Article

Name: The author and the hero in the aesthetic reality of the novel «Model» by N. D. Akhsharumov

Authors: A. E. Kozlov

Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Abstract: The paper is devoted to the investigation of plot and narration features of the novel «Model» («Naturshchitsa») of Nikolai Dmitrievich Akhsharumov. The novel was published in the «Otechestvennye zapiski» in 1866. Nikolai Dmitrievich Akhsharumov was a critic, writer and editor of some Russian magazines. Traditionally attributed to antinigilistic prose, the «Model» was practically not noticed in Russian literary criticism. The interpretation of the plot techniques used in the novel can be considered as a lacuna in the history of Russian fiction. At the same time, the text under study is a vivid example of exposure of the reception and open literary reflection: in the plot, not only the author and the hero collide, but also the hedonic and pragmatic aspects of creativity that are ethically connected with the idea of the author’s responsibility to his hero are considered. Of importance is the fact that the story of Akhsharumov appeared in one year with the «Crime and Punishment» by F. M. Dostoevsky – a polyphonic novel, in which the relations of the author and the hero are most problematized (M. M. Bakhtin). This work considers the criticism of Grigory Zakharovich Eliseev, who tried to discredit Dostoevsky’s novel by comparing it with Akhsharumov’s story. The way of reading offered by the critic is profoundly polemical and, of course, does not exhaust the interpretation potential of Akhsharumov’s story. In addition, the plot of the story, built on the situation of the duel between the author and the hero, largely anticipates the key conflict of the novel «The Precipice» by I. A. Goncharov. Being familiar with N. D. Akhsharumov (the author of the «Model» left the critical analysis of the masterpieces «Oblomov», considering it from an aesthetic standpoint and abandoning social determinism in the spirit of N. A. Dobrolyubov), I. A. Goncharov could also know his concept of «enslaved art». In any case, between the collisions of the novel «The Precipice» (Raisky-author and Raisky-hero, Raisky-author and Volokhov-hero, Raisky-author and Vera-model) and the story «Model», a typological relationship is seen. In conclusion, the historical and literary reputation of Akhsharumov as a writer-novelist is summed up. The tendentious perception of the story «Model» was due to the position of the writer, gravitating toward conservative circles, standing aside from literary battles and polemic. In other words, the writer’s name lacked the significance of the «symbolic capital» proper. Considering the work from the point of view of the plot and story organization, the researcher comes to the conclusion about the experimental nature of the story, which in part anticipates the major discoveries of Russian classics and the Russian modernist novel.

Keywords: N. D. Akhsharumov, author and hero, Russian literature of the 19th century, fiction, literature reputation, secondary and alternative

Bibliography:

Akhsharumov N. D. Igrok [The player]. Otechestvennye zapiski. 1858, no. 11–12.

Akhsharumov N. D. O poraboshchenii iskusstva [The enslavement of art]. Otechestvennye zapiski. 1858, no. 7.v

Akhsharumov N. D. Naturshchitsa. Yuridicheskaya fiktsiya [The model. Legal fiction]. St. Petersburg, izd. N. F. Merttsa, 1895, 105 p.

Bakhtin M. M. Avtor i geroy. K filosofskim osnovam gumanitarnykh nauk [The author and the hero. To the philosophical foundations of the humanities]. St. Petersburg, Academia, 2000, 300 p.

Brumfild U. Sotsial’nyy proekt v russkoy literature XIX veka [Social project in the Russian literature of 19th century]. Moscow, Tri kvadrata, 2009, 272 p.

Chernov A. V. Russkaya belletristika 20–40-kh godov XIX veka: Voprosy genezi-sa, estetiki i poetiki [Russian fiction of 20-40 years of 19th century. Issues of genesis, esthetics and poetics]. Cherepovets, Cherepovets univ. publ., 1997, 284 p.

Chukovskiy K. I. Lyudi i knigi shestidesyatykh godov [Society and books of the sixties]. Leningrad, Izd. pisateley, 1934, 310 p.

[Eliseev G. Z.] Russkaya literatura. Zhurnalistika [Russian literature. Journalism]. Sovremennik. 1866, no 2, pp. 33–45.

Kiseleva L. N. Roman kak vozmozhnaya/ideal’naya model’ avtobiografii [Novel as potential model of fiction/idealistic autobiography]. Semiotika povedeniya i literaturnye strategii: Lotmanovskie chteniya – XXII [Semiotics of behavior and literary strategies: Lotman’s readings – XXII]. Moscow, 2017, pp. 240–255.

Kozlov A. E. K voprosu o literaturnoy reputatsii N. D. Akhsharumova [On Nikolai Aksharumov’s literature reputation]. Siberian Philological Journal. 2015, no. 1, 30–35.

Lavrova S. Yu. Yazykovaya lichnost’ N. D. Akhsharumova v semioticheskom prostranstve russkoy literatury vtoroy poloviny XIX veka (k postanovke problemy) [Linguistic personality of N. D. Akhsharumov in semiotic space of Russian literature of the second part of the 19th century]. Cherepovets State Univ. Bulletin. 2015, no. 4, pp. 100–107.

Mayorova O. E. Akhsharumov Nikolay Dmitrievich. In: Russkie pisateli. 1800–1917: Biograficheskiy slovar’ [Russian writers. 1800–1917: Biogr. dict.]. Moscow, 1989, pp. 131–132.

Maroshi V. V. Imya avtora v russkoy literature: Poeticheskaya semantika, pragmatika, etimologiya: V 3 ch. [Author’s name in the Russian literature: semantic, pragmatic and etymological aspects: In 3 vols]. Novosibirsk, NGPU, 2013.

Matveenko I. A. Tipologicheskie skhozhdeniya romanov N. D. Akhsharumova “Kontsy v vodu’” i U. Kollinza “Zhenshchina v belom” [Typological similarities of the novel “Nobody was any the wiser” by N. D. Akhsharumov and the Novel “The woman in white” by W. W. Collins]. Siberian Philological Journal. 2014, no. 1, pp. 80–87.

N. N. Nyneshnyaya lyubov’ vo Frantsii: Obozrenie inostrannoy literatury, uchenye novosti i raznye izvestiya [Current love in France: Review of foreign literature, scientific and various news]. Otechestvennye zapiski. 1859, no. 3, pp. 1–28.

Slovar’ russkogo yazyka: V 4 t. [Academic dictionary of Russian language: In 4 vols]. A. P. Evgen’eva (Ed.). Moscow, Rus. yaz., 1999, vol. 2: K–O.

Paperno I. Semiotika povedeniya: Nikolay Chernyshevskiy – chelovek epokhi realizma [Semiotics of behaviour: Nikolai Chernyshevskiy as man of era of realism]. Moscow, NLO, 1996, 208 p.

Pecherskaya T. I. “Sapogi v kvadrate”: sapozhnyy syuzhet v russkoy literature 1840–1870-khgodov [“Boots squared”: shoe story in Russian literature of the 1840–1870s]. Syuzhetologiya i syuzhetografiya. 2014, no. 1, pp. 38–49.

Pecherskaya T. I. Predmet kak syuzhetnyy marker: sapogi v russkoy literature 1840–1870-kh godov [Subject as plot marking: shoe story in Russian literature of the 1840–1870s]. Siberian Philological Journal. 2014, no. 1, pp. 86–93.

Starygina N. N. Russkiy roman v situatsii filosofsko-religioznoy polemiki 1860–1870-kh godov [Russian novel in situation of philosophical and religious polemics of the 1840–1870s]. Moscow, LRC Publ. House, 2003, 352 p.

Turgenev I. S. Otcy i deti [Fathers and sons]. In: Poln. sobr. soch.: V 30 t. [Collected works: In 30 vols]. Moscow, Nauka, 1980, vol. 7.

Shklovskiy V. B. O teorii prozy [Theory of prose]. St. Petersburg, 1995, 384 p.

Shmid V. Narratologiya [Narratology]. Moscow, LRC Publ. House, 2003, 312 p.

Volodina N. V. N. D. Akhsharumov kak literaturnyy kritik: metodologicheskiy aspect [Akhsharumov as literature critic: aspect of methodology]. Cherepovetskie nauchnye chteniya – 2016: Materialy Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf.: V 3 ch. [Cherepovets scientific readings – 2016: Proceedings of the All-Russian scientific-practical conf.: In 3 pts]. Cherepovets, 2017, pp. 23–24.

Zubkov K. Yu. “Antinigilisticheskiy roman” kak polemicheskiy konstrukt radikal’noy kritiki [Anti-nihilistic novel’ as the radical criticism’s polemical construct]. Moscow State Univ. Bulletin. Series 9. Philology. 2015, no. 4, pp. 122–140.