Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Philology)
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: “The Brothers Karamazov” by F. M. Dostoevsky: two addendums to one episode commentary (Khokhlakova and Dmitry Karamazov)

Authors: Tatyana I. Pecherskaya

Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Issue 2, 2023Pages 73-84
UDK: 821.161.1 + 070DOI: 10.17223/18137083/83/6

Abstract:

This paper analyzes in detail the episode in the chapter “Gold Minesˮ of “The Brothers Karamazovˮ by F. M. Dostoevsky. The focus is on the markers of the polemically addressing the episode to Saltykov-Shchedrin and the specifics of his narrative technique. Firstly, the methods of researchers to the background of the polemic originating in the 1860s are reviewed, the necessity of expanding the context of the episode is motivated, and new extra narrative information is introduced completing the picture and deepening the episode's interpretation. Parody has been found to be the leading mode of polemic, with Mrs. Khokhlakova as its “agent,” the absurdity of her statements providing a channel for the transmission of the polemical reference “over and above” the text. A similar function is given to Turgenev, who is semantically close to Saltykov in his parody function in context of the heroine’s reasoning. Secondly, the narrative technique of the episode is analyzed within the framework of a micro-fragment in which Khokhlakova “blessesˮ Dmitry Karamazov for his trip to Siberia. The details are explicated, allowing the allusions to the novel “Crime and Punishment” to be seen, suggesting other pairs of characters: Raskolnikov and the money-lender, Raskolnikov and Sonya. The technique of combining and “splitting” the plot situations in multidirectional projections is considered (comic and dramatic), which implicitly introduces a multidimensional plot of the crime, universal in the work of the writer. The plot auto-parody is considered as a technique triggering the plot-doubling mechanism.

Keywords: “The Brothers Karamazovˮ, Dostoevsky, Saltykov-Shchedrin, commentary, plot auto-parody

Bibliography:

Belova A. V. Saltykov-Shchedrin i zhenskiy vopros v Rossii 19 veka [Saltykov-Shchedrin and the women’s question in Russia of the 19th century]. In: Shchedrinskiy sbornik: sbornik statey. [Shchedrin collection: collection of articles]. Moscow, Izd. Mosk. gos. univ. dizayna i tekhnologii,, 2016, iss. 5, pp. 211–220.

Borshchevskiy S. S. Shchedrin i Dostoevskiy: Istoriya ikh ideynoy bor’by [Shchedrin and Dostoevsky: the history of their ideological struggle]. Moscow, Goslitizdat, 1956, 392 p.

Dolinin A. S. Turgenev v “Besakhˮ [Turgenev in “The Devilsˮ]. In: Dolinin A. S. Dostoevskiy i drugie: stat’i i issledovaniya o russkoy klassicheskoy literature [Dostoevsky and others: articles and research on Russian classical literature]. Leningrad, Khudozh. lit., 1989, pp. 163–187.

Kiyko E. I. Kommentariy [Commentary]. In: Dostoevskiy F. M. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 30 t. [The complete works: in 30 vols.], Leningrad, Nauka, 1976, vol. 15, pp. 487–513.

Nikol’skiy Yu. N. Turgenev i Dostoevskiy: (istoriya odnoy vrazhdy) [Turgenev and Dostoevsky: (the story of one animosity)]. Sofiya, Ros.-bolg. Knigoizd, 1921, 108 p.

Pecherskaya T. I. Zaklad Dostoevskogo: tri tysyachi v romane “Prestuplenie i nakazanieˮ [Dostoyevsky’s pawn: three thousand at the novel “Crime and Punishmentˮ]. Critique and Semiotics. 2017, no. 2, pp. 97–108.

Rak V. D. Dostoevskiy i Saltykov-Shchedrin v 1876 godu [Dostoevsky and Saltykov-Shchedrin in 1876]. In: Dostoevskiy. Materialy i Issledovaniya [Dostoevsky. Materials and Research]. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 2007, vol. 18, pp. 102–114.

Reyfman P. S., Klimova D. M. Kommentariy [Commentary]. In: Saltykov-Shchedrin M. E. Sobranie sochineniy: v 20 t. [Collected works: in 20 vols.]. Moscow, Khudozh. lit., 1972, vol. 13, pp. 774–776.

Stroganova E. N. Roman M. E. Saltykova-Shchedrina “Sovremennaya idilliyaˮ. Dialog s sovremennikami i predshestvennikami [The novel by M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin “Modern idyllˮ. Dialogue with contemporaries and predecessors]. Moscow, Nauka, 2017, 200 p.

Tunimanov V. A. Dostoevskiy i Saltykov-Shchedrin (1856–1863) [Dostoevsky and Saltykov-Shchedrin (1856–1863)]. Tunimanov V. A. Labirint stsepleniy: izbrannye stat’i [Labyrinth of clutches: selected essays]. V. A. Tumanov, S. N. Gus’kov (Eds.), N. L. Sukhachev (Comp.), N. L. Sukhacheva, M. V. Otradina (Introd. art). St. Petersburg, Pushkinskiy dom, 2013, pp. 92–113.

Vetlovskaya V. E. Kommentariy [Commentary]. In: Dostoevskiy F. M. Poln. sobr. soch.: V 30 t. [Complete works: In 30 vols.]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1976, vol. 15, pp. 393–619.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology