Article

Name: Yu. N. Chumakov’s Verse Theory

Authors: E. I. Khudoshina

Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

Abstract: The article combines a biographical essay on Yu. N. Chumakov’s scholarly career and a commentary on his book “In the Direction of a Lyrical Plot”. The book was written late in the scholar’s life and was intended as a summing up and clarification of those intentions that implicitly underlay all of his literary studies as well as the particular way of thinking about lyrical poetry that Yuri Nikolayevich seemed to have “always” possessed, long before he started to write about and analyze poetry. Chumakov’s first serious involvement in literary studies came rather late in his life. At the outset, he followed the structuralist method and was greatly influenced by the publication of Yu. M. Lotman’s first book, “Lectures on Structural Poetics”. “At the time, structuralism provided me with a language”, he used to say. Indeed, for a decade or so Chumakov was perceived as, and in fact, was a structuralist. However, in his earlier years, during which he had to face and overcome a lot of challenges, Chumakov had become keenly interested in philosophy and hermeneutics which remained his utmost priority throughout his life. This interest did not get in conflict with his passionate love of poetry – on the contrary, poetry became one of the ways in which he was able to delve into the concepts of Being and Existence which had become and always remained so vital for him. It was in those early years that Chumakov had gained a firm idea of what it meant to understand poetry and what kind of conditions were necessary for poetry to be understood. One of such conditions was the existence of a subjectsubject relationship with the text – something that was incompatible with thinking in oppositions which, in turn, was indispensable for the structuralist approach. Both of these trends in Chumakov’s intellectual interests found a direct and theoretically grounded expression in his book. A key feature of this monograph is its contradictions which are due to the fact that Yuri Nikolayevich was not satisfied with analyzing a literary text by using just a single method – either a purely scholarly (and inevitably binary) approach or a purely intuitivist one. He wanted to combine an academic analysis of a poem which would allow one to demonstrate a multiplicity of meanings produced by the poetic structure with an understanding of its “beingness” which, according to Heidegger, would reveal its true meaning. And, in fact, Chumakov succeeded in achieving such synthesis in his book where the concept of a lyrical plot is discussed in two different “languages” and through the use of two different logics. By using the binary oppositions approach, the author proves both the existence of the lyrical plot as a conceptual category and its irrationality. By using a different logic, which may be characterized as a “symmetrical” one and which utilizes analogy and similarity, Chumakov further explores the meaning of this concept. In doing so, he likens lyrical poetry to a “point that extends infinitely” which has always been his way of thinking about it. The writing style of the book is very condensed. The author intended for the reader to “follow the references” and independently uncover some of the book’s theoretical and philosophical premises. As a result, the reader may encounter certain difficulties in understanding the book which is why the article includes commentary on some of its theoretical concepts.

Keywords: lyrical plot, lyrical poetry, poetry, structuralism, intuitivism, Yu. N. Chumakov, Yu. M. Lotman, G. A. Gukovsky

Bibliography:

Bocharov S. G. Mirovye ritmy i nashe pushkinovedenie. Po prochtenii dvuh knig Yu. N. Chumakova // Bocharov S. G. Filologicheskie sjuzhety. M.: Yazyki slavjanskih kul'tur, 2007. S. 506–517.

Chudakov A. P. Chumakov Ju. Stihotvornaja pojetika Pushkina. SPb., 1999. 431 s. // Izvestija AN SSSR. Serija literatury i jazyka, 2002, tom 61, s. 57–62.

Chumakov Yu. N. V storonu liricheskogo sjuzheta. M.: Yazyki slavjanskoj kul'tury, 2010. 88 s.

Culler J. Teorija literatury. Kratkoe vvedenie. M.: Astrel': AST, 2006. 158 s.

Dehing J. «O» – puteshestvie v Nevyrazimoe. 2009. URL: http://maap.ru/ library/book/216/

Dehing J. Indivisible Reality. An Excursion in the Realm of the Unspeakable. 2002. URL: http://www.dankalia.com/science/psc134.htm

Ginzburg K. Primety: ulikovaja paradigma i ee korni // Ginzburg K. Mify – jemblemy – primety. M., 2004. 348 s.

Gumbreht H. U. Proizvodstvo prisutstvija: chego ne mozhet peredat' znachenie. M., 2006. 184 s.

Harms D. Poln. sobr. soch. v 3 t. SPb: Akademicheskij proekt, 1997. T. 2. 504 s.

Lotman Yu. M. Lekcii po struktural'noj pojetike // Yu. M. Lotman i tartusko-moskovskaja semioticheskaja shkola. M., 1994. S. 10–263.

Svetlikova I. Yu. Istoki russkogo formalizma: Tradicija psihologizma i formal'naja shkola. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2005. 166 s.

Tynjanov Yu. N. Problema stihotvornogo jazyka. L. : Academia, 1924. 140 s.

Tynjanov Yu. N. Problema stihotvornogo jazyka. Stat'i. M.: Sovetskij pisatel', 1965. 304 s.