Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Philology)
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: The prose poem: genre originality, plot and motive repertoire

Authors: Elena N. Proskurina

Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section On the 100th anniversary of the birth of Viktor Georgievich Odinokov, corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Education

Issue 2, 2024Pages 46-58
UDK: 82DOI: 10.17223/18137083/87/5

Abstract:

The research focuses on the prose writings of Russian literature, referred to as “poems” by the writers themselves. The analysis covers a collection that is both compact in number and extensive in terms of time, from “Dead Souls” by N. V. Gogol to “Moscow and Petushki” by Ven. Erofeev. Two characteristics uniting all the works under analysis should be noted. First, all the writings, though having diverse plots, share the epic nature and metaphysical scale of the theme (unique for every writer). Second, a common leitmotif that can be determined as longing for an ideal makes the epic form sound lyrical. It is not the ideal that is emphasized but the longing that translates the external description into an internal action of the character, unfolding from the self to the outside, all this being a characteristic of the lyrical plot. The writers construct their narrative by employing the primary motif of longing for an ideal and its various iterations. They bring forth the poetic essence of these moments portraying life in its highest moments according to the laws governing poetry. The highest moments may appear at opposite poles, such as the rapture of life/love or the rapture of despair/fever of the suffering soul. This research uncovers the motif nests that add a semantic tension, reinforcing the emotional power of the central leitmotif: love/hate towards existence, longing for the ideal, and despair towards the imperfection of the world and man. The prose statement becomes more poetic, shifting towards a high genre.

Keywords: Russian literature of the 19th–20th centuries, prose poem, epic, lyric, genre, motif

Bibliography:

Belinskiy V. G. Pokhozhdeniya Chichikova, ili Mertvyye dushi. Poema N. Gogolya (1842) [The adventures of Chichikov, or Dead Souls. A poem by N. Gogol (1842)]. URL: http://feb-web.ru/feb/gogol/critics/grk/grk2112-.htm (accessed 11.11.2023)

Chumakov Yu. N. V storonu liricheskogo syuzheta [Lyrical plot aside]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 2010, 87 p.

Gogol’ N. V. Sobr. soch.: V 14 t. [Collected works: In 14 vols.]. Moscow, AN SSSR, 1952, vol. 11, 484 p.

Gor’kiy M. Poln. sobr. soch.: V 25 t. [Complete collected works: In 25 vols.]. Moscow, Nauka, 1970, vol. 6, 581 p.

Gusev V. I. Poryv k vysokomu. Zametki na temu “Gogol’ i romantizm” [An impulse to the high. Notes on “Gogol and Romanticism”]. In: Gogol’: Istoriya i sovremennost’ [Gogol: history and modernity]. Moscow, Sov. Rossiya, 1985, pp. 333–338.

Davydova T. T. Antizhanry v tvorchestve E. Zamyatina [Anti-genres in the works of E. Zamyatin]. In: Novoye o Zamyatine. Sb. materialov [New about Zamyatin. Collection of materials]. Moscow, 1997, pp. 20–35.

Dostoevskiy F. M. Poln. sobr. soch.: V 30 t. [Complete works: In 30 vols.]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1976, vol. 14, 510 p.

Dragomiretskaya N. V. Stilevyye iskaniya v ranney sovetskoy proze [Style searches in early Soviet prose]. In: Teoriya literatury. Osnovnyye problemy v istoricheskom osveshchenii [Theory of Literature. The main problems in historical illumination]. Moscow, Nauka, 1965, bk. 3, pp. 125–173.

Khryashcheva N. P. “Kipyashchaya vselennaya” Andreya Platonova (Dinamika obrazotvorchestva i miropostizheniya v sochineniyakh 20-kh godov) [“Boiling universe” by Andrei Platonov (Dynamics of imagery and worldview in the works of the 20s)]. Yekaterinburg, Sterlitamak, SSPU, 1998, 323 p. (in Russ.)

Leyderman N. L. Krovavyy karnaval. “Poemy v proze” 1920-kh godov: poetika i semantika [Bloody Carnival. “Poems in prose” of the 1920s: poetics and semantics]. Voprosy literatury. 2008, September-October, pp. 241–267.

Leyderman N. L. Problema zhanra v modernizme i avangarde (Ispytaniye zhanra ili ispytaniye zhanrom?) [The Problem of Genre in Modernism and Avant-Garde (Testing the Genre or Testing the Genre?)]. In: Russkaya literatura 20–21 vekov: napravleniya i techeniya [Russian literature of the 20th–21st centuries: directions and currents]. Ekaterinburg, UrSPU, 2006, iss. 9. pp. 3–33. (in Russ.)

Losev A. F. Dialektika mifa [Dialectics of myth]. URL: http://psylib.org.ua/books/ losew03/txt05.htm (accessed 25.11.2023).

Makarenko A. S. Sobr. soch.: V 4 t. [Collected works: In 4 vols.]. Moscow, Pravda, 1987, vol. 1, 575 p.

Mann Yu. Poetika Gogolya [The Gogol’s poetics]. Moscow, Khudozh. lit., 1978, 398 p. (in Russ.)

Mann Yu. Dinamika russkogo romantizma [The dynamics of Russian romanticism]. Moscow, Aspekt Press, 1995, 384 p.

Mazanaev Sh. A., Khalikova U. Kh. Poema Venedikta Erofeeva “Moskva – Petushki” kak burleskno-travestiynaya parodiya [Venedikt Erofeev’s poem “Moscow – Petushki” as a burlesque and travelling parody]. Herald of Dagestan State University. Series 2. The Humanities. 2017, vol. 32, iss. 1, pp. 68–73.

Michurin I. V. Itogi shestidesyatiletnikh trudov po vyvedeniyu novykh sortov plodovykh rasteniy [Results of sixty years of work on the development of new varieties of fruit plants]. 3rd ed. Moscow, Sel’khozgiz, 1934, 367 p.

Pasternak B. Soch.: V 2 t. [Works: In 2 vols.]. Tula, Filin, 1993, vol. 1, 382 p.

Platonov A. Soch. Nauchnoe izdanie [Works. Scientific edition]. Moscow, IWL RAS, 2004, vol. I, bk. 1: Rasskazy. Stikhotvoreniya [Stories. Poems], 644 p.; T. 1, kn. 2: Stat’i. 1918–1927 [Articles. 1918v1927], 510 p.

Platonov A. “…ya prozhil zhizn’” (Pis’ma 1920–1950 gg.]) [“...I have lived life” (Letters 1920–1950)]. Moscow, Astrel’, 2013, 685 p.

Proskurina E. N., Borisova A. B. Osobennosti utopicheskogo soznaniya A. Platonova v rasskaze “Zhazhda Nishchego”: zhanr, syuzhet, geroy [Features of A. Platonov’s utopian consciousness in the story “The Beggar’s Thirst”: genre, plot, hero]. Ural Historical Journal. 2019, no. 2, pp. 22–30.

Proskurina E. N. M. Gor’kiy v tvorcheskom soznanii A. Platonova [M. Gorky in the creative mind of A. Platonov]. Studies in Theory of Literary Plot and Narratology. 2023, no. 2, pp. 17–29. DOI 10.25205/2713-3133-2023-2-17-29

Proskurina E. N., Proskurina-Yanovich P. V. “Shinel’” Gogolya: pritcha v oblich’e anekdota [Gogol’s “Overcoat”: parable in the guise of anecdote]. In: Pritcha v russkoy slovesnosti: ot Srednevekov’ya k sovremennosti [Parable in Russian literature: from the Middle Ages to the present]. Novosibirsk, NSU Publ., 2014, pp. 269–279.

Russkaya literatura XX v. Prozaiki. Poety. Dramaturgi: Bibliograficheskiy slovar’: V 3 t. [Russian literature of the twentieth century. Prose writers. Poets. Play-wrights: bibliographical dictionary: In 3 vols.]. Moscow, OLMA – PRESS, 2005, vol. 2, 719 p.

Shmid V. Proza kak poeziya. Pushkin, Dostoyevskiy, Chekhov, avangard [Prose as poetry. Pushkin, Dostoevsky, Chekhov, avant-garde]. St. Petersburg, INAPRESS, 1998, 352 p. (in Russ.)

Stepanov N. L. Povest’ N. V. Gogolya “Taras Bul’ba” [N. V. Gogol’s story “Taras Bulba”]. In: Gogol N. V. Taras Bulba [Taras Bul’ba]. Moscow, AN SSSR, 1963, pp. 153–181. (in Russ.)

Voronskiy A. Iskusstvo videt’ mir (Portrety. Stat’i) [The art of seeing the world (Portraits. Articles)]. Moscow, Sov. pisatel’, 1987, 702 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology