![]() |
|
||||||||||||
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences |
|
||||||||||||
|
![]() | |
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Philology) | |
![]() |
|
Article
Authors: Boldyrev Boris Vasilievich Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation In the section Linguistics
Abstract: The paper substantiates the proposal that the Tungusic languages belong to the languages of the nominative-possessive structure. The attributive possessive relations and predicative relations are the grammatical essence of the syntactic structure of these languages. The distinction between attributivity and predicativity lies not only in the fact that the attributive relations can exist within the constituents of the phrase being able to be an independent sentence constituent but not a completed sentence while the predicative relations characterize the binding between the main parts of the sentence forming a completed sentence. The attributive and predicative syntagmas differ as far as the forms of their expression are concerned: the former is represented by a possessive paradigm where the first component is expressed by a caseless form of a possessive pronoun or an adjective formed as a result of conversion and the second component of the attributive syntagma is expressed by a word of the noun class the possessive suffix of which shows the person and number of the first component of the attributive syntagma. Another paradigm is a predicative one represented by the main parts of the sentence: the subject expressed by a word of the noun class in the nominative case and the verbal or nominal predicate having personal markers showing the person and number of the subject of action. Keywords: nominative-possessive structure, possessive syntagma, predicative syntagma, sentence Bibliography: |
![]() |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |