Article

Name: Models of downward motion and their metaphorical potential (in Russian and Chinese)

Authors: Tao Tszin

Peoples Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Abstract: The paper analyses the hypothesis of a mental structure as movement models to categorize the changes by the example of variable representation of performance indicators of the downward direction in Chinese and Russian. The research materials are the lexical and semantic variants of indicators xia and c- 1 , including the dictionary definitions and semantic features described by Chinese and Russian scholars. By reconstructing the physical causation processes represented by two indicators, we found that in the Chinese language consciousness, a human body is a landmark for determining “the TOP”/“the BOTTOM.” In Russian, it is another object. The principal figure in the anthropic-oriented model is the subject of cognition, combining the role of a landmark for determining “the TOP”/“the BOTTOM.” During the metaphoric implementation, SOMETHING “placed” originally in the area of “anthropic-oriented TOP” appears in the area of “anthropic-oriented BOTTOM” as a result of the manipulation. Depending on the nature of SOMETHING, the correlations are formed: “the BOTTOM – the zone under control,” “the BOTTOM – the zone of certainty,” “the BOTTOM – the zone of embodiment,” “the BOTTOM – the zone of passivity.” Three variations of the object-oriented model implementation were revealed: changes destroying the current situation, changes towards “decreasing,” and repositioning of SOMETHING. In general, when implementing an object- oriented model, the correlation between the idea of “being on something” and understanding “being” prevails. Thus, the variability of metaphorization of changes is explained by different motion models being implemented and is due to spatial localization being a landmark-dependent operation and variability of a landmark choice.

Keywords: categorization of changes, direction, model of motion, variability, landmark

Bibliography:

Budaev E. V., Chudinov A. P. Sovremennaya teoriya kontseptual’noy metafory: amerikanskiy i evropeyskiy varianty [Contemporary theory of conceptual metaphor: American and European variants]. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and intercultural communication. 2007, no. 25, pp. 10–22.

Chudinov A. P. Kognitivno-diskursivnoe issledovanie politicheskoy metafory [Political metaphor: a discourse-cognition approach]. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics. 2004, no. 1, pp. 91–105.

Glebkin V. V. Teoriya kontseptual’noy integratsii Zh. Fokon’e i M. Ternera: opyt sistemnogo analiza [The theory of conceptual integration of G. Fauconnier and M. Turner: the experience of system analysis]. Voprosy filosofii. 2013, no. 9, pp. 161– 174.

Dobrushina E. R. Korpusnye issledovaniya po morfemnoy, grammaticheskoy, leksicheskoy semantike russkogo yazyka [Russian Corpus studies on morphemic, grammatical, lexical semantics]. Moscow, St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University Publ., 2014, 270 p.

Eloeva F. A., Perekhval’skaya E. V., Sausverde E. Metafora i evristicheskaya funktsiya yazyka (byvaet li yazyk bez metafor) [Metaphor and heuristic function of language (Is d language without metaphor possible?)]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija (Topics in the study of language). 2014, no. 1, pp. 78–99.

Kibrik A. E. Lingvisticheskaya rekonstruktsiya kognitivnoy struktury [Linguistic reconstruction of cognitive structure]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija (Topics in the study of language). 2008, no. 4, pp. 51–77.

Krongauz M. A. Pristavki i glagoly v russkom yazyke: semanticheskaya grammatika [Prefixes and verbs in Russian: semantic grammar]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 1998, 288 p.

Kustova G. I. Tipy proizvodnykh znacheniy i mekhanizmy yazykovogo rasshireniya [The types of derivative meanings and mechanisms of language extensions]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 2004, 472 p.

Lakoff D., Dzhonson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem: Per. s angl [Metaphors we live by: transl. from English]. A. N. Baranov (Ed., foreword). Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2004, 256 p.

Petrov V. V. Metafora: ot semanticheskikh predstavleniy k kognitivnomu analizu [Metaphor: from semantic representation to cognitive analysis]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija (Topics in the study of language). 1990, no. 3, pp. 135–146.

Rakhilina E. V., Reznikova T. I. Freymovyy podkhod k leksicheskoy tipologii [Frame-based approach to lexical typology]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija (Topics in the study of language). 2013, no. 2, pp. 3–31.

Tszin’ Tao Korrelyatsiya VVERKh-AKTIVIZATsIYa / VNIZ-DEAKTIVIZATsIYa i ee modifikatsiya v kitayskom, russkom i angliyskom yazykakh [Correlation UPACTIVATION / DOWN-DEACTIVATION and its modification in Chinese, Russian and English]. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics. 2019, no.1, pp. 30–40.

Tszin’ Tao Eksteriorizatsiya vospriyatiya vremeni po vertikali i gorizontali v kitayskom yazyke [Exteriorization of perception of time by vertically and horizontally in the Chinese language]. Journal of Psycholinguistics. 2016, no. 28, pp. 334–343.

Varfolomeeva I. V. O preimushchestve kompleksnogo podkhoda k izucheniyu metafory [About the advantage of a complex approach on the metaphor study]. Cognitive studies of language. 2016, no. 25, pp. 375–380.

Volokhina G. A., Popova Z. D. Russkie glagol’nye pristavki: semanticheskoe ustroystvo, sistemnye otnosheniya [Russian verb prefixes: semantic structure, system relations]. Voronezh, 1993, 196 p.