Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737
Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics)
По-русски
Archive
Submission requirements
Process for Submission and Publication
Editor′s office
Editorial Board and Editorial Council
Our ethical principles
Search:


Email: silantev@post.nsu.ru

Article

Name: Semiotics of Cinema in the Novel “The Mirror” by Irina Odoevtseva

Authors: Anna A. Arustamova, Alexander V. Markov

Perm State University, Perm, Russian Federation; Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russian Federation

Issue 1, 2025Pages 307-327
UDK: 82.0+791.43.01+7.01+168.522DOI: 10.25205/2307-1753-2025-1-307-327

Abstract:

In Irina Odoevtseva’s prose fiction the cinematograph appears as a border art, scary as the world of similarities, but at the same time characterizing both modernity and the current state of the world novel. The analysis of the corpus of her prose fiction indicates the persistence of a number of motifs associated with the cinematograph: untrue light, false love, and the ambiguous state of emotions. A detailed analysis of her novel The Mirror (1939) shows that cinema is understood as an international art that differently draws the boundaries between one’s own and another’s, between cultural and social worlds, as an art that reclaims existential angst in an age of blurring boundaries between estates and cultures. Odoevtseva, relying partly on the achievements of Zinaida Gippius’s prose and thought, forms a special construction of a movie within a movie, of a mirror within a mirror, of the characters’ turnover. Consideration of the novel in the context of the culture of the time allowed us to identify numerous references by Odoevtseva to Russian literature of the nineteenth century: to the novels of Lermontov, Goncharov, and Tolstoy. Odoevtseva not only finds existential problems in Russian literature, but also incorporates into it the problem of the genuine and the non-genuine, reality and falsity. The world of cinematography turns out to be the world of flatness, the world of puppets and artificial bodies, while the filmmaking is juxtaposed with werewolfism. Odoevtseva, who began as a ballad poet, reproduces the motif complexes of Zhukovsky’s most famous ballads. In doing so, she not only provides a cross-section of contemporary life with this novel, but also maintains her own literary reputation. In the end, her novel clarifies whether Russian emigration is alive in the state of constant existential struggle facing the entire Western world.

Keywords: Russian emigration, Parisian note, Irina Odoevtseva, film history, literature and cinema, semiotics of cinema, screen medium, ballad, modernist novel

Bibliography:

Bobrova E. I. Irina Odoevtseva: poet, prozaik, memuarist: literaturnyi portret [Irina Odoevtseva: poet, prose writer, memoirist: a literary portrait]. Moscow, Nasledie Publ., 1995, 156 p. (in Russ.)

Chekalov K. A. Populyarno o populyarnoi literature. Gaston Leru i massovoe chtenie vo Frantsii v period “prekrasnoi epokhi” [Popularly about Popular Literature. Gaston Leroux and Mass Reading in France during the “Belle Epoque”]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2018, 288 p. (in Russ.)

Fedunina O. V. Ot “Sobytiya” A. P. Chekhova k “Otkrytiyu” Z. N. Gippius (k voprosu o zhanrovoi evolyutsii rasskaza) [From the “Event” by A. P. Chekhov to the “Discovery” by Z. N. Gippius (on the issue of the genre evolution of the story)]. Russica Romana, 2020, vol. 27, pp. 43–52. (in Russ.)

Galtsova E. D. Na grani syurrealizma. Franko-russkie literaturnye vstrechi: Zhorzh Batay, Irina Odoevtseva i Georgiy Ivanov [On the verge of surrealism. Franco-Russian literary meetings: Georges Bataille, Irina Odoevtseva and Georgy Ivanov]. In: Syurrealizm i avangard [Surrealism and avant-garde]. Moscow, 1999, pp. 105–126. (in Russ.)

Gippius Z. N. I zveri [And the animals]. Tropinka [Path], 1912, no. 7, pp. 87–96. (in Russ.)

Goncharov I. A. Complete works and letters. In 20 vols. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 2004, vol. 7, 779 p. (in Russ.)

Hollier D. Krovavye voskresen'ya [Bloody Sundays]. In: Tanatografiya Erosa: Zhorzh Batay i frantsuzskaya mysl' serediny 20 veka [Thanatography of Eros: Georges Bataille and French Thought of the Mid-Twentieth Century]. St. Petersburg, Mithril Publ., 1994, pp. 175–192. (in Russ.)

Kolotaev V. A. Dramaturgicheskii konflikt: vnutrennee protivorechie kak proektsiya deistviya v igrovom kino [Dramatic Conflict: Internal Contradiction as a Projection of Action in Feature Films]. Artikult, 2022, no. 1 (45), pp. 68–74. (in Russ.)

Kolotaev V. A. Estetika otchuzhdeniya: konstruirovanie novogo cheloveka sredstvami sovetskogo kinoiskusstva [Aesthetics of Alienation: Construction of a New Human Being by Means of Soviet Cinematography]. Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series: Literary Criticism. Linguistics. Cultural Studies, 2018, no. 8-2 (41), pp. 231–249. (in Russ.)

Kolotaev V. A., Ulybina E. V. Varianty preobrazovaniya fenomena very v nespravedlivyi mir v kinematografe [Variants of Transformation of the Phenomenon of Faith in an Unjust World in Cinema]. Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series: Philosophy. Sociology. Art Criticism, 2017, no. 2 (8), pp. 91–106. (in Russ.)

Koptelova N. G. Retsenziya D. V. Filosofova na mkhatovskuyu postanovku “Dyadi Vani” A. P. Chekhova (1901) v kontekste dukhovnykh i esteticheskikh iskanii russkikh simvolistov [Review by D. V. Filosofov on the Moscow Art Theater production of “Uncle Vanya” by A. P. Chekhov (1901) in the context of the spiritual and aesthetic quests of Russian symbolists]. Bulletin of Kostroma State University, 2017, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 79–83. (in Russ.)

Lekmanov O. A. “Na beregakh Nevy” Iriny Odoevtsevoy: shest' kommentariev k kommentariyu [“On the Banks of the Neva” by Irina Odoevtseva: six comments on the commentary]. Literaturnyi fakt [Literary fact], 2020, no. 4, pp. 408–413. (in Russ.)

Markaryan O. E. Tragicheskie motivy Dostoevskogo v chekhovskom teatre: spektakl' Nemirovicha-Danchenko “Brat'ya Karamazovy” (1910) [Dostoevsky’s tragic motifs in Chekhov’s theater: Nemirovich-Danchenko’s play “The Brothers Karamazov” (1910)]. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Art Criticism, 2018, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 399–410. (in Russ.)

Moretti F. Distant Reading. Moscow, Gaidar Institute Publ., 2016, 352 p. (in Russ.)

Odoevtseva I. V. Zerkalo. Izbrannaya proza [Mirror. Selected Prose]. Ed. by M. Rubins. Moscow, Russkii Put’ Publ., 2011, 656 p. (in Russ.)

Polulyakh K. V. “O lyubvi”: chekhovskie traditsii v rasskaze I. V. Odoevtsevoy “U morya” [“About Love”: Chekhovian Traditions in I. V. Odoevtseva’s Story “By the Sea”]. In: Slavyanskii mir: dukhovnye traditsii i slovesnost' [Slavic World: Spiritual Traditions and Literature]. Collection of Materials of the International Scientific Conference, dedicated to the 300th Anniversary of A. P. Sumarokov, the 200th Anniversary of A. K. Tolstoy (Tambov, May 23–25, 2017). Tambov, Print-Service, 2017, iss. 8, pp. 226–230. (in Russ.)

Rubins M. Parizhskaya proza Iriny Odoevtsevoy [The Parisian prose by Irina Odoevtseva]. In: Odoevtseva I. V. Zerkalo. Izbrannaya proza [Mirror. Selected Prose]. Ed. by M. Rubins. Moscow, Russkii Put’ Publ., 2011, pp. 5–26. (in Russ.)

Serdechnaya V. V. Literaturnyi romantizm kak teoreticheskaya problema [Literary Romanticism as a Theoretical Problem]. Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series: Literary Criticism. Linguistics. Cultural Studies, 2020, no. 9, pp. 19–27. (in Russ.)

Shtayn O. A. Zhenshchiny-filosofy. Myslitel'nitsy, izmenivshie mir [Women Philosophers. Thinkers Who Changed the World]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2024, 256 p. (in Russ.)

Schtein S. Yu. Teoreticheskaya model' ontologii kino kak znanievaya matritsa tselostnoi kinoteorii [Theoretical Model of Cinema Ontology as a Knowledge Matrix of a Holistic Film Theory]. Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series: Philosophy. Sociology. Art Criticism, 2014, no. 14 (136), pp. 214–225. (in Russ.)

Tolstoy L. N. Collected works. In 22 vols. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1980, vol. 5, 429 p.; 1981, vol. 8, 495 p. (in Russ.)

Zhulkova K. A. Spetsifika funktsionirovaniya khudozhestvennoi detali v memuarakh Iriny Odoevtsevoy “Na beregakh Nevy” [Specifics of the functioning of the artistic detail in the memoirs of Irina Odoevtseva “On the banks of the Neva”]. Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Seriya 7: Literaturovedenie [Social and humanitarian sciences. Russian and foreign literature. Series 7: Literary criticism], 2022, no. 1, pp. 49–61. (in Russ.)

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology