Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Philology)
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Aspects of the use of predicative morphemes with a dropping vowel in the Koryak and Alutor languages

Authors: A. A. Maltseva

Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 2, 2018Pages 227-243
UDK: 811.551+81’366DOI: 10.17223/18137083/63/20

Abstract: In the Koryak and Alutor languages, there are etymologically composite postfix predicative markers that contain a segment with a dropping vowel. According to the phonetic rules of the Chukchi-Koryak languages, this vowel must drop at the absolute end of the word and recover in the medial position. Consideration of five different predicatives (relational, possessive and qualitative adjectives, negative attributive and past participle) showed that the Koryak and Alutor languages are not equally strict in the application of this phonetic rule. In the Koryak language, the process of dropping and restoring of the vowel is sufficiently automatic. The marker with a final vowel cannot be used as an independent morpheme. Therefore, in the absolute end of the word, it necessarily drops. The vowel restoration is possible only in the medial position when it is followed by the affixes of dual and plural number, and for some predicatives, also by the case or personal markers. When the vowel is absent, the predicative affix expresses singular number, while a vowel is restored before obligatory numeral morphemes – non-singular. Before the case and personal markers, if a predicative allows their use, numeral oppositions are neutralized. Alutor language demonstrates much greater freedom in the use of numeral affixes after predicative morphemes. The spontaneity of the process of vowel dropping and restoring is lost, that is why the restoration of the vowel does not obligatory lead to the occurrence of a numeral postfix after it. The Alutor speakers have a choice in their use, so the numeral affixes became optional. Especially often the plural markers are dropped. The predicate morphemes, according to presence or absence of a final vowel, express the opposition of singular and non-singular numbers by themselves. In the two most frequent predicatives of Alutor (the qualitative adjective and the past participle), unique forms of the third person plural with short and extended allomorphs characteristic of folklore have appeared. One of the hypotheses of their origin is the early borrowing from the Koryak language of a morphemes complex from the frequent Presence form. In the speech of some native speakers of the Alutor language, engaged in reindeer herding and actively contacting with nomadic Koryaks, the third person plural forms of the past participle, borrowed from the modern Koryak language, are used sporadically. In one of the predicates, namely the negative attributive, both models of plurality expression are implemented – the additive model with the restoration of the vowel and the optional use of numeral morphemes and the substitutional model, when a morphemes complex of the negative attributive is partially dropped, and the unique plural Alutor marker is used, by analogy with the most frequent predicatives.

Keywords: Chukchi-Koryak languages, the Alutor language, the Koryak language, morphology, predicative, phonetic law, vowel dropping

Bibliography:

Fortescue M. Comparative Chukotko-Kamchatkan Dictionary. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 2005, 496 p.

Mel’chuk I. A. Model’ spryazheniya v alyutorskom yazyke [Model of conjugation in the Alutor language]. Institut russkogo yazyka AN SSSR. Problemnaya gruppa po eksperimental’noy i prikladnoy lingvistike. Iss. 45. Moscow, 1973a, pp. 1–71.

Mel’chuk I. A. Model’ spryazheniya v alyutorskom yazyke [Model of conjugation in the Alutor language]. Institut russkogo yazyka AN SSSR. Problemnaya gruppa po eksperimental’noy i prikladnoy lingvistike. Iss. 46. Moscow, 1973b, pp. 73–134.

Nagayama Yu. Ocherk grammatiki alyutorskogo yazyka [Sketch of the Alutor grammar]. Kioto, 2003, 314 p.

Stebnickiy S. N. Alyutorskiy dialekt nymylanskogo (koryakskogo) yazyka [Alutor dialect of the Koryak language]. Sovetskiy Sever. 1938, no. 1, pp. 65–102.

Volodin A. P. O “bluzhdayushchey morpheme” INE/ENA v chukotsko-koryakskikh yazykakh (opyt diakhronicheskoy interpretatsii) [On “a wandering morpheme” INE/ENA in the Chukchi-Koryak languages (attempt of the diachronic interpretation)]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija. 2000, no. 6, pp. 110–129.

Zhukova A. N. Alyutorskiy yazyk [Alutor language]. In: Yazyki narodov SSSR. T. 5: Mongol’skie, tunguso-man’chzhurskie i paleoaziatskie yazyki [Languages of the Peoples of the USSR. Vol. 5: Mongolic, Tungusic, and Paleosiberian languages]. Leningrad, 1968, pp. 294–309.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology