Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Philology)
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Semantics of verbs of object transfer in Khakass and Altai languages

Authors: Olga Yu. Shagdurova, Elena V. Tyuntesheva

Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 4, 2024Pages 201-214
UDK: 811-512+811.512.153:81’367.625DOI: 10.17223/18137083/89/15

Abstract:

The paper deals with the semantic features of verbs of object transfer in Khakass and Altaic languages. The use of lexemes describing the situation of physical transfer with subjects and objects of different types is analyzed. An attempt has been made to systematize verbs by components incorporated into semantics. All these verbs include obligatory signs characteristic of the situation of transfer (semantics of transfer, starting and ending points, object and subject of action). Besides, these tokens contain additional components incorporated into their semantics: “the path,” “route,” “manner of transfer transfer,” “means of transfer” (“transport” and “tool”), and “object.” According to the typological classification developed by L. Talmi, the Turkic languages belong to the verbal type, with their verb roots expressing an indication of the “the path.” The verbs with an incorporated “manner of transfer” component can have their “direction” parameter specified with satellites. The subject of the verbs under study can be a person, less often an animal, or a technical means. When secondary meanings of physical action are expressed, the subject can be expressed by natural phenomena and objects (wind, river, waves). The objects of physical movement are represented by various physical objects and living beings. The examined languages exhibit considerable resemblance in terms of the composition and semantic structures of the verbs associated with transfer. Each language has its own set of verbs used in everyday life and work activities of specific ethnic and linguistic groups.

Keywords: Siberian Turkic languages, Khakass language, Altai language, lexical-semantic group of verbs, verbs of object movement, lexical semantics, polysemantics

Bibliography:

Bulynina M. M. Glagol’naya kauzatsiya dinamiki sintaksicheskogo kontsepta (na materiale russkoy i angliyskoy leksiko-semanticheskikh grupp glagolov peremeshcheniya ob”ekta) [Verbal causation of syntactic concept dynamics (on the material of Russian and English lexical-semantic groups of verbs of object movement)]. Dr. philol. sci. diss. Voronezh, 2004, 40 p.

Butorin S. S. Direktivnye glagol’nye satellity v ketskom yazyke i tipologiya modeley leksikalizatsii L. Talmiv [Directive verbal satellites in the Ket language and typology of lexicalization models by L. Talmi]. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2012, iss. 1 (116), pp. 33–37.

Chugunekova A. N. Glagoly dvizheniya i formiruemye imi modeli prostogo predlozheniya (na materiale khakasskogo yazyka) [Verbs of motion and models of a simple sentence formed by them (a case study of the Khakass language)]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Novosibirsk, 1998, 19 p.

Chugunekova A. N. Glagoly so znacheniem kauzatsii peremeshcheniya, pomeshcheniya i lokalizatsii ob”ektov [Verbs with the meaning of causation of moving, placing and localization of objects]. The world of science, culture and education. 2011, iss. 2 (27), pp. 46–48.

Kolesnikova A. V. Affiksal’noe glagoloobrazovanie v altayskom yazyke (v sopostavlenii s drevnetyurkskim yazykom) [Affixal verb formation in the Altai language (in comparison with the ancient Turkic language)]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Novosibirsk, 2004, 28 p.

Koshkareva N. B. Propozitsiya i model’ (na primere predlozheniy peremeshcheniya v ural’skikh i tunguso-man’chzhurskikh yazykakh Sibiri) [Proposition and model (on the example of displacement sentences in Uralic and Tunguso-Manchurian languages of Siberia)]. Humanitarian sciences in Siberia. 2004, no. 4, pp. 70–80.

Magomedova P. A. Funktsional’no-semanticheskiy analiz glagolov peremeshcheniya v avarskom i russkom yazykakh [Functional-semantic analysis of verbs of movement in the Avar and Russian languages]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Makhachkala, 1993, 20 p.

Maisak T. A. Tipologiya grammatikalizatsii konstruktsiy s glagolami dvizheniya i glagolami pozitsii [Grammatikalization paths of motion and posture verbs: typology]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 2005, 480 p.

Nevskaya I. A. Prostranstvennye otnosheniya v tyurkskikh yazykakh Yuzhnoy Sibiri (na materiale shorskogo yazyka) [Spatial relations in the Turkic languages of Southern Siberia (a case study of the Shor language)]. Novosibirsk, 2005, 304 p.

Rassadin V. I. Problemy obshchnosti v tyurkskikh yazykakh sayano-altayskogo regiona [Issues of Universality in Sayan-Altai Turkic Languages]. In: Tyurkologicheskiy sbornik. 1977 [Turkological Anthology. 1977]. Moscow, 1977, pp. 219–231.

Rychkova N. G. Sintaksicheskie mekhanizmy formirovaniya ekspressivnosti (na primere predlozheniy s russkimi glagol’nymi frazeologizmami s prototipicheskoy strukturoy peremeshcheniya). [Syntactic mechanisms of expressiveness formation (a case study of sentences with Russian verbal phraseologisms with the prototypical structure of movement)]. Cand. philol. sci. diss. Krasnoyarsk, 2017, 413 p.

Shilova V. V. Prostranstvennye modeli elementarnykh prostykh predlozheniy v nenetskom yazyke: Ch. 1 [Spatial models of elementary simple sentences in the Nenets language: Part 1]. Novosibirsk, NSU, 2003, 106 p.

Shmeleva T. V. Modus i sredstva ego vyrazheniya v vyskazyvanii [Modus and its means of expression]. In: Ideograficheskie aspekty russkoy grammatiki [Ideographic aspects of Russian grammar]. Moscow, 1988, pp. 168–202.

Solovar V. N. Semantika glagolov peremeshcheniya i formiruemye imi elementarnye prostye predlozheniya v khantyyskom yazyke (na materiale kazymskogo dialekta) [Semantics of verbs of movement and elementary simple sentences formed by them in the Khanty language (a case study of the Kazym dialect)]. Herald of Vyatka State University. 2011, iss. 1–2, pp. 45–49.

Solovar V. N. Semanticheskaya klassifikatsiya glagolov po sposobu dvizheniya (na materiale kazymskogo dialekta khantyyskogo yazyka) [Semantic classification of verbs by the way of movement (a case study of Kazym dialect of the Khanty language)]. Bulletin of Ugric studies. 2016, iss. 4 (27), pp. 58–67.

Tverdokhleb O. G. Reprezentatsiya instrumenta (tekhnika) v sub”ektnykh pozitsiyakh v russkikh predlozheniyakh, obrazovannykh glagolami peremeshcheniya, orientirovannogo otnositel'no konechnogo punkta [Representation of a tool (technique) in subject positions in Russian sentences formed by verbs of movement, oriented relativeto the final point]. Vestnik Priamurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. Sholom-Aleykhema. 2017, no. 2 (27), pp. 90–99.

Talmy L. Towards a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2000, 565 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology