 |
|
||||||||||||
|
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences |
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
 | |
| Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Philology) | |
| |
|
Article
Authors: Valentina E. Golovchiner, Natalia A. Babenko Tomsk State Pedagogical University, Tomsk, Russian Federation In the section Study of literature
Abstract: The creative path of Nikolai Erdman commenced with poetry and extended to encompass works for the stage, reviews, scripts for the cinema, and plays for the drama theater recognized by the most talented directors of his time. Not a single Russian play had such success as “Mandat” (“The Mandate”), staged by V. Meyerhold in 1925. His play “Samoubiytsa” (“The Suicide”) (1929) was banned in 1932, along with everything he had written before. Erdman’s plays were translated and staged in different languages during the 1970s, but unfortunately, he did not live long enough to see his works achieve global recognition. The comprehension of Erdman’s plays started with a discussion of the subject of satire. It proceeded in terms of the trends established in the literature on other material, the farcical paradigm of the Russian theater of the early twentieth century, carnivalization, and artistic axiology. For the first time, this paper aims to reveal the unique nature of the organization of the central part of the play under study. For this purpose, the content of the word obozrenie (review) is clarified, and its correlation with the phenomenon and the term kumulyatsiya (cumulation) is identified. The organizing principles revealed in the central part of the play, developed by the most ancient cumulative fairy tale, allow showing the danger of the actions of a prosperous multitude in achieving their selfish goals, the threat to the life of an individual and humanity on the eve of the European cataclysms of the 1930s. Keywords: N. Erdman, V. Ya. Propp, “The Suicide,” review, drama, action, cumulation, fairy tale Bibliography: Bakhtin M. M. Otvet na vopros redaktsii “Novogo mira” [Answer to the question of the editors of “Novyi Mir”]. In: Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 1979, pp. 328–325. Erdman N. Samoubiytsa [The suicide]. In: N. Erdman. P’yesy. Intermedii. Pis’ma. Dokumenty. Vospominaniya sovremennikov [Plays. Interludes. Letters. Documents. Memories of contemporaries]. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 1990, pp. 81–164. Eyzenshteyn S. Montazh attraktsionov [Installation of Attractions]. Eisenstein S. Izbrannye proizvedeniya: V 6 t (T. 2) [Selected works: in 6 vols.]. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 1964, vol. 2, pp. 269–273. Freydenberg O. M. Mif i literatura drevnosti [Myth and Literature of Antiquity]. 2nd ed., rev. and exp. Moscow, Vost. lit., 1998, 800 p. Golovchiner V. E. Epicheskaya drama v russkoy literature 20 veka [Epic drama in Russian literature of the 20th century]. Tomsk, TSPU, 2007, 320 p. Golovchiner V. E. K istorii pervoy literaturovedcheskoy stat’i o p’ese N. Erdmana “Samoubiytsa” [To the history of the first literary article on N. Erdman’s play “The Suicide”]. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2019, no. 6 (203), pp. 118–121. DOI 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-6-119-121 Golovchiner V. E. “Yubileynoe” i “Vo ves’ golos” v logike odnogo liricheskogo syuzheta V. Mayakovskogo 1920-kh godov [“The anniversary” and “At top of my voice” in the logic of one lyrical plot of V. Mayakovsky in the 1920s]. In: Vladimir Mayakovskiy v mirovom kul'turnom prostranstve. K 125-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya [Vladimir Mayakovsky in the world cultural space. To the 125th anniversary of his birth]. Moscow, IMLI RAN, 2018, pp. 31–40. Guthertz A., Fridman D. Osnovnyye daty zhizni i tvorchestva Nikolaya Erdmana [The main dates of life and art of Nikolai Erdman]. In: N. Erdman. P’esy. Intermedii. Pis’ma. Dokumenty. Vospominaniya sovremennikov [Interludes. Letters. Documents. Memories of contemporaries]. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 1990, pp. 513–523. Kiselev N. N. Komediya N. Erdmana “Samoubiytsa” [N. Erdman’s comedy “The suicide”]. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2019, no. 6 (203), pp.105–118. Republished by V. E. Golovchiner, O. N. Rusanova. DOI 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-6-105-117 Kofman A. F. Primitivistskaya sostavlyayushchaya avangardizma. [Primitivist Component of Avant-gardism]. In: Avangard v kul’ture 20 veka (1900–1930 gg.). Teoriya. Istoriya. Poetika: V 2 kn. [Avant-garde in the culture of the twentieth century (1900–1930). Theory. History. Poetics: In 2 books]. Moscow, IMLI RAN, 2010, pp. 157–228. Lotman M. Yu. Blok i narodnaya kul’tura goroda [Blok and the folk culture of the city]. In: Lotman Yu. M. Izbrannye stat’i: V 3 t. [Selected articles: in 3 vols.]. Tallinn, Alexandra, 1992, vol. 3, pp. 185–200. Meyerkhol’d V. E. Iz otveta na anketu gazety “Vechernyaya Moskva” [From the answer to the questionnaire of the newspaper “Evening Moscow”]. In: Meyerkhol’d V. E. Stat’i. Pis’ma. Rechi. Besedy. [Articles. Letters. Speeches. Conversations]. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 1968, pt. 2: 1917–1936, p. 95. Propp V. Ya. Kumulyativnaya skazka [Cumulative fairy tale]. In: Propp V. Ya. Poetika fol’klora. Chast’ vtoraya [Poetics of folklore. Part Two]. Moscow, Labyrint, 1998, pp. 251–269. Rudnitskiy K. Rezhisser Meyerkhol’d [The stage director Meyerhold]. Moscow, Nauka, 1969, 525 p. Tamarchenko N. D. Metodologicheskie problemy teorii roda i zhanra v poetike 20 veka [Methodological issues of type and genre theory in poetics of the 20th century]. In: Teoriya literatury [Literary Theory]. Moscow, IMLI RAN, 2003, vol. 3: Rody i zhanry [Genera and genres], pp. 81–98. Trotskiy L. D. Literatura i revolyutsiya [Literature and revolution]. Moscow, Politizdat, 1991, 400 p. Shtraukh M. Dva Sergeya Mikhaylovicha [Two of Sergeys Mikhailovich]. In: Tret’yakov S. “Slyshish’, Moskva?!” [“Hear, Moscow?!”]. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 1966, pp.174–186. Uvarova E. D. Ot sostavitelya [From the compiler] Moskva s tochki zreniya: Estradnaya dramaturgiya 20–60-kh godov. [Moscow from a point of view: Variety drama of the 20–60s]. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 1991, pp. 5–25. Velekhov L. Samyy ostroumnyy [The most witty]. Teatr. 1990, no. 3, pp. 90–96. |
 |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |