Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Philology)
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: The vision of Peter Artemiev from his letter to his father and its role in the text structure

Authors: Tamara V. Panich

Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Issue 4, 2018Pages 37-46
UDK: 821.161.1DOI: 10.17223/18137083/65/4

Abstract: The paper examines the eschatological vision of Peter Artemiyev, the author who lived in the second half of the seventeenth century, presented in the part of his letter to his father from Moscow to Suzdal. The analysis was made of the letter duplicate preserved in the only copy in the draft manuscript of the late seventeenth century from the Synodic collection of SHM, no. 393. This letter is of a high scientific value as a source of biographical information about the writer and his literary masterpieces, combining the traditions of Old Russian booklore and cultural innovations of the second half of seventeenth century. In the letter structure, a special place takes the story of his own visionary experience (hell vision) that is related to the early period of life. The study deals with the content and system of characters of the vision, defines its structural specificity, establishes the connection between the vision and letter context, and determines its function in the compositional structure of the work. By its content, the vision described by Peter Artemiev is close to the type of visionary genre where the otherworld themes were developed. The text of the vision reflects the complex of author’s representations that were formed by the booklore influence, especially the texts with eschatological content. Among the topoi of the visionary genre used by the author, a special role plays the image of «paper scroll» where the sacred knowledge about some part of the otherworld is imprinted. This image can be definitely correlated with the Old Covenant storyline concerning the calling of prophet Ezekiel (Ez 2: 1–10; 3: 1–11). The connection of vision with Bible theme might have defined the character and conceptual orientation of its interpretation by the author himself. In total, the eschatological motifs and characters used by Peter Artemiev, according to his interpretation, have highlighted in the letter context such aspects of vision as pointing at chosenness and reminder of retribution for the sinner. The text analysis shows that the vision of Peter Artemiev, the content of which is closely connected with the letter context, had a significant influence on the author’s image and manner of self-expression. It made the confessional basis of the essay stronger and expanded its semantic range. In the narration, one can trace the individual features of the author, the elements of psychological self-analysis. Since Peter Artemiev vision is included in the letter structure, it helped him to disclose his writer's talent, demonstrate the individuality and authors self-consciousness.

Keywords: XVII century, Peter Artemiev, letter, hell vision, eschatology, author’s image

Bibliography:

D’yachenko G. Polnyy tserkovno-slavyanskiy slovar’ [Complete church-Slavic dictionary]. Moscow, 1900, 1120 p.

Kagan M. D. Petr Artem’ev. In: Slovar’ knizhnikov i knizhnosti Drevney Rusi. Vyp. 3: XVII v., ch. 3 [Dictionary of scribes and bookishness of Ancient Russia. Iss. 3: 17th century, pt 3]. St. Petersburg, 1998, pp. 32–34.

Kniga glagolemaya Prokhladnyy Vertograd: Lechebnik patriarshego keleynika Filagriya [The Book named Fresh Garden: patriarchal cell-attendant Philagros’ book of home cures]. Comp., foreword, entry art., transl., comm. by T. A. Isachenko, Moscow, 1997, 412 p.

Lakhtin M. Yu. Starinnye pamyatniki pis’mennosti [Ancient literary texts]. Moscow, 1912, 178 p. (Zap. Mosk. Arkheologicheskogo in-ta; T. 17 [Notes of Moscow Archeological Inst., Vol. 17]).

Nikol’skiy M. Russkie vykhodtsy iz zagranichnykh shkol v XVII stoletii. Petr Artem’ev [Russians immigrants from foreign schools in 17th century. Petr Artem’yev]. In: Pravoslavnoe obozrenie [Orthodox review]. Moscow, 1863, vol. 10, pp. 246–270.

Panich T. V. “Napisanie k sovetnikam” Afanasiya Kholmogorskogo: Materialy k biografii Petra Artem’eva [“A letter to the advisers” by Afanasiy Kholmogorskiy: Materials for the biography of Petr Artem’yev]. In: Gumanitarnye nauki v Sibiri. Seriya: Otechestvennaya istoriya [Humanities in Siberia. Series: National history]. Novosibirsk, 1999, no. 2, pp. 40–43.

Panich T. V. Artem’ev Petr. In: Pravoslavnaya entsiklopediya [Orthodox encyclopedia]. Moscow, 2001, vol. 3, pp. 467–468.

Panich T. V. Poslanie Petra Artem’eva ottsu v Suzdal’ [A letter to the father to Suzdal from Petr Artem’yev]. In: Pamyatniki otechestvennoy knizhnosti: novye teksty, novye interpretatsii [The monuments of national booklore: new texts, new interpretations]. Novosibirsk, 2007, pp. 166–186.

Panich T. V. Kompleks rukopisnykh materialov, svyazannykh s delami Petra Artem’eva i Grigoriya Skibinskogo (Tekstologicheskie nablyudeniya) [A complex of manuscripts connected to the cases of Petr Artem’yev and Grigoriy Skibinskiy (Textological observations)]. In: Obshchestvennoe soznanie i literatura Rossii: istochniki i issledovaniya [Social conscience and Russian literature: sources and research]. Novosibirsk, 2008, pp. 30–53.

Panchenko A. M. Russkaya stikhotvornaya kul’tura XVII veka [Russian poetry culture of 17th century]. Leningrad, 1973, p. 278.

Pigin A. V. Videniya potustoronnego mira v russkoy rukopisnoy knizhnosti [The vision of otherworld in Russian manuscript booklore]. St. Petersburg, 2006, p. 428.

Prokof’ev N. I. Videnie kak zhanr v drevnerusskoy literature [Vision as a genre in Old Russian literature]. Uchen. zap. Mosk. gos. ped. in-ta. 1964, vol. 231, pp. 35–56.

Protas’eva T. N. Opisanie rukopisey Sinodal’nogo sobraniya (ne voshedshikh v opisanie A. V. Gorskogo i K. I. Nevostrueva) [The description of Synodic assembly manuscripts (not included into the description of A. V. Gorskiy and K. I. Nevstruev)]. Moscow, 1973, pt 2, p. 163.

Romodanovskaya E. K. Rasskazy sibirskikh krest’yan o videniyakh (K voprosu o spetsifike zhanra videniy) [Siberian peasants’ stories about visions (To the specificity of visions genre)]. In: Trudy Otdela drevnerusskoy literatury. T. 49 [Proceedings of the Department of Old Russian literature. Vol. 49]. St. Petersburg, 1996, pp. 141–156.

Titov A. A. Letopis’ Dvinskaya [Dvinskaya chronicle]. Moscow, 1889, p. 182.

Yarkho B. I. Iz knigi “Srednevekovye latinskie videniya” [From “Middle Ages Latin Visions]. In: Vostok – Zapad: Issledovaniya. Perevody. Publikacii [East – West: Research. Translations. Publications]. Moscow, 1989, pp. 21–55.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology