![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences |
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Philology) | |
|
Article
Authors: Nikolai D. Golev, Victoria S. Melnikova, Galina V. Napreenko Kemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russian Federation In the section Linguistics
Abstract: This paper analyzes the features of Russian legal texts within the framework of “new variantology” through an examination of Articles 6.1 and 7 of the Kemerovo Region Law No. 119-OZ “On Interbudgetary Relations” (November 26, 2008). The analysis focuses on the important aspects of implementing new methodological approaches in legal text analysis, as well as on the characteristics of linguistic variation found in normative acts. This study breaks new ground by being the first to examine how different language versions appear and function in legal documents, specifically using regional laws. The findings demonstrate that the “new variantology” approach can facilitate the identification of patterns in using diverse linguistic tools for creating legal norms and elucidate the influence of local factors on regional legal discourse. Additionally, a reverse machine translation technique was used to analyze synchronous variability, thus positioning the investigation within the domain of translation variantology. According to a supplementary survey, legal texts present considerable comprehension challenges for students, whether they specialize in the subject or not. Ultimately, the practical significance of this work lies in its potential to contribute to scholarship on Russian legal texts, to aid in distinguishing between human- and AI-generated texts, and to identify components that affect text complexity. Keywords: reverse machine translation, text complexity, variability, text of the law, variantology, text comprehensibility Bibliography: Golev N. D., Kim L. G. Variativno-interpretatsionnoe funktsionirovanie teksta (k voprosu o rasshirenii granits lingvisticheskoy variantologii) [Variational-interpretative functioning of the text (on the issue of expanding the boundaries of linguistic variantology)]. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. 2009, no. 27, pp. 12–20. Golev N. D. Makromodelirovanie yazykovoy variativnosti: k rasshireniyu granits lingvisticheskoy variantologii (aspektualizirovannyy obzor rabot rossiyskikh lingvistov) [Macromodeling of linguistic variability: towards expanding the boundaries of linguistic variantology (an aspectualized review of the works of Russian linguists)]. Nauchnyi dialog (Scientific Dialogue). 2023, no. 12 (8), pp. 86–125. Golev N. D., Mel’nikova V. S. Obratnyy mashinnyy perevod na sluzhbe yuridicheskoy lingvistiki [Reverse machine translation in the service of legal linguistics]. In: Innovatsionnye, informatsionnye i kommunikatsionnye tekhnologii: Sb. tr. XVII Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Sochi, 01–10 oktyabrya 2020 g.) [Innovation, information, and communication technologies: Proceedings of the XVII International Scientific and Practical Conf. (Sochi, October 1–10, 2020)]. Moscow, 2020, pp. 8–11. Golev N. D., Napreenko G. V. Perevodimost’ i variativnost’ teksta v aspekte antinomii “tozhdestvo – razlichie” [Translatability and text variability in the aspect of the “identity–difference” antinomy]. Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal [Siberian Journal of Philology]. 2023, no. 4, pp. 299–311. DOI 10.17223/18137083/85/22 Golev N. D. Slozhnost’ vs dostupnost’ i ponyatnost’ yazyka zakona kak teoreticheskaya i ekspertnaya problema [Complexity vs. accessibility and comprehensibility of the language of law as a theoretical and expert problem]. In: Voprosy russkogo yazyka v yuridicheskikh delakh i protsedurakh: Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Sankt-Peterburg, 18 maya 2021 g.) [Issues of the Russian language in legal matters and proce-dures: International Scientific and Practical Conference (St. Petersburg, May 18, 2021)]. St. Petersburg, Pervyy klass, 2021, pp. 160–176. Gritsenko A. S., Antonov A. V. Prostoy yazyk prava. Postanovka problemy, obshchie podkhody i sovremennye tendentsii [The simple language of law. Statement of the problem, general approaches, and current trends]. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Law. 2022, no. 1, pp. 3–15. Irkova A. V. Tipologiya yuridicheskikh terminov v aspekte slozhnosti yazyka [Ty-pology of legal terms in terms of language complexity]. In: Voprosy russkogo yazyka v yuridicheskikh delakh i protsedurakh: Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Sankt-Peterburg, 18 maya 2021 g.) [Issues of the Russian language in legal matters and proce-dures: International Scientific and Practical Conference (St. Petersburg, May 18, 2021)]. St. Petersburg, Pervyy klass, 2021, pp. 187–200. Kim L. G. Ob”ektivnye i sub”ektivnye faktory variativnosti interpretatsiy teksta za-kona v spetsial’noy yuridicheskoy literature i v obydennom soznanii nositeley yazyka [Objective and subjective factors for variability in interpreting the law text in special-ized legal literature and in everyday consciousness of language speakers]. Sibirskii Fil-ologicheskii Zhurnal [Siberian Journal of Philology]. 2022, no. 2, pp. 298–311. Mel’nikova V. S. Izmerenie stepeni slozhnosti teksta zakona s pomoshch’yu komp’yuternykh programm: k postanovke problemy [Measuring the complexity of legal texts using computer programs: toward a problem statement]. In: Filologiya, inostrannye yazyki i mediakommunikatsii. Materialy simpoziuma v ramkakh XVI (XLVIII) Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii studentov, aspirantov i molodykh uchenykh. Tom Vypusk 22. Nauch. redaktor [Philology, foreign languages, and media communica-tions. Proceedings of the Symposium within the framework of the XVI (XLVIII) Inter-national scientific conference of students, postgraduates, and young scientists]. Yu. V. Podkovyrin (Ed.). Kemerovo, 2021, vol. 22, pp. 31–33. Mel’nik N. V. Derivatsionnoe funktsionirovanie teksta: lingvotsentricheskiy i personotsentricheskiy aspekty [Derivational functioning of the text: linguacentric and perso-nacentric aspects]. Kemerovo, 2010, 211 p. Popovskaya V. I. Interpretatsiya yuridicheskogo teksta: k postanovke problem [In-terpretation of a legal text: toward a problem statement]. In: Aktual’nye voprosy re-chevogo vzaimodeystviya: Materialy Vseros. nauch. konf., posvyashch. yubileyu pro-fessora L. A. Mesenyashinoy (Chelyabinsk, 24 oktyabrya 2019 g.) [Current issues of speech interaction: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific Conference dedicated to the anniversary of Professor L. A. Mesenyashina (Chelyabinsk, October 24, 2019)]. Chelyabinsk, Chelyabinsk State University, 2019, pp. 177–184. Rabenko T. G., Lebedeva N. B. Rechevoy zhanr v fokuse variantologicheskoy modeli yazyka (na materiale rechevogo zhanra “lichnaya zapiska”) [Speech Genre in the focus of the variantological model of language (based on the speech genre “personal note”)]. Culture and text. 2018, no. 1 (32), pp. 144–152. Rabenko T. G. Rechevoy zhanr s pozitsiy lingvisticheskoy variantologii (na materiale rechevogo zhanra “Lichnoe pis’mo”) [Speech genre from the standpoint of lin-guistic variantology (based on the speech genre “Personal letter”)]. Nauchnyi dialog (Scientific Dialogue). 2017, no. 12, pp. 189–199. |
![]() |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |