzhanova Z. K. Funktsional’no-semanticheskie polya russkogo i kazakhskogo yazykov (opyt sopostavitel’nogo issledovaniya) [Functional-semantic fields of the Russian and Kazakh languages (a comparative research)]. Alma-Ata, Nauka, 1989, 108 p.

Andersen P. K. Word order typology and comparative constructions. Amsterdam [etc.], Benjamin’s, 1983, 245 p.

Cheremisina M. I. Sravnitel’nye konstruktsii russkogo yazyka [Comparative constructions in the Russian languages]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1976, 251 p.

Dixon R. M. W. Comparative constructions. Studies in Language. 2008, pp. 787–817.

Dmitriev N. K. Stroy tyurkskikh yazykov [Structure of Turkic languages]. Moscow, Vost. lit., 1962, 608 p.

Dybo A. V., Mal’tseva V. S., Sultrekova E. V., Sheymovich A. V., Krylov F. S. Struktura khakasskoy slovoformy i ogranicheniya na sochetaemost’ affiksov v avtomaticheskom parsere khakasskogo yazyka [The structure of Khakass wordforms and limitations on the combinability of affixes in the automatic parser of the Khakas language]. Ural-Altaic Studies. 2023, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 42–75.

Eskel’dieva B. E. Ekvativnye i similyativnye tipy – otnosheniya ravenstva v yazykakh raznykh sistem [Equative and similative types – relations of equality in languages of different systems]. Bulletin of the L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. 2016, no. 1 (110), pp. 220–225.

Fedina N. N., Koshkareva N. B., Plotnikov I. M. Sravnitel’nye konstruktsii s polifunktsional’noy leksemoy ush ‘kak; takoy zhe’ kak sredstvo formirovaniya obraznosti v chalkanskom fol’klore [Comparative constructions with the multifunctional lexeme ush ‘as; the same as’ as a means of forming figurativeness in Chalkan folklore]. Epic studies. 2023, no. 4, pp. 62–75. DOI 10.25587/2782-4861-2023-4-62-75

Grammatika sovremennogo literaturnogo altayskogo yazyka. Morfologiya [A Grammar of the contemporary literary Altay language. Morphology]. Nevskaya I. A. (Ed.). Gorno-Altaisk, Institute of Altaic Studies, 2017, 576 p.

Haspelmath M., Buchholz O. Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. In: Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. J. van der Auwera (Ed.). Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, 1998, pp. 277–334.

Isaev S. Iz istorii razvitiya poslelogov deyіn, sheyіn i affiksov -sha, -she, -day, -dey v kazakhskom yazyke [On the history of the formation of the postpositions deyin, sheyin and the affixes -sha, -she, -day, -dey in Kazakh]. In: Qazaq tili zhene edibieti meseleleri [Research on the Kazakh language and literature]. Alma-Ata, 1970, iss. 7, pp. 114–126.

Johanson L. Degrees of grammaticalisation of Kazakh nominal relators. Turkic Languages. 2015, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 156–163.

Konyrov T. Strukturno-semanticheskaya priroda sravneniya v kazakhskom yazyke (komparativnye konstruktsii) [Structural-semantic foundations of comparison in Kazakh (comparative constructions)]. Alma-Ata, Mektep, 1985, 215 p.

Koshkareva N. B., Plotnikov I. M. Metayazyk opisaniya semantiki sravneniya kak yazykovogo znaka [Metalingistic representation of the semantics of comparison as a linguistic sign]. Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics). 2023, no. 2, pp. 180–216. DOI 10.25205/2307-1753-2023-2-180-216

Melioranskiy P. M. Kratkaya grammatika kazak-kirgizskogo yazyka. Ch. I. Fonetika i etimologiya [Concise grammar of the Kazak-Kirgiz language. Pt. 1. Phonetics and etymology]. St. Petersburg, 1894, 179 p.

Mұsabaev Ғ. Ғ. Қazaқ tіlіndegі syn esіmnің shyraylary [Forms of adjectives in the Kazakh language]. Almaty, Қazaқ SSR-nyң Ғylym baspasy, 1951, 134 p.

Nevskaya I. A. Prostranstvennye otnosheniya v tyurkskikh yazykakh Yuzhnoy Sibiri (na materiale shorskogo yazyka) [Spatial relations in the Turkic languages of South Siberia (on the material of the Shor language)]. Novosibirsk, Nika, 2005, 305 p.

Nevskaya I. A. Spornye voprosy altayskoy grammatiki: o statuse formy na -DYy v altayskom literaturnom yazyke [On disputable issues of the Altai grammar: on the status of the form -DIy in the Altay literary language]. Russian Turkology. 2016, no. 1 (14), pp. 3–15.

Nevskaya I. A., Tazhibaeva S. Zh. Issledovanie sravnitel’nykh konstruktsiy v tyurkskikh yazykakh (sravnitel’no-sopostavitel’nyy aspekt) [Research on comparative constructions in Turkic languages (a comparative aspect)]. In: Predlozhenie kak edinitsa yazyka i rechi: Vseros. nauch. simpozium s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem [Sentence as a unit of language and speech: All-Russian scientific symposium with participation of foreign scholars]. Novosibirsk, Akademizdat, 2019, pp. 183–187.

Nevskaya I. А. Tipologicheskie osobennosti shorskikh ekvativnykh i similyativnykh konstruktsiy [Typological features of Shor equative and similative constructions]. Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Philology). 2022, no. 4, pp. 286–299. DOI 10.17223/18137083/81/22

Nevskaya I. Innovations and archaisms in Siberian Turkic spatial case paradigms. In: A Transeurasian historical and areal perspective Paradigm Change in the Trans-eurasian languages and beyond. M. Robbeets and W. Bisang (Eds.). John Benjamins, 2014, pp. 257–286.

Ozonova A. A. Sravnitel’naya polipredikativnaya konstruktsiya s poslelogom chylap/chilep ‘kak, kak budto’ v altayskom yazyke [Comparative polypredicative construction with the postposition chylap/chilep ‘as if’ in the Altai language]. Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Philology). 2023, no. 4, pp. 260–271. DOI 10.17223/18137083/85/19

Rassadin V. I. Morfologiya tofalarskogo yazyka v sravnitel’nom osveshchenii [Morphology of the Tofan language in a comparative perspective]. Moscow, Nauka, 1980, 288 p.

Similative and Equative Constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective. In: Typological Studies in Language 117. Y. Treis and M. Vanhove (Eds.). John Benjamins, 2017, 437 p.

Sovremennyy kazakhskiy yazyk [Contemporary Kazakh language]. Alma-Ata, AN Kaz. SSR., 1962, 392 p.

Stassen L. The Comparative Compared. Journal of Semantics. 1984, vol. 3, pp. 143–182.

Sultrekova (Kyrzhinakova) E. V. Sravnitel’nye konstruktsii khakasskogo yazyka [Comparative constructions in Khakas]. Abakan, Khakas. kn. Izd., 2017, 326 p.

Tybykova L. N. Sravnitel’nye konstruktsii altayskogo yazyka [Comparative constructions of the Altai lanugage]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Alma-Ata, 1989, 17 p. Ultan R. Some Features of Basic Comparative Constructions. Working Papers on Language Universals (Stanford). 1972, vol. 9, pp. 117–162.

Vasil’ev Yu. I. Sposoby vyrazheniya sravneniya v yakutskom yazyke [Means of expressing comparison in the Yakut language]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1986, 111 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology