|
|||||||||||||
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences |
|
||||||||||||
|
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737 Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 | |
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics) | |
|
ArticleName: Functioning of Evaluative Substantive Metaphors and Similes in Modern Russian Prose Authors: Natalia A. Nikolina, Zoya Yu. Petrova, Natalya A. Fateeva Moscow State Pedagogical University, Moscow, Russian Federation,V. V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract: The article discusses functioning of evaluative comparative tropes in the texts of modern Russian prose. The works of Yu. Buyda, E. Vodolazkin, A. Ivanov, A. Ilichevsky, A. Matveeva, D. Rubina, O. Slavnikova, E. Chizhova, G. Yakhina and other writers are analyzed. Contexts extracted from the Russian National Corpus are also involved. It is shown that modern Russian prose is characterized by the active use of evaluative metaphors and similes. The research confirms the conclusion about the dominance of negative evaluation in modern literature. The article highlights the most productive semantic classes of images of comparison that express evaluation: zoonyms and names of artifacts, food products. The evolution of the composition of evaluative images of comparison in the language of Russian literature is noted. It is shown that in the texts of modern Russian prose various types of specific evaluation are used, which interact with each other in the context. It is concluded that the formation and strengthening of evaluativeness is largely facilitated by the context, the units of which extend the axiological potential to the components of the tropes. It is noted that in modern Russian prose there are both commonly used evaluative metaphors and similes, as well as individual author’s comparative tropes, which, like the author's choice of certain semantic groups of evaluative images of comparison, participate in the formation of the author’s world image. The role of comparative constructions in the structure of the narrative is considered. It is shown that in modern prose texts, evaluative tropes regularly reflect the point of view of the characters, while interference of various subjective speech plans is observed. There is a tendency to use stylistically low comparison images in modern prose. Keywords: metaphor, simile, modern Russian prose, general evaluation, specific evaluation, narrative structure Bibliography: Aksenova N. V. Otsenochnye smysly v metafore (na materiale angloyazych-noy literatury XX veka) [Evaluative meanings in metaphor (based on the material of the 20th century English literature)]. Abstract of the Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. St. Petersburg, 2007, 19 p. (in Russ.) Arutyunova N. D. Tipy yazykovykh znacheniy: otsenka, sobytie, fakt [Types of linguistic meanings: evaluation, event, fact]. Moscow, Nauka, 1988, 338 p. (in Russ.) Balashova L. V. Russkaya metafora: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee [Russian metaphor: past, present, future]. Moscow, Yazyki Slavyanskoy Kul’tury Publ., 2014, 496 p. (in Russ.) Grigorieva T. V. Otsenochno-simvolicheskaya nasyshchennost’ oppozitsii ‘goryachiy-kholodnyy’ [Evaluative-symbolic saturation of the opposition ‘hot-cold’]. Vestnik Kostromskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta im. N. A. Nekrasova, 2014, no. 5, pp. 160–163. (in Russ.) Grigorieva T. V. Semanticheskaya interpretatsiya kontseptov “Svet” i “T'ma” v russkom yazyke. Avtoreferat dis. ... kand. filol. nauk [Semantic interpretation of the concepts “Light” and “Darkness” in Russian]. Abstract of the Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Ufa, 2004, 24 p. Lakoff J., Johnson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem [Metaphors we live by]. Transl. from English, ed. by A. N. Baranov. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2004, 256 p. (in Russ.) Sherina E. A. Natsional’no-kul’turnaya spetsifika obraznoy leksiki russkogo yazyka (na materiale sobstvenno obraznykh slov, kharakterizuyushchikh cheloveka) [National-cultural specificity of the figurative vocabulary of the Russian language (based on the material of figurative words characterizing a person)]. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Tomsk, 2010, 367 p. (in Russ.) Teliya V. N. Metafora kak model’ smysloproizvodstva i ee ekspressivno-otsenochnaya funktsiya [Metaphor as a model of meaning production and its expressive and evaluative function]. In: Metafora v yazyke i tekste [Metaphor in language and text]. Moscow, Nauka, 1988, pp. 26–52. (in Russ.) Vertinskaya O. M. Emotsional’no-otsenochnaya leksika polozhitel’noy napravlennosti v proze V. Nabokova [Emotional and evaluative vocabulary of a positive orientation in V. Nabokov’s prose]. Abstract of the Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Kaliningrad, 2004, 26 p. (in Russ.) Volf E. M. Metafora i otsenka [Metaphor and evaluation]. In: Metafora v yazyke i tekste [Metaphor in language and text]. Moscow, Nauka, 1988, pp. 52–65. (in Russ.) Yurina E. A. Kulinarnye obrazy kak sredstvo vyrazheniya otsenki v russkoy idiomatike i metaforike [Culinary images as a means of expressing evaluation in Russian idiomatics and metaphors]. In: Slovo. Text. Czas XI. Frazeologia slowianska w aspekcie onomazjologicznym, lingwokulturologicznym i frazeograficznym. Szczecin. Greifswald, Wydawnictwo “Zapol”, 2012, pp. 222–228. (in Russ.) |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |