Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Philology)
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: The fight with the dragon in “The Prince Archilabon’s Story”: literary sources, folk tradition and its modernization

Authors: L. A. Kurysheva

Institute of Philology SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Issue 3, 2020Pages 50-65
UDK: 821.161.1, 82-31, 398-22DOI: 10.17223/18137083/72/4

Abstract: This paper is concerned with reconstructing the reader’s experience of P. S. Orlov, which influenced his plan for The Prince Archilabon’s Story (1750), and analyzing the plot about fighting the dragon in this fiction in the aspect of modernization and resemantization of epic motifs. In episodes of the hero’s fight with the dragon and the adventures with the lions, the direct sources of the Story are the works of old tradition close to folklore forms – The Yeruslan Lazarevich’s Tale, The Brunzwick’s Tale, The Bova Prince’s Tale. Several details indicate that the author was familiar with the living epic tradition. The ethos of the protagonist and his horse in the episode of the heroic deed (the Dragon-Slayer) was rethought in P. S. Orlov’s Story. Unlike the epic model, the hero is encouraged to exploit the horse, the horse itself appears first as an instrument of providence, then as a comrade-in-arms subordinate to the hero, without anthropomorphic features, but spiritually connected with the owner. The epic opponent (dragon) retains external attributes in the Story (locus of habitat, appear-ance, course of the battle), in the course of the story, loses its chthonic essence (enemy and sink) and turns into the giver and potential assistant of the protagonist. After changing their usual location in the composition, separate epic motifs lose their initial semantics, while another group of epic motifs (falling a horse to its knees, driving a horse into the ground) is reinterpreted or gets an additional explanation.

Keywords: Russian literature of the 17th–18th centuries, handwritten fiction, the Dragon-Slayer, ATU 300, folklore and literature

Bibliography:

Adon’eva S. B. Osobennosti struktury i semantiki zmeeborcheskogo syuzheta v fol’klore i pis’mennoy traditsii [Features of the structure and semantics of the snake-fighting plot in folklore and written tradition]. In: Russkiy fol’klor [Russian folklore]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1989, vol. 25, pp. 100–111.

Astakhova A. M. K voprosu ob otrazheniyakh v russkom bylinnom epose skazaniya o Eruslane [On the issue of reflections in the Russian epic of the Yeruslan’s story]. In: Trudy otdela drevnerusskoy literatury [Transactions of the Department of Old Russian literature]. Moscow, Leningrad, AN SSSR, 1958, vol. 14, pp. 504–509.

Astahova A. M., Mitrofanova V. V. Kommentarii [Comments]. In: Byliny v zapi- syah i pereskazah 17–18 vekov [Epics in the records and retellings of the 17th–18th centuries]. A. M. Astakhova, V. V. Mitrofanova, M. O. Skripil’ (Prep. of the edition). Moscow, Leningrad, AN SSSR, 1960, pp. 255–304.

Demkova N. S., Likhachev D. S., Panchenko A. M. Osnovnye napravleniya v bel- letristike 17 veka [Main trends in fiction of the 17th century]. In: Istoki russkoy belletristiki: Vozniknovenie zhanrov syuzhetnogo povestvovaniya v drevnerusskoy liter-ature: Sb. st. [Origins of Russian fiction: Appearence of storytelling genres in Old Rus-sian literature: Coll. of art.]. Ya. S. Lur’e (Ed. in Ch.). Leningrad, Nauka, 1970, pp. 476–561.

Evgen’eva A. P., Putilov B. N. Kommentariy [Comment]. In: Drevnie rossiyskie sti- khotvoreniya, sobrannye Kirsheyu Danilovym [Ancient Russian poems collected by Kirshey Danilov]. A. P. Evgen’eva (Prep. of the edition), 2nd ed. rev. Moscow, Nauka, 1977, pp. 425–460.

Kuz’mina V. D. Rytsarskiy roman na Rusi (Bova, Petr Zlatykh Klyuchey) [Chivalric romancein Russia. (Bova, Peter of the Golden Keys)]. Moscow, Nauka, 1964, 342 p.

Kurysheva L. A. Ob avtore rukopisnoy “Gistorii korolevicha Arkhilabona” (1750) [About the author of the handwritten “The Prince Archilobon’s Story” (1750)]. Siberian Journal of Philology. 2017, no. 2, pp. 28–42.

Kurysheva L. A. Syuzhet o kovarnoy sestre v “Gistorii korolevicha Arkhilabona” [The plot of the insidious sister in “The Prince Archilobon’s Story”]. In: Krugi vremen. V pamyat’ Eleny Konstantinovny Romodanovskoy [Circles of time. In memory of Elena Konstantinovna Romodanovskaya]. Moscow, Indrik, 2015, vol. 2, pp. 528–532.

Meletinskiy E. M. Vvedenie v istoricheskuyu poetiku eposa i romana [Introduction to the historical poetics of the epic and the novel]. Moscow, Nauka. Gl. red. vost. lit., 1986, 320 p.

Melikhov M. V. Transformatsiya realiy Petrovskoy epokhi v demokraticheskoy literature 18 v. [Transformation of the realities of the Petrine era in the democratic literature of the 18th century]. Cherepovets State University Bulletin. 2012, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 99–102.

Miller Or. Il’ya Muromets i bogatyrstvo kievskoe [Ilya Muromets and heroism of Kiev]. St. Petersburg, 1869, 895 p.

Neklyudov S. Yu. Traditsii ustnoy i knizhnoy kul’tury [Traditions of oral and book culture]. In: Slovo ustnoe i slovo knizhnoe [Oral word and book word]. M. A. Gister (Comp.). Moscow, RSUH Publ., 2009, pp. 15–33.

(Seriya “Tradi tsiya – tekst – fol’klor: tipologiya i semiotika” [Series “Tradition - text - folklore: typology and semiotics”])

Propp V. Ya. Istoricheskie korni volshebnoy skazki [The historical roots of a fairy tale]. St. Petersburg, SPbU Publ., 1996, 365 p.

Putilov B. N. Geroicheskiy epos i deystvitel’nost’ [Heroic epic and reality]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1988, 244 p.

Putilov B. N. Russkiy i yuzhnoslavyanskiy geroicheskiy epos: Sravnitel’no-tipologicheskoe issledovanie [Russian and South Slavic heroic epic: Comparative-typological study]. Moscow, Nauka, 1971, 316 p.

Pushkarev L. N. Skazka o Eruslane Lazareviche [The Tale of Yeruslan Lazarevich]. Moscow, Nauka, 1980, 184 p.

Smirnov Yu. I., Smolitskiy V. G. Primechaniya [Notes]. In: Dobrynya Nikitich i Ale- sha Popovich [Dobrynya Nikitich and Alyosha Popovich]. Yu. I. Smirnov, V. G. Smo- litskiy (Prep. of the Ed.). Moscow, Nauka, 1974, pp. 371–431.

Smolitskiy V. G. Bylina o Dobryne i zmee [Bylina about Dobryn and the Dragon]. In: Russkiy fol’klor. Iz istorii russkoy narodnoy poezii [Russian folklore. From the histo-ry of Russian folk poetry]. Leningrad, 1971, vol. 12, pp. 181–192.

Sravnitel’nyy ukazatel’ syuzhetov. Vostochno-slavyanskaya skazka [Comparative index of plots. Eastern Slavonic fairy tale]. L. G. Barag, I. P. Berezovskiy, K. P. Kabash- nikov, N. V. Novikov (Comps). Leningrad, Nauka, 1979, 437 p.

Zolotova T. A. Zmeeborchestvo v russkoy skazke i byline (sravnitel’nyy analiz) [Snake slaying in Russian tale and epic: (comparative analysis)]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Lomonosov Moscow State University. Moscow, 1983, 16 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology