|
|||||||||||||
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences |
|
||||||||||||
|
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737 Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 | |
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics) | |
|
ArticleName: On the Issue of Performativity of Hymns Authors: A. V. Proskurina Novosibirsk State Technical University, Russian Federation
Abstract: The article indicates that the study of the semantic-communicative component of hymns makes it possible to identify performative frameworks – “pillows”, on which the foundation of speech activity rests. Thus, the obligatory semantic-communicative component of the hymns is informing the deity about his/her qualities, in other words, it is praising. The article reviewed three hymns written in Old English (“The Kentish Hymn”, “Cædmon’s Hymn”) and Early Middle English (“Godric’s Hymn”). The author focuses on paganism in Old English hymns. Thus, the work emphasizes that at the dawn of Christianity, for a smooth transition from paganism to Christianity, the image of Jesus Christ was presented as the image of a leader (Cyning – Leader), while believers were represented as His warriors. The cross as the main Christian symbol often appears made of wood and is identified with the cosmic world tree growing right into heaven. Most liturgical texts compare a cross to a pillar, mountain, or ladder. Thus, the center of the world is a part of the Christian picture of the world. Consequently, considering the semiotic aspect of communication, it can be assumed that the communicative task proceeded from the fact that the new information was understood through its transmission within the framework of the old image already known to native speakers. Communication was based on a sociocultural basis due to interindividual psychology. Thus, the replacement of the central cosmic symbol of a world tree with a cross that retains the features of a pagan symbol is an example of accessible communication. The task of transmitting information in time is to transmit information about an important Christian element of culture – the cross as a symbol of Christianity. The pagan image of the world tree is completely unimportant from the point of view of the semiotic aspect of information transfer, but it is important from the point of view of communication in the generation of the Germans who have just adopted Christianity. Keywords: performativity, “The Kentish Hymn”, “Cædmon’s Hymn”, “Godric’s Hymn” Bibliography: Austin J. L. Performativnye vyskazyvaniya. In: Tri sposoba prolit' chernila [Three Ways of Spilling Ink]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya, St. Petersburg State Uni. Press, 2006, p. 262–281. (in Russ.) Austin J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford at the Clarendon Press, 1962, 174 p. Bēda Venerābilis. Tserkovnaya istoriya naroda anglov [Historia ecclesiastica gentis Anglorum]. Transl. from Latin by V. V. Erlikhman. St. Petersburg, 2001, 363 p. (in Russ.) Benveniste E. Obshchaya lingvistika [General Linguistics]. Transl. from Fr. by Yu. S. Stepanov. Moscow, Progress, 1974, 448 p. (in Russ.) Benveniste E. Slovar' indoevropeyskikh sotsial'nykh terminov [Le Vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes]. Moscow, Progress-Univers, 1995, 452 p. (in Russ.) Fedorov Yu. A. Obraz Kresta. Istoriya i simvolika pravoslavnykh nagrudnykh krestov [The image of Cross. History and symbolism of Orthodox cross orders]. St. Petersburg, 2000, 109 p. (in Russ.) Lotman M. Impossible Communication: The Logical-Semantical Structure and Communicative Perspective of Hymn. In: II Senso delle soggettività: Recerche semiotiche – Atti congress AISS, 2013, p. 72–80. Old English shorter poems. Ed. and transl. by Christopher A. Jones. Harvard University Press, 2012, 456 p. Proskurin S. G. Setevye struktury v yazyke i kul'ture [Network structures in language and culture] In: Romm M. V., Valdman I. A. (ed.). Obshchestvo setevykh struktur [Social network structures]. Monograph. Novosibirsk, NSTU Press, 2011, p. 233–280. (in Russ.) Proskurin S. G. Kurs semiotiki. Yazyk, kul'tura, pravo [Course of semiotics. Language, culture, law]. Novosibirsk, NSU Press, 2013, 226 p. (in Russ.) Proskurin S. G., Tsentner A. S. K predystorii pis'mennoy kul'tury: arkhaicheskaya semiotika indoevropeytsev [To the prehistory of written culture. Archaic semiotics of Indo-Europeans]. Novosibirsk, NSU Press, 2009, 196 p. (in Russ.) Proskurin S. G., Feshchenko V. V. Voice and bodily deixis as manifestation of performativity in written texts. Semiotica, 2019, vol. 2019, iss. 227, p. 317– 334. DOI 10.1515/sem-2017-0133. Searle John R. Classification of illocutionary acts. In: Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike [New in foreign linguistics]. Moscow, 1986, iss. 17, p. 170–194. Stepanov Yu. S. Konstanty: Slovar‘ russkoi kultury [Dictionary of Russian culture]. 3rd ed. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt, 2004, 992 p. (in Russ.) Tylor Edward Burnet. Pervobytnaya kultura [Primitive Culture]. Transl. from Engl. by D. A. Koropchevsky. Moscow, Politizdat, 1989, 573 p. Williamson C. The Complete Old English Poems (The Middle Ages Series). University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017, 1248 p. |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |