|
|||||||||||||
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences |
|
||||||||||||
|
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737 Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 | |
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics) | |
|
ArticleName: Cognitive Study of Path Metaphor and Military Metaphor in Political Discourse (Based on the Material of Tsai Ing-wen’s Address on the Occasion of Double Tenth Day in 2022 and Its Translation in Russian and English) Authors: Chang Jui-Cheng National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan
Abstract: Focusing on Tsai Ing-wen’s address on the occasion of “Double Tenth Day” on October 10, 2022, we analyze the cognitive and translation aspects of Tsai Ing-wen’s speech and its official translation in Russian and English. We study the role of path metaphor and war metaphor, which dominate in Tsai Ing-wen’s speech, in describing the development of the country and the fight against the coronavirus pandemic, as well as compare metaphorical contexts between the original address in Chinese and its official translation in Russian and English. In Summary, we highlight the significance of address on the occasion of “Double Tenth Day” in the discursive practice of Taiwanese politicians, the role of path metaphor and war metaphor in Tsai Ing-wen’s speech, as well as the features of translation of political metaphors. Keywords: political discourse, path metaphor, military metaphor, metaphorical model, translation, COVID-19 Bibliography: Balashova L. V. Militarnaya metafora kak sposob formirovaniya kontsepta KOVID-19 v rechi V. V. Putina. Kommunikativnye issledovaniya, 2020, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 777–800. (in Russ.) Balashova L. V. Russkaya metafora: proshloe, nastoyashhee, budushchee. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2014, 496 p. (in Russ.) Baranov A. N., Karaulov Yu. N. Slovar' russkikh politicheskikh metafor. Moscow, Pomovsky i partnery, 1994, 351 p. (in Russ.) Belov E. A. Uchanskoe vosstanie v Kitae. Moscow, Nauka, 1971, 249 p. (in Russ.) Budaev E. V. Militarnye metafory kak sredstvo kontseptuplizatsii belorusskoi militsii v rossiiskikh SMI. Politicheskaya lingvistika, 2022, no. 4 (94), pp. 12–20. (in Russ.) Chang, Juj-Cheng. Metafora puti v inauguratsionnoi rechi (na materiale vtorogo obrashheniya Tsai Ing-wen i ego perevoda na russkii i anglijskii yazyki). Voprosy izucheniya russkogo yazyka, istorii i kul'tury Rossii, 2021, no. 31, pp. 41–68. (in Russ.) Chang, Juj-Cheng. Metaforicheskaya model' “RAZVITIE STRANY – eto PUTEShESTVIE” v inauguratsionnoi rechi (na materiale pervogo obrashcheniya Tsai Ing-wen i ego ofitsial'nogo perevoda na angliiskii yazyk). Politicheskaya lingvistika, 2022, no. 6 (96), pp. 200–210. (in Russ.) Charykova O. N., Fedotova N. V. Koronavirusnyi diskurs kak istochnik aktivizatsii voennoi metafory. Russkaya rech', 2022, no. 1, pp. 50–60. (in Russ.) Chudinov A. P. Metaforicheskaya mozaika v sovremennoi politicheskoi kommunikatsii. Ekaterinburg, Ural State Pedagogical Uni. Press, 2003, 248 p. (in Russ.) Chudinov A. P. Rossiya v metaforicheskom zerkale: Kognitivnoe issledovanie politicheskoi metafory (1991–2000). Ekaterinburg, Ural State Pedagogical Uni. Press, 2001, 238 p. (in Russ.) Demiankov V. Z. Politicheskii diskurs kak predmet politicheskoi filologii. Politicheskaya nauka. Politicheskii diskurs: Istoriya i sovremennye issledovaniya, 2002, no. 3, pp. 32–43. (in Russ.) Dijk T. A. van. What is Political Discourse Analysis? In: Political Linguistics. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 1998, pp. 11–52. Evgeneva A. P. (ed.). Slovar' russkogo yazyka. In 4 vols. 3rd ed. Moscow, Russkii yazyk, 1988, vol. 4, 800 p. (in Russ.) Gavrilova M. V. Kognitivnye i ritoricheskie osnovy prezidentskoi rechi (na materiale vystuplenii V. V. Putina i B. N. Eltsina). St. Petersburg, SPbSU Press, 2004, 296 p. (in Russ.) Gavrilova M. V. Kognitivnye issledovaniya politicheskogo diskursa. Diskurs-Pi, 2013, iss. 3 (13), pp. 116–117. (in Russ.) Gavrilova M. V. Poslanie Federal'nomu Sobraniyu. Diskurs-Pi, 2013, iss. 3 (13), pp. 111. (in Russ.) Lakoff G., Johnsen M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem. Trans. from Eng. Ed. by A. N. Baranov. Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2004, 256 p. (in Russ.) Lju Lifjen, Huan Chzhunljan. Analiz kontseptualnoi metafory “voiny” v politicheskom diskurse (na primere “Poslanija Prezidenta RF Federalnomu sobraniyu” 2021 g.). Politicheskaya lingvistika, 2022, no. 1 (91), pp. 126–134. (in Russ.) Popova Z. D., Sternin I. A. Kognitivnaya lingvistika. Moscow, AST: Vostok-Zapad, 2010, 314 p. (in Russ.) Se Mjen-chzhje. Ritoricheskie figury v rechakh prezidentov po sluchayu Dnya dvukh desyatok (na materiale obrashchenii Ma In-czju i Chjen Shuj-bjanja). Magister Diss. Taipei, 2014. (in Russ.) Sheigal E. I. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa. Dr. Philol. Sci. Diss. Volgograd, 2000, 431 p. (in Russ.) Shveitser A. D. Teoriya perevoda: Status, problemy, aspekty. 3rd ed. Moscow, Librokom, 2012, 216 p. (in Russ.) Toporov V. N. Put'. In: Mifologiya: Stat'i dlya mifologicheskikh entsiklopedii. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2014, vol. 2, pp. 186–200. (in Russ.) |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |