|
|||||||||||||
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences |
|
||||||||||||
|
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Philology) | |
|
ArticleName: Prejuridical and juridical meanings of a lexeme “grazhdanin” (a citizen) in social-political discourse Authors: A. V. Irkova Kemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russian Federation In the section Linguistics
Abstract: This paper discusses the process of juridization of the term “grazhdanin” (a citizen) in the social- political discourse. At present, the lexeme “grazhdanin” and many others containing the root -grazhd- have acquired juridical meanings and are used in legal texts. However, these lexemes were not considered as legal terms at first. The paper deals with the typology of the prejuridical content of the word “grazhdanin.” This typology is based on a varying degree of similarity of the public word semantics to the legal term status as a top point of the process of juridization. It is supposed to identify the pattern of pre-juridical use of the lexeme concerned and its synchronous results. The prejuridical status of a public word allows qualifying its meaning as semiterminological value. The variety of semantic registers of the public terms, fixed at this stage, does not disappear, leaving behind a trail of pre-juridic semantics and stylistic origin in the legal texts. “Spontaneous” units of natural language are revealed through a set of synonyms in socialpolitical discourse: “chelovek” (a human), a “grazhdanin” (a citizen), “lichnost’” (a personality), and “litso” (a person). The diachronic discourse-semantic analysis of the interaction between prejuridical and juridical meanings of the word “grazhdanin,” gradually incorporated into legal texts, allows revealing a discourse-semantic pattern of a public term being incorporated into legal communication. Keywords: legal linguistics, everyday language, juridization, terminologisation, law discourse, citizen Bibliography: Belousova K. A. “Dolzhnaya osmotritel’nost’ i ostorozhnost’” pri vybore kontragenta kak otsenochnoye ponyatiye, ne zakreplennoye normoy zakona [“Due diligence and care” at contractor selection as an evaluation notion not fixed by statutory provision]. Russian Judge. Publishing Group “Jurist”. 2017, no. 4, pp. 8–12. Brinev K. I. Metodologicheskiye problemy lingvisticheskoy ekspertizy: opredeleniye ponyatiya “sotsial’naya gruppa” [Methodological problems of linguistic expertise: defining the essence of extremism / defining the concept of “social group”]. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2012, no. 2 (15), pp. 117–123. Durinova G. V. Slovo i ponyatiye grazhdanin v russkom yazyke 18 v. (k voprosu o lingvisticheskoy osnove istorii ponyatiya) [The word and the notion citizen in the Russian language of the 18th century: The problem of the linguistic basis of the history of concepts]. St. Tikhon’s University Review. Series 3: Philology. 2015, iss. 1 (41), pp. 18–38. Fan I. B. Politicheskaya ontologiya rossiyskogo grazhdanina: soderzhaniye protiv formy [Political ontology of the Russian citizen: content versus form.]. Ekaterinburg, 2018, 332 p. Golev N. D., Vorob’yeva M. E. Interpretatsionnoye funktsionirovaniye yuridiche-skogo yazyka v obydennom soznanii: Monografiya [Functioning of juridical terms in ordinary consciousness of native speakers of Russian: Monograph]. Kemerovo. KSU Publ. 2017, 117 p. Golev N. D. Nauchnyye terminy kak edinitsy stikhiynogo funktsionirovaniya yazyka: polemicheskiye zametki [Scientific terms as manifestations of spontaneous functioning of language: polemic notes]. In: Metayazyk nauki: Materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. [Metalanguage of science: the proceedings of the International sci. conf.], Syktyvkar, 2012, pp. 5–1. Golev N. D., Lebedeva N. B. Sovremennyy slovar’ dialektnoy leksiki [The modern online dictionary of dialect vocabulary]. Siberian Journal of Philology. 2016, no. 2, pp. 125–133. Golev N. D., Irkova A. V. Stanovleniye yuridicheskogo termina kak protsess yuridizatsii obshchenarodnogo slova (diskursivno-semanticheskiy analiz leksem s kornyami chest- i dobr-) [The making of a legal term out of a general word: a discursive and semantic analysis of words with the roots chest- and dobr-]. Moscow State University Bulletin. 2018, no. 4, pp. 212–242. Golev N. D. Yuridizatsiya estestvennogo yazyka kak lingvisticheskaya problema [Problem of juridization of natural language in contemporary linguistics]. In: Yurislingvistika-2. Russkiy yazyk v ego estestvennom i yuridicheskom bytii [Legal linguistics-2. Russian language in its natural and legal existence]. Barnaul, 2000, pp. 8–40. Kandaurova T. N. O kharaktere oppozitsiy v parakh sootnosimykh mezhdu soboy nepolnoglasnykh i polnoglasnykh slov (na materiale drevnerusskogo pis’mennogo literaturnogo yazyka 11–14 vv.) [About the character of the opposition in pairs of related incomplete and full words (on the material of the Old Russian written literary language of the 11–14th centuries)]. In: Uchen. zap. Mosk. gos. ped. in-ta [Scientific works of Moscow State Pedagogical Institute]. Moscow, 1967, pp. 375–390. Kozlachkova E. A. Sootnosheniye ponyatiy “chelovek”, “lichnost’”, “fizicheskoye litso”, “grazhdanin” v rossiyskom prave [The correlation of definitions “human being”, “person”, “natural person”, “citizen” in Russian law]. Law and state: The theory and practice. 2014, no. 1, pp. 17–20. Kuznetsov A. M. Lingvisticheskiye tolkovaniya pravovogo smysla “prestupleniya” i “nakazaniya”: yuridicheskaya teoriya i bytovyye stereotipy [Linguistic interpretation of legal sense of terms “crime” and “punishment”: juridical theory and daily life stereotypes]. Moscow. INION RAN Publ., 2012, 75 p. Lukin P. V. Drevnerusskiye ponyatiya “gorozhanin”, “grazhanin”, “grazhdanin” [Ancient Russian notions “gorozhanin”, “grazhanin”, “grazhdanin”]. Rossiyskaya istoriya. 2014, no. 4, pp. 140–146. Marasinova E. N. Raby i grazhdane v Rossiyskoy imperii 18 v. [Slaves and citizens in the 18th century Russian Empire]. In: “Vvodya nravy i obychai Evropeyskiye v Evropeyskom narode”: k probleme adaptatsii zapadnykh idey i praktik v Rossiyskoy imperii [“Introducing European morality and customs into European society”: on the problem of adapting western ideas and practice in the Russian Empire]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2008, pp. 99–118. Mekhanoshina N. A., Filippova T. A. K voprosu ob opredelenii ponyatiya “pogloshcheniye” [To the definition of the concept “takeover”]. Legal linguistics. 2016, no. 5, pp. 27–118. Slovar’ russkogo yazyka 11–17 vv. [Dictionary of the Russian language of the 11–17th centuries]. S. G. Barxudarov (Ed.). Moscow, Nauka, 1977, iss. 4: G–D. Smirnov O. M. K voprosu ob ustanovlenii ugolovno-protsessual’nogo znacheniya ponyatiy “lichnost’”, “chelovek”, “grazhdanin”, “litso” i ikh sootnoshenii [To the question on the establishment of the criminal procedure meaning of the notions “personality”, “man”, “citizen”, “person” and their ratio]. Tomsk State University Journal. 2008, no. 307, pp. 98–99. Ulukhanov I. S. Istoricheskoye slovoobrazovaniye. Istoricheskaya leksikologiya [Historical derivation. Historical lexicology]. Moscow, OOO “LEKSRUS”, 2012, 368 p. Ulukhanov I. S. Motivatsiya i proizvodnost’ (o vozmozhnostyakh sinkhronno-diakhronicheskogo opisaniya yazyka) [Motivation and derivativeness (on the potential of synchronic- diachronic description of language)]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija (Topics in the study of language). 1992, no. 2, pp. 5–20. Vashchenko Yu. S. Inoyazychnaya yuridicheskaya leksika v zakonodatel’nykh tekstakh: istoriya poyavleniya, sovremennyye tendentsii i puti razvitiya [Foreign language law terms in legislative texts: genesis, recent trends and ways of developing]. State and Law. 2018, no. 1, pp. 53–64. Zhivov V. M. Razyskaniya v oblasti istorii i predystorii russkoy kul’tury [Researches on the history and prehistory of Russian culture]. Moscow. LRC Publishing House, 2002, 758 p. |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |