Article

Name: Gender-specific vocabulary: lexicographic tradition and dynamic processes in modern Russian language

Authors: Bulygina E. Yu., Tripolskaya T. A.

Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Abstract:

The paper is devoted to the semantic-pragmatic study of gender-marked vocabulary, in particular, emotional and evaluative nouns of common gender usually considered in grammatical and semantic-stylistic aspects. There is a large group of words in the dictionaries belonging as they do to the common gender. However, numerous cases are not so obvious (dushechka (darling), p’yanitsa (drunkard), glupyshka (silly), skvalyga (rogue), etc.). The meaning of such characteristics of a person is heterogeneous: it includes denotative and connotative (pragmatic) macro-components. Of interest is the correlation between gender and emotional-evaluative meanings. Active processes occur in this emotional and evaluative vocabulary category, resulting in lexemes losing their ability to designate males and females and becoming gender-specific characteristics. Lexicographic, psycholinguistic, and contextual analysis of emotional and evaluative nouns of common gender was conducted. We compared the data of three explanatory dictionaries and identified a lot of lexemes requiring special corpus and/or psycholinguistic research to establish their gender correlation. The results show that the nouns attributed by most respondents (90 % or more) to a particular gender tend to lose their common gender. However, several words causing the biggest difficulties for the respondents made the survey results not unambiguous. We conducted a corpus study to verify the experimental data, with the results confirming our hypothesis. Among the nouns describing both males and females (the core of this grammatical category), some lexemes that tend to become gender specific and, therefore, to shift to the category of masculine or feminine nouns.

Keywords: lexicography, words of common gender, dynamic processes in vocabulary, gender component, database of Russian pragmatically marked vocabulary

Bibliography:

Bulygina E. Yu., Tripolskaya T. A. Slovar’ emotivno-otsenochnoy leksiki v paradigme aktivnoy leksikografii [Dictionary of emotional-evaluative words in paradigm of active lexicography]. Vestnik NSU. Series History and Philology, 2017a, vol. 16, no. 9: Philology, pp. 11–21. DOI 10.25205/1818-7919-2017-16-9-11-21

Bulygina E. Yu., Tripolskaya T. A. Gendernyy komponent v semantike slova i sposoby yego leksikografirovaniya v slovaryakh aktivnogo tipa [The Gender Component in the Semantics of an Emotive-Evaluative Words and Ways of Presenting it in the Active Type Dictionary]. In: Sovremennye problemy slavyanskoy filologii: transformatsiya tsennostey v slavyanskikh yazykakh i kul’turakh [Modern problems of Slavic philology: transformation of values in Slavic languages and cultures]. Taipei, 2017b, pp. 50–62.

Fadeeva L. V. Emotsional’no-otsenochnaya leksika kak element sub”ektivnoy informatsii (na materiale nemetskogo yazyka) [Emotional evaluative vocabulary as an element of subjective information (based on the German language)]. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. 2017, no. 7 (73), pt. 2, pp. 178–185.

Golev N. D. Morfologicheskaya sushchnost sushchestvitel'nykh tak nazyvayemogo obshchego roda [Morphological essence of nouns of the so-called common gender]. In: Vinogradovskiye chteniya: materialy mezhvuz. nauch. konf. [Vinogradov reading materials of the interuniversity scientific conference]. E. N. Yermakova (Ed.). Tobolsk, 2001, pp. 107‒108.

Golev N. D. “Obshchiy rod” i gendernaya semantika russkikh imen sushchestvitelnykh: bigendernost ili agendernost? [Common gender and gender semantics of Russian nouns: bigender or agender?] Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2013, no. 6 (26), pp. 14‒28.

Kirilina A. V. O primenenii ponyatiya gender v russkoyazychnom lingvisticheskom opisanii [On the application of the concept of gender in the Russian-language linguistic description]. Philological Sciences. 2000, no. 3, pp. 18‒27.

Krongauz M. A. Sexus, ili problema pola v russkom yazyke [Sexus, or the problem of sex in Russian]. In: Rusistika. Slavistika. Indoyevropeistika [Russian studies. Slavic studies. Indo-European studies]. T. M. Nikolayeva (Ed.). Moscow, Indrik, 1996, pp. 510‒525.

Pavlova I. B. Otsenochnost’ sushchestvitel’nykh obshchego roda i sredstva ee vyrazheniya [Evaluation of common gender nouns and means of its expression]. Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Russian Philology. 2010, no. 5, pp. 52‒58.

Polyakova L. S. Ponyatiye “gender” v lingvisticheskom opisanii [The concept of “gender” in the linguistic description]. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2009, no. 11, pp. 44–49.

Russkaya grammatika: V 2 t. [Russian grammar: In 2 vols]. N. Yu. Shvedova et al. (Eds). Moscow, Nauka, 1980, vol. 1: Fonetika. Fonologiya. Udarenie. Intonatsiya. Slovoobrazovanie. Morfologiya [Phonetics. Phonology. Accent. Intonation. Word formation]. 710 p.

Tripol’skaya T. A. Gendernyy faktor v semantike emotivno-otsenochnogo slova [Gender factor in the semantics of the emotive-evaluative word]. In: Psikholingvisticheskie aspekty izucheniya rechevoy deyatel’nosti: Tr. Ural. psikholingv. ob-va [Psycholinguistic aspects of the study of speech activity. Proc. of the Ural Psycholinguistic Society]. Yekaterinburg, 2006, iss. 4, pp. 113–120.

Trofimova E. B. Sushchestvitel’nye obshchego roda kak problemnoe pole v lingvistike [Common gender nouns as a problem field in linguistics]. In: Aktual’nye problemy sovremennogo slovoobrazovaniya: Sb. nauch. st. [Actual problems of modern word formation: coll. of sci. art.]. L. A. Arayeva (Ed.). Kemerovo. 2011, iss 4, pp. 475–480.