Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Philology)
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Adverbs denoting a lack of awareness and control (in the context of goal-setting)

Authors: Irina P. Matkhanova, Tatiana I. Steksova

Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 4, 2024Pages 186-200
UDK: 81'367.624DOI: 10.17223/18137083/89/14

Abstract:

The paper analyzes the adverbs beskontrol’no (uncontrollably), mashinal’no (automatically), neosoznanno (unconsciously), bestsel’no (purposelessly), and others as a remarkable phenomenon that occupies a unique space between adverbs of manner and adverbs of purpose, encompassing attributes from both groups. Some common characteristics have been identified for the adverbs concerned. All are formed from adjectives, can be combined with intensifiers, focus on the subject of action, perform the duplex function, and may combine with verbs denoting the action under control. However, certain semantic differences and functioning peculiarities allowed distinguishing four subgroups. The adverb beskontrol’no can characterize both the internal subject of control, coinciding with the agent, and the external one. The adverbs of machinality, due to the special state and professionalism of the subject of action, express the absence of constant control over the action. The adverbs denoting the lack of consciousness in the performance of an action demonstrate a shift towards qualitativeness. While retaining the focus on the subject, they identify the lack of a rational way of achieving a result. The adverb bestsel’no mostly implements the semantics of lack of goal attainment, depending on the semantics of a particular verb. Some other specific features of each subgroup have been identified. For example, they can be enlarged by other adverbs (such as reflektorno, bessoznatel’no, instinktivno, and others that are synonymous to those under analysis), with all groups retaining the common considered in this study.

Keywords: Russian language, adverbs, semantics, controllability/uncontrollability, purpose-setting

Bibliography:

Admoni V. G. Grammaticheskiy stroy kak sistema postroeniya i obshchaya teoriya grammatiki [Grammar as a construction system and general theory of grammar]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1988, pp. 76–84.

Apresyan Yu. D. Interpretatsionnye glagoly: semanticheskaya struktura i svoystva [Interpretive verbs: semantic structure and properties]. Russian Language and Linguistic Theory. 2004, no. 1, pp. 5–22.

Arutyunova N. D. Yazyk tseli [Language of purpose]. In: Logicheskii analiz yazyka. Modeli deistviya [Logical analysis of language. models of action]. Moscow, Indrik, 1992, pp. 14–23.

Bitekhtina G. A. Semantiko-sintaksicheskie razryady opredelitel’nykh narechii v sovremennom russkom yazyke i usloviya ikh funktsionirovaniya [Semantic-syntactic categories of attributive adverbs in the modern Russian language and the conditions for their functioning]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Moscow, 1979, 16 p.

Buslaev F. I. Istoricheskaya grammatika russkogo yazyka [Historical grammar of the Russian language]. Moscow, Uchpedgiz, 1959, 623 p.

Degal’tseva A. V. Narechiya obraza deistviya v raznykh sferakh sovremennogo russkogo obshcheniya: strukturno-semanticheskaya tipologiya i rol’ v organizatsii smysla predlozheniya [Adverbs of the manner in different spheres of modern Russian communication: structural-semantic typology and role in creating the meaning of a sentence]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Saratov, 2021, 51 p.

Domashenkina G. P. Sintagmaticheskie svoistva kachestvennykh narechii na -O, -E, -I v sopostavlenii so svoistvami prilagatel’nykh [Syntagmatic properties of qualitative adverbs in -O, -E, -I in comparison with the adjective properties]. In: Voprosy teorii russkogo yazyka i govorov Dal’nego Vostoka [Questions of the theory of the russian Language and dialects of the Far East]. Khabarovsk, Khabarovskiy gos. ped. institut, 1973, pp. 50–60.

Khoruk K. M. Rol’ obstoyatel’stva obraza deistviya v organizatsii semanticheskoi struktury russkikh prostykh predlozhenii [The role of the adverbial modifiers of manner in establishing the semantic structure of Russian simple sentences]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Novosibirsk, 2010, 16 p.

Levontina I. B. Ponyatie tseli i semantika tselevykh slov russkogo yazyka [The concept of purpose and semantics of purpose expressing words in the Russian language]. In: Yazykovaya kartina mira i sistemnaya leksikografiya [Language picture of the world and systemic lexicography]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 2006, pp. 163–240.

Rudnitskaya E. L. Nekotorye klassy sententsial’nykh narechii v russkom yazyke. Semantika. Sintaksis. Leksikografiya [Some classes of sentential adverbs in the Russian language. Semantics. Syntax. Lexicography]. Voprosy Yazykoznaniya [Topics in the study of language]. 1994, no. 1, pp. 114–125.

Russkaya grammatika: V 2 t. [Russian grammar: In 2 vols.]. Moscow, Nauka, 1982, vol. 1, 783 p.

Steksova T. I. Semantika nevol’nosti v russkom yazyke: znachenie, vyrazhenie, funktsii [Semantics of involuntariness in the Russian language: meaning, expression, functions]. Novosibirsk, 2002, 200 p.

Vinogradov V. V. Russkii yazyk (grammaticheskoe uchenie o slove) [Russian language (grammatical doctrine of the word)]. Moscow, Vyssh. shk., 1972, 614 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology