![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences |
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Philology) | |
|
Article
Authors: Sergey M. Shavrygin Moscow Financial and Industrial University “Synergy”, Moscow, Russian Federation In the section Study of literature
Abstract: This study considers the importance of cognitive methods in analyzing the plot foundations of literary texts, revealing the mechanisms of knowledge conceptualization within a plot-cognitive matrix. The analysis of the short story “Oskolok l’du” (“A fragment of ice”) written by Vladimir Dahl demonstrates that examination of plot-event concepts can improve cognitive scenario studies. It is demonstrated how Dahl uses documentary accounts (such as notes by Russian prisoners) and personal correspondence (letters to friends) as a referential basis for this work, creating numerous thematic and situational resonances. The writer constructs an original version of an “abductively reversible” story matrix of the “journey” type, in which event concepts, situational scenes, and plot motifs are uniquely organized, forming a double plot matrix comprising five distinct stages (frames). The dominant concepts within each frame dictate the implementation of the cognitive scenario of the text. Their nominative structure is linked to specific semantic fields, including both lexical meanings and linguo-cultural associations, which become the interpretative basis of the cognitive plot matrix. Ultimately, the plot matrix represents a synergy between the mental processing of real events and the “fairy-tale matrix” as a universal narrative structure. The conceptual sphere of a literary text becomes the basis of architectonics, and the cognitive-conceptual plot matrix is a set and sequence of nominative fields of artistic concepts. Keywords: plot, story, novella, concept, conceptosphere, matrix, scene, scenario, frame, V. I. Dahl Bibliography: Alpatova T. A. Misteriya ognya i l’da v tvorchestve V. I. Dalya: (k analizu rasskaza “Oskolok l’du”) [The Mystery of fire and ice in the works of V. I. Dal: (to the analysis of the story “A Splinter of Ice”)]. In Istoriya russkoy literatury: sovremennost’ klassiki: sbornik k yubileyu professora S. A. Dzhanumova [History of Russian literature: the modernity of classics: Collection dedicated to the anniversary of Prof. S. A. Dzhanumov]. Moscow, MSPU, 2017, pp. 105–113. Andreyeva E. A. “Preniya o vere” kak syuzhetoobrazuyushchiy topos v zhitiyakh knyazey-muchenikov epokhi tataro-mongol’skogo iga [“Debate about faith” as a plot-forming topos in the hagiograhy of princes-martyrs of the Tatar Mongol yoke’s epoch]. In Germenevtika drevnerusskoy literatury: Sbornik 19 [Hermeneutics of Old Russian Literature: Issue 19]. Moscow, IWL RAS, 2020, pp. 485–497. Belousov K. I. Teoriya i metodologiya polistrukturnogo sinteza teksta: monografiya [Theory and methodology of polystructural text synthesis: monograph]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka, 2009, 216 p. Boyarskaya E. L. Integrativnyy podkhod k analizu sobytiynogo freyma [An integrative approach to event frame analysis]. IKBFU’s Vestnik. Series: Philology, pedagogy, and psychology. 2017, no. 3, pp. 5–13. Dement’yev V. V. Teoriya rechevykh zhanrov [Theory of speech genres]. Moscow, Znak, 2010, 594 p. Esalnek A. Ya. Teoriya literatury: Ucheb. posobie. [Literary theory: Textbook]. 3rd ed., ster. Moscow, Flinta, 2021, 208 p. Karasik V. I. Vosstaniye: Interpretativnaya matritsa syuzheta [Rebellion: Interpretive Plot Matrix]. Language and Culture. 2020, no. 50, pp. 41–56. Karasik V. I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Moscow, Gnozis, 2004, 389 p. Kruchinkina N. D. Kognitivnyy i yazykovoy aspekty formirovaniya sobytiynykh kontseptov [Cognitive and linguistic aspects of the formation of event concepts]. IKB-FU’s Vestnik. Series: Philology, pedagogy, and psychology. 2010, no. 2, pp. 27–32. Lakoff Dzh., Dzhonson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem [Metaphors we live by]. Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2004, 256 p. Levitan L. S., Tsilevich L. M. Syuzhet v khudozhestvennoy sisteme literaturnogo proizvedeniya [Plot in the artistic system of a literary work]. Riga, Zinatne, 1990, 512 p. Maslov E. S. Vremya v narrative: “fabula-syuzhet” i “istoriya-diskurs” vs semioticheskiy treugol’nik [Time in narrative: “plot-plot” and “history-discourse” vs. the semiotic triangle]. Studia Litterarum, 2023, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 10–27. Matviyevskaya G. P. Dal’ v orenburgskom vostokovedenii [Dahl in Orenburg oriental studies]. 2021. URL: https://www.zhurmir.ru/sites/zhurmir/files/pdf/gd_2021-19_-_324.pdf (accessed 21.01.2024). Milovanova M. V., Kulichenko Yu. N. Kognitivnyy stsenariy kak sposob opisaniya mimicheskogo vyrazheniya emotsional’nogo sostoyaniya sub”yekta [Cognitive script as a way of describing the facial expression of the emotional state of the subject]. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics. 2012, no. 1 (15), pp. 108–113. Ogneva E. A. Arkhitektonika tekstovogo kognitivnogo stsenariya v interpretativnom pole perevoda [Architectonics of the textual cognitive scenario in the interpretative field of translation]. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics. 2015, no. 2 (043), pp. 61–70. Ogneva E. A., Kuz’minykh Yu. A. Arkhitektonika tekstovoy kognitivnoy stseny: problemy modelirovaniya i interpretatsii [Architectonics of the textual cognitive scene: problems of modeling and interpretation]. Moscow, Editus, 2014, 202 p. Paducheva E. V. Vyskazyvaniye i yego sootnesennost’ s deystvitel’nost’yu: Referentsial’nyye aspekty semantiki mestoimeniy [The statement and its correlation with reality: Referential aspects of the semantics of pronouns]. Moscow, LKI, 2010, 296 p. Propp V. Ya. Morfologiya skazki [Morphology of the fairy tale]. Moscow, Gl. red. vost. lit., 1969, 168 p. Silant’yev I. Syuzhet i smysl [Plot and meaning]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 2018, 142 p. Sozina E. K. Diskurs “stepnykh plennikov” v russkoy literature 19 veka [The discourse of “steppe captives” in Russian literature of the 19th century]. Ural Historical Journal. 2016, no. 1 (50), pp. 6–15. Tyupa V. I. Analiz khudozhestvennogo teksta [Analysis of a literary text]. 3rd ed., ster. Moscow, Akademiya, 2009, 336 p. Yusupova M. S. Kognitivnyy stsenariy v khudozhestvennom tekste [Cognitive script in fiction]. Molodoy uchenyy. 2021, no. 13 (355), pp. 80–83. |
![]() |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |