Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Philology)
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: A dash in a binominative sentence: cases of a comparative conjunction and negation before the predicate

Authors: Mikhail Ya. Dymarsky

Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; Institute for Linguistic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 3, 2023Pages 312-324
UDK: 811.161.1'367DOI: 10.17223/18137083/84/22

Abstract:

This work discusses the principles of studying the punctuation practices. Particular attention is paid to the selection of material depending on the study objectives. It is shown that developing a codifier does not require studying the practices of incompetent native speakers. It is argued that formulating the punctuation rules should be algorithmizable due to the multifactorial nature of most punctuation rules. When dealing with multiple factors at once, the user is inevitably faced with the question of the order in which to perform the relevant operations. Therefore, capturing the conflicting trends of punctuation practice, the registering approach should be excluded from the rulebook, as it would not allow for the algorithmization of rule application. The fixation of opposite tendencies in some rules of the current code does result in the inapplicability of the rule and its ignorance in punctuation practice. This fact is illustrated by two notes to the rule on a dash in a binominative sentence: when a comparative conjunction or a negation is present. Analyzing the data from the National Corpus of the Russian Language has revealed that the actual norm ignores these notes and relies on the intonational characteristic of the binominative sentence. This study demonstrates that taking into account the intonation principle of punctuation contributes to identifying the actual norm of dash placement in a binominative sentence and allows it to be fixed in a new compact formulation of the rule.

Keywords: Russian language, punctuation, intonation principle, norm, codification, binominative sen-tence, dash

Bibliography:

Akhapkina Ya. E. Ierarkhiya punktuatsionnykh pravil: predely usvoeniya [Hierarchy of punctuation rules: limits of assimilation]. Proceedings of the V. V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute. 2021, no. 3, pp. 215–226.

Biyanova M. V. Punktuatsionnye sistemy: sinkhronnyy i diakhronnyy aspekty [Punctuation systems: synchronic and diachronic aspects]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Izhevsk, 2010, 24 p.

Bylinskiy K. I., Rozental’ D. E. Trudnye sluchai punktuatsii [Difficult cases of punctuation]. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 1961, 232 p.

Valgina N. S. Trudnye voprosy punktuatsii: Posobie dlya uchitelya [Difficult punctuation issues: A teacher’s guide]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie, 1983, 176 p.

Valgina N. S. Aktual’nye problemy sovremennoy russkoy punktuatsii [Actual problems of modern Russian punctuation]. Moscow, Vyssh. shk., 2004, 259 p.

Dymarskiy M. Ya. Intonatsionnyy printsip russkoy punktuatsii i ego primenenie v formulirovkakh pravil [The intonation principle of Russian punctuation and its application in the wording of the rules]. In: Yazyk i metod. Russkiy yazyk v lingvisticheskikh issledovaniyakh 21 veka. VII. Russkaya punktuatsiya v kommunikativnom aspekte [Language and method. Russian language in linguistic studies of the 21st century. VII. Russian punctuation in the communicative aspect]. D. Shumska, K. Ozga (Eds.). Krakow, Jagiellonian Univ. Press, 2021a, pp. 23–33.

Dymarskiy M. Ya. Eshche raz o sistemnosti punktuatsii [Once again on the systemic character of punctuation]. Proceedings of the V. V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute. 2021b, no. 3, pp. 238–251.

Kim I. E. Punktuatsiya “govoryashchego” i punktuatsiya “slushayushchego”: onomasiologicheskiy i semasiologicheskiy podkhod v punktuatsii [Punctuation of the “speaker” and punctuation of the “listener”: onomasiological and semasiological approaches in punctuation]. Proceedings of the V. V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute. 2021, no. 3, pp. 252–259.

Pravila russkoy orfografii i punktuatsii: Polnyy akademicheskiy spravochnik [Rules of Russian orthography and punctuation: A complete academic reference book]. Lopatin V. V. (Ed.). Moscow, 2009, 432 p. URL: http://orthographia.ru (accessed 24.12.2022).

Rozental’ D. E. Spravochnik po pravopisaniyu i stilistike [Reference book on spelling and stylistics]. Moscow, IK “Komplekt”, 1997. URL: http://rosental-book.ru (accessed 24.12.2022).

Russkaya grammatika [Russian grammar]. Shvedova N. Yu. (Ed.). Moscow, 1980, vol. 1, 784 p.

Shvartskopf B. S. Sovremennaya russkaya punktuatsiya: sistema i ee funktsionirovanie [The contemporary Russian punctuation: the system and its functioning]. Moscow, Nauka, 1988, 191 p.

Shmelev A. D. Voprosy punktuatsii v rabote Orfograficheskoy komissii Rossiyskoy akademii nauk: lingvisticheskie osnovy kodifikatsii [Issues of punctuation in the work of the Spelling Committee of Russian Academy of sciences: the linguistic basics of codification]. In: Yazyk i metod. Russkiy yazyk v lingvisticheskikh issledovaniyakh 21 veka. VII. Russkaya punktuatsiya v kommunikativnom aspekte [Language and method. Russian language in linguistic studies of the 21st century. VII. Russian punctuation in the communicative aspect]. D. Shumska, K. Ozga (Eds.). Krakow, Jagiellonian Univ. Press, 2021, pp. 15–21.

Shubina N. L. Punktuatsiya v kommunikativno-pragmaticheskom aspekte i ee mesto v semioticheskoy sisteme russkogo teksta: Monografiya [Punctuation in the communicative-pragmatic aspect and its place in the semiotic system of the Russian text: Monograph]. St. Petersburg, 1999, 297 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology