Article

Name: Counterfactual narratives and the problem of the receptive event in the short story “Ruchka, nozhka, ogurechik…” by Yu. Dombrovsky

Authors: Dina V. Shulyatyeva

HSE University, Moscow, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Abstract:

Narrative includes not only events that occur within a storyworld but also those that only could have occurred. These “possible” events are incorporated into the narrative progression and shape the reader’s experience. Such events, which are subsequently contradicted or conflict with the plot’s trajectory, are defined by researcher Hilary Dannenberg as counterfactual. This article examines counterfactual narratives through an analysis of Yuri Dombrovsky’s short story “Ruchka, nozhka, ogurechik…” (“Little arm, leg, cucumber…”; 1977). These narratives problematize the sphere of actual events by blurring the distinction between the historical and the potential. Consequently, the “possible” at the plot level is experienced by readers as “actually happened.” They invite the reader to complete a narrative that appears inherently incomplete. At the representational level, the effect of realism is enhanced by a metonymic writing style and an appeal to the reader’s sensory experience. In the story, the “possible” takes priority over “what actually happened,” preventing the reader from fully determining the protagonist’s fate. Simultaneously, this “potentiality” displaces actual events, illustrating a loss of control over one’s life, fears, and imagination. This effect is achieved through affective amplification created by expanding counterfactual lines. Paradoxically, these counterfactual events do not appear counterfactive to the reader. Instead, the narrative is recognized as prophetically foretelling the author’s actual death.

Keywords: сounterfactuality, virtual event, alternate possible worlds, virtual voice, reception event, Yuri Dombrovsky

Bibliography:

Barthes R. Bart R. Vvedenie v strukturnyy analiz povestvovatel’nykh tekstov [Introduction to the structural analysis of narrative texts]. G. K. Kosikov (Transl.). In Zarubezhnaya estetika i teoriya literatury 19–20 vv.: traktaty, stat’i, esse [Foreign aesthetics and literary theory of the 19th–20th centuries: treatises, articles, essays]. Moscow, MSU, 1987, pp. 387–422.

Bruner J. Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard Uni. Press, 1986, 222 p.

Chion M. The voice in cinema. New York, Columbia Uni. Press, 1999, 208 p.

Dannenberg H. Coincidence and counterfactuality: plotting time and space in narrative fiction. Lincoln, Uni. of Nebraska Press, 2008, 304 p.

Grishakova M. Interface Ontologies: On the possible, virtual, and hypothetical in fiction. In Possible worlds theory and contemporary narratology. Bell A., Ryan M.-L. (Eds). Lincoln, Uni. of Nebraska Press, 2019, pp. 88–110.

Hühn P. Functions and forms of eventfulness in narrative fiction. In Theorizing Narrativity. Pier J., Garcia Landa J. A. (Eds). Berlin, de Gruyter, 2008, pp. 141–163.

Milich S. Virtual’nyy narrativ kak povestvovatel’naya al’ternativa [Virtual narrative as a narrative alternative]. Narratorium, 2017, no. 1 (10). URL: https:// narratori-um.ru/2018/04/03/%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%B6%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0-%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%B2% D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87-%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0% B8%D1%87/ (accessed 15.05.2024).

Ryan M.-L. Possible worlds, artificial intelligence and narrative theory. Bloomington, Uni. of Indiana Press, 1991, 291 p.

Ryan M.-L. Virtuality. In Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory. Herman D.,

Jahn M., Ryan M.-L. (Eds). London, New York, Routledge, 2005, pp. 627–629.

Yakobson R. O. Dva aspekta yazyka i dva tipa afaticheskikh narusheniy [Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic violations]. In Teoriya metafory [Theory of metaphor]. Arutyunova N. D., Zhurinskaya M. A. (Eds.). Moscow, Progress, 1990, pp. 110–133.