Article

Name: Constructions denoting alternatives and preferences in the Altai language

Authors: A. A. Ozonova

Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Abstract: The paper is devoted to the description of the syntactic constructions denoting alternatives in the Altai language. Two semantic types of such constructions are distinguished: constructions denoting alternatives and constructions denoting preferences. In the alternative denoting constructions, the action in the main clause does not correspond to the speaker’s expectations; in the preference denoting constructions, the action in the main clause is preferable compared to the action in the subordinate clause. The contrast is revealed through the comparison of two actions. The participial-postpositional construction with the postposition ордына ‘instead’ is used for the first type, and the four adverbial participial constructions with the form with =ганча denote the second type. Three of these constructions contain three components, with the rejected situation being represented by the =ганча adverbial participle, and the preferred situation as a conditional one; the main clause is a positive predicate артык ‘better’ or торт ‘better.’ In contrast to the participial-postpositional construction with the postposition ордына, these constructions contain the evaluating components. The predicate of the main clause with ордына may only function as an indicative, and the predicate of the main clause of the construction with =ганча may be used in indicative, imperative, conjunctive, and other modal forms.

Keywords: Turkic languages, Altai language, complex sentence, semantic relations in com- plex sentence, denoting alternatives constructions, preferences constructions, alternatives (sugges- tions and rejections)

Bibliography:

Arutyunova N. D. Tipy yazykovykh znacheniy. Otsenka. Sobytie. Fakt [Types of linguistic meanings. Evaluation. Event. Fact]. Moscow, Nauka, 1988.

Burkova S. I. Zamestitel’nye konstruktsii v nenetskom yazyke [Replacement constructions in the Nenets language]. Yazyki korennykh narodov Sibiri. Novosibirsk, 2003, iss. 11, pp. 137–161.

Cheremisina M. I., Brodskaya L. M., Gorelova L. M., et al. Predikativnoe sklonenie prichastiy v altaiskikh yazykakh [Predicative declension of participles in Altai languages]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1984, 191 p.

Orkina L. N. Aspektual’no-temporal’naya kharakteristika vyskazyvaniy s semantikoy obuslovlennosti v sovremennom russkom yazyke [Aspectual-temporal characteristic of sentences with the semantics of conditioning in modern Russian]. Abstract of Dr. philol. sci. diss. St. Petersburg, 2000.

Russkaya grammatika. T. 2. Sintaksis [Russian Grammar. Vol. 2. Syntax]. N. Yu. Shvedova (Ed.). Moscow, Nauka, 1980.

Shamina L. A. Polipredikativnyye sinteticheskiye predlozheniya v tuvinskom yazyke [Polypredicative synthetic sentences in the Tuva language]. Novosibirsk, Sibirskiy khronograf, 2001, 250 p.

Skribnik E. K., Darzhayeva N. B. Buryatskie konstruktsii sopostavleniya-predpochteniya [Buryat constructions denoting alternatives and preferences]. Siberian Journal of Philology. 2016, no. 3, pp. 263–280.

Tybykova A. T., Cheremisina M. I., Tybykova L. N. Sintaksis oslozhnennogo predlozheniya v altayskom yazyke [Syntax of a complicated sentence in the Altai language]. Gorno-Altaysk, RIO Gorno-Alt. univ., 2013, 268 p.