Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Philology)
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: «The Double» of Dostoevsky and «The Double» of Akhsharumov: to the problem of stylistic organization of a secondary text

Authors: A. E. Kozlov

Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Issue 1, 2017Pages 36-45
UDK: 821.161.1+821.0+81’4DOI: 10.17223/18137083/58/4

Abstract: The paper compares the stylistic organization of Dostoevsky’s poem «The Double» (1846) and Akhsharumov’s eponymous tale «The Double» (1850) which were published in the «Native Notes» (Otechestvennye Zapiski). The investigation of the style of these texts shows some changes in classic literature canon influenced by the Pushkin style. It is studied in the context of literature evolution (Tyn’yanov, Vinogradov). «The Double» of Akhsharumov is a secondary text, but his stylistic organization has a character of compensation. We can call it a «return», a «recognition » of Pushkin’s canon through Gogol and Dostoevsky style being canceled. The Plot of «The Double» of Akhsharumov presents Dostoevsky story in the stylistic form of Pushkin «The Belkin Tales» and his other prose texts (notably «The Queen of Spades»). This observation suggests that the secondary text resulting from the aesthetic response to the original work often has a paradoxical extensive character of style in his nature, which allows maintaining the balance between archaists and innovators in the history of Russian culture.

Keywords: russian literature of xix century, dostoevsky, akhsharumov, stylistic organization, secondary text, secondary and alternative

Bibliography:

Akhsharumov N. D. Dvoynik [The Double]. In: Otechestvennye zapiski [Notes of the fatherland]. 1850, vol. 69, pp. 1–66.

Blok A. A. Strashnyy mir. Sobr. soch.: V 7 t. T. 3. [A terrible world. Collected works: in 7 vols. Vol. 3]. Moscow, Leningrad, 1962, pp. 7–62.

Dilaktorskaya O. G. Peterburgskaya povest’ Dostoevskogo [The Petersburg novel of Dostoevsky]. St. Petersburg, 1999, 350 p.

Dostoevskiy F. M. Dvoynik. Priklyucheniya gospodina Golyadkina [The Double. Adventures of Mr. Goliadkin]. In: Otechestvennye zapiski [Notes of the fatherland]. 1846, vol. 44, pp. 263–428.

Fanger D. Dostoevsky and romantic realism: A study of Dostoevsky in relation to Balzac, Dickens and Gogol. Cambridge, 1965, 207 p.

Kazakov A. A. Tsennostnaya arkhitektonika proizvedeniy Dostoevskogo [Axiological architectonics of the Dostoevsky prose]. Tomsk, TSU Publ. House, 2012, 253 p.

Kozlov A. E. K voprosu o literaturnoy reputatsii N. D. Akhsharumova [On Nikolai Akhsharumov’s Literary Reputation]. Siberian philological journal. 2015, no. 1, pp. 30–35.

Lavrova S. Yu. Yazykovaya lichnost’ N. D. Akhsharumova v semioticheskom prostranstve russkoy literatury vtoroy poloviny XIX veka (k postanovke problemy) [Language Worldview of N. D. Aksharumov in semiotic space of Russian literature of 2nd part of XIX century]. Cherepovets State University Bulletin, 2015, no. 4, pp. 100–107.

Mayorova O. E. Akhsharumov Nikolay Dmitrievich [Nikolay Dmitrievich Aksharumov]. In: Russkie pisateli. 1800–1917: Biograficheskiy slovar’ [Russian writers. 1800–1917. Biographical Dictionary]. Moscow, 1989, pp. 131–132.

Pecherskaya T. I. Poetika povestey F.M. Dostoevskogo 1840–1860-kh gg [Poetics of the novels of Dostoevsky of 1840–1860]. Abstract of Philol. Cand. Diss. Tomsk, 1989, 16 p.

Polknovnikova N. V. Motiv igry v povesti N. D. Akhsharumova “Dvoynik” [The game motif in the novel “Dvoynik” of N. D. Aksharumov]. Izvestiya Penzenskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V. G. Belinskogo. 2012, no. 27, pp. 368–372.

Slovar’ yazyka Dostoevskogo. Idioglossariy: Г–З. Pod red. Yu. N. Karaulova [Dictionary of Dostoevsky discourse: Г–З]. Yu. N. Karaulov (Ed.). Moscow, Azbukovnik, 2010, 847 p.

Sorokin Vl. Biograficheskiy ocherk [A biographical essay]. In: Sochineniya N. D. Akhsharumova [Collected works of N. D. Aksharumov]. St. Petersburg, 1894, vol. 1, pp. 2 – 11.

Tynyanov Yu. N. Poetika. Istoriya literatury. Kino [Poetics. Theory of Literature and Cinema]. Moscow, 1977, 576 p.

Vinogradov V. V. K morfologii natural’nogo stilya: (Opyt lingvisticheskogo analiza peterburgskoy poemy “Dvoynik”) [Morphology of the natural school style: (Experience of a linguistic analysis of the Petersburg poem “The Double”)]. In: Poetika russkoy literatury: Izbrannye trudy [Poetics of Russian literature: collected works]. Moscow, 1976, pp. 101–140.

Vinogradov V. V. Stil’ “Pikovoy damy” [Style of the “Pikovaya dama”]. In: Pushkin: Vremennik Pushkinskoy komissii [Bulletin of the Pushkin researches]. Moscow, Leningrad, USSR Acad. of Sciences Publ. House, 1936, pp. 74–147.

Zakharov V. N. Sistema zhanrov Dostoevskogo. Tipologiya i poetika [System of genres of the Dostoevsky prose. Typology and Poetics]. Leningrad, 1985, 209 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology