Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Philology)
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Structural features of existential sentences in Old Turkic and in South Siberian Turkic languages in a comparative perspective

Authors: Irina A. Nevskaya

Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 1, 2026Pages 192-209
UDK: 811.512.16DOI: 10.17223/18137083/94/14

Abstract:

A comparative analysis of the structural features of existential nominal sentences in Old Turkic and modern South Siberian Turkic languages is presented. A deep structural affinity is posited between these stages of the language, identifying unique developments in copula selection, subject agreement strategies, and the expression of negation and Tense-Aspect-Mood (TAM) categories. In these nominal sentences, the predicate is expressed by a nominal, requiring an existential copula to mark non-present TAM categories. This copula agrees with the subject in person and number (for first and second persons). For third-person subjects, agreement is primarily in person, with less consistent agreement in number. While Old Turkic relied heavily on the nowlost copula är- (“to be”), modern Siberian languages have introduced positional verbs (e.g., lexical “lie”) into the copula inventory—a feature absent in Old Turkic. The research further distinguishes the present tense marking strategies: Altai Turkic relies on the grammatical subject, Khakass and Shor utilize synthesized or cliticized personal pronouns, and Old Turkic and Tuvan employ personal pronouns following the predicate without phonetic transformation. Applied to the copula verb before TAM markers, the verbal negation affixes -mA/-BA denote entity absence irrespective of temporal aspect. Of significance is the persistence of the nominal predicates var/bar/par (“existence”) and yok/d’oq/čoq (“non-existence”). Unlike Modern Turkish, Old Turkic and South Siberian languages retain these nominals in past and future contexts rather than replace them with purely verbal copulas. Finally, the study notes that existential copulas remain essential for embedding nominal sentences as dependent clauses within complex constructions.

Keywords: Old Turkic language, South Siberian Turkic languages, existential sentences, copula verbs

Bibliography:

Arutyunova N. D. Predlozhenie i ego smysl (logiko-semanticheskie problemy) [The sentence and its semantics (logical and semantic isues)]. Moscow, 1976, 383p.

Cheremisina M. I., Ozonova A. A. Sintaksis tyurkskikh yazykov Yuzhnoy Sibiri. Prostoe predlozhenie: Ucheb. posobie [Syntax of the Turkic languages of Southern Siberia. Simple sentence: Textbook]. Novosibirsk, 2005, 165 p.

Cheremisina M. I. O teoreticheskikh voprosakh model’nogo opisaniya predlozheniy [On theoretical issues of describing sentences using patterns (models)]. In Predlozhenie v yazykakh Sibiri [Sentence in the languages of Siberia]. Novosibirsk, 1989, pp. 3–18.

Cheremisina M. I. Struktura i tipologiya imennykh predlozheniy [Structure and typology of nominal sentences]. Humanitarian sciences in Siberia. 1998, no. 4, pp. 96–104.

Chispiyakov E. F. Uchebnik shorskogo yazyka: Posobie dlya prepodavateley i studentov [A textbook of the Shor language: A guide for teachers and students]. Kemerovo, 1992, 60 p.

Dankoff R., Kelly J. Maḥmūd al-Kāšġarī, 1982–1985. Compendium of the Turkic dialects (Dīwān Luγat at-Turk) 1–3. (Turkish Sources 7.) Harvard, Harvard Uni. Press, 1982, vol. 1, 416 p.; 1984, vol. 2, 381 p.; 1985, vol. 3, 337 p.

Dryer M. S. Clause types. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description. T. Shopen (Ed.). Cambridge, 2007, vol. 1: Clause Structure, pp. 224–275.

Dyrenkova N. P. Grammatika shorskogo yazyka [Grammar of the Shor language]. Moscow, Leningrad, 1941, 306 p.

Erdal M. A grammar of Old Turkic. Leiden & Boston, Brill, 2004, 575 p.

Fedina N. N. Ob imennykh skazuemykh v chalkanskom yazyke [On nominal predicates in Chalkan]. Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal [Siberian Journal of Philology]. 2014, vol. 2, pp. 181–188.

Grammatika khakasskogo yazyka [Grammar of the Khakass language]. N. A. Baskakov (Ed.). Moscow, Nauka, 1975, 418 p.

Grammatika sovremennogo altayskogo yazyka. Morfologiya [Grammar of the modern Altai language. Morphology]. I. A. Nevskaya (Ed.). Gorno-Altaysk, 2017, 576 p.

Hengeveld K. Non-verbal Predication: Theory, Typology, Diachrony. Berlin, New-York, 1992, 344 p. (Functional Grammar Series 15)

Iskhakov F. G., Pal’mbakh A. A. Grammatika tuvinskogo yazyka. Fonetika i morfologiya [The Grammar of the Tuvan language. Phonetics and morphology]. Moscow, 1961, 472 p.

Koshkareva N. B. Metod modelirovaniya struktury i semantiki elementarnogo prostogo predlozheniya kak edinitsy yazyka [Methods of modelling the structure and semantics of the elementary simple sentence as a language sign]. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. Novosibirsk, 2006, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 64–75.

Koshkareva N. B. Tipovye sintaksicheskie struktury i ikh semantika v ural’skikh yazykakh Sibiri. [Typical syntactic structures and their semantics in Uralic languages in Siberia]. Dr. philol. sci. diss. Novosibirsk, 2007, 387 p.

Nevskaya I. A., Ozonova A. A. Opyt sostavleniya ankety po imennym predlozheniyam v yuzhnosibirskikh tyurkskikh yazykakh i pervye rezul’taty ee primeneniya [Attempt of the questionnaire on the nominal sentences in the South-Siberian Turkic languages and the first results]. Ural-Altaic Studies. 2019, no. 34 (3), pp. 84–123.

Nevskaya I. A. Prostranstvennye otnosheniya v tyurkskikh yazykakh Yuzhnoy Sibiri (na materiale shorskogo yazyka) [Spacial relations in Turkic languages of Southern Siberia (on the material of the Shor language)]. Novosibirsk, 2005, 304 p.

Nevskaya I. A. Tipologiya lokativnykh konstruktsiy v tyurkskikh yazykakh Yuzhnoy Sibiri (na materiale shorskogo yazyka) [Typology of spatial constructions in Turkic languages of Southern Siberia]. Dr. of art sci. diss. Novosibirsk, 1997, 198 p.

Ozonova A. A., Tazranova A. R., Fedina N. N. Altayskiy yazyk i ego dialekty v materialakh V. V. Radlova [Altai language and Altai dialects in materials collected by V. V. Radlov]. Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal [Siberian Journal of Philology]. 2018, no. 1, pp. 235–249.

Petrushova M. B. Kratkaya grammatika kumandinskogo yazyka [A concise grammar of the Kumandin language]. Novosibirsk, 2005, 112 p.

Röhrborn K. Uigurisches Wörterbuch. Sprachmaterial der vorislamischen türkischen Texte aus Zentralasien. I. Verben, Neubearbeitung. Stuttgart, Steiner Verlag, 2010, Bd. 1: ab- – äzüglä-, 213 p.

Roy I. Nonverbal Predication: Copular Sentences at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Oxford, 2013, 230 p.

Sereedar N. Ch., Skribnik E. K., Cheremisina M. I. Strukturno-semanticheskaya organizatsiya predlozheniy nalichiya, lokalizatsii, kolichestva i otsutstviya v tyurkskikh yazykakh Yuzhnoy Sibiri: Ucheb. posobie [A structural and and semantic organization of sentences of presence, location, quantity, and absence in the Turkic languages of Southern Siberia: Textbook]. Novosibirsk, 1996, 82 p. Stassen L. Intransitive predication. Oxford, 1997, 792 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology