Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Philology)
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Idyllic image of Germany in Russian sentimentalism at the turn of the 19th century (based on N. M. Karamzin’s and F. P. Lubyanovskiy’s works)

Authors: S. S. Zhdanov

Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technologies, Novosibisrk, Russian Federation, Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Issue 2, 2018Pages 53-66
UDK: 821.161.1DOI: 10.17223/18137083/63/5

Abstract: The author of the article studies an idyllic image of Germany represented in two travelogues of the turn of the XIX century. These are N. M. Karamzin’s «Russian Traveller’s Letters» and F. P. Lubyanovsky’s «Journey to Saxony, Austria and Italy in 1800, 1801 and 1802». Both works were written within a framework of the sentimentalist discourse. Karamzin’s «Russian Traveller’s Letters» have been studied well enough in the Russian literary criticism. However, Lubyanovsky’s work has been researched to a much lesser degree. Thus, the contrastive-comparative analysis of these opuses seems to be interesting and meaningful, given a doubtless influence of the Karamzin’s «Letters…» upon a multitude of further Russian travelogues. This literature of journey was closely related to a significant transformation which touched the Russian culture in the 18-19th centuries in connection with expanding relations with the West. Travelogues devoted to European journeys were in this context a convenient space for communication between the Own and the Alien and made a substantial contribution to the national self-identification process of Russian writers and their audience. Describing their European tours, Karamzin and Lubyanovsky did not confine themselves to reporting the factual information and comparing Russians with other European nations. Both authors added actively mythopoetic aspects in their texts by using idyllic, Arcadian topoi which were contaminated with presenting the ‘real’ Germany. Furthermore, special characteristics of describing the German nature should be emphasized. The sentimentalist travelers deal here with a gentrified and ‘civilized’ landscape. In the descriptions of Germany, they give accent to the anthropic influence morphing and quieting the wild nature. This motive is mostly shown in the locus of the park and the garden. Parks and gardens are described not only within cities but also out of them. The idyllic image of the garden-country estate can extend and contaminate with anthropic-urbanistic spaces what gives rise to images of the garden-city and the park-principality. The locus of the garden also includes the meaning of the return to the lost and newly found paradise, to the golden age of humanity. At the same time, the space of the German idyll in the Russian travelogues is ambivalent. The authors not only create the image of the renewed Arcadia but deconstruct it, showing how a ‘real’ world differs from a literary ideal. The temperance and the patriarchy change to the philistine narrowmindedness and indifference. Thus, the idyll is destroyed by the author’s irony.

Keywords:

Bibliography:

Bakhtin M. M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki. Issledovaniya raznykh let [Questions of literature and aesthetics. Studies of different years]. Moscow, Khudozh. lit., 1975, 504 p.

Dmitrieva E. E., Kuptsova O. N. Zhizn’ usadebnogo mifa: utrachennyy i obretennyy ray [Life of the manor myth: lost and found paradise]. Moscow, OGI, 2008, 528 p.

Fonvizin D. I. Sobranie sochineniy: V 2 t. T. 2 [Collected works: in 2 vols. Vol. 2]. Moscow, Leningrad, Khudozh. lit., 1959, 742 p.

Gachev G. D. Natsional’nye obrazy mira. Ellada, Germaniya, Frantsiya: Opyt ekzistentsial’noy kul’turologii [National images of the world. Hellas, Germany, France: essay on the existential cultural studies]. Moscow, Logos, 2008, 424 p. Karamzin N. M. Pis’ma russkogo puteshestvennika [Letters of a Russian traveler]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1987, 716 p.

Konstantinova N. V. Russkiy travelog nachala XIX veka: Fenomen avtorskoy strategii (na materiale putevykh zapisok V. B. Bronevskogo) [The Russian travelogue of the beginning of the 19th century: the phenomenon of the author’s strategy (on the materials of V. B. Bronevskoy’s travel notes)]. Siberian philological journal. 2016, no. 3, pp. 79–88.

Likhachev D. S. Poeziya sadov. K semantike sadovo-parkovykh stiley. Sad kak tekst [Poetry of gardens. To the semantics of gardening styles. Garden as a text]. Moscow, Soglasie, Tip. “Novosti”, 1998, 356 p.

Lotman Yu. M. Izbrannye stat’i: V 3 t. T. 2: Stat’i po istorii russkoy literatury XVIII – pervoy poloviny XIX veka [Selected articles: in 3 vols. Vol. 2: Articles of the Russian literature history of the 18th – the first half of the 19th century]. Tallinn, Aleksandra, 1992, 480 p.

Lotman Yu. M., Uspenskiy B. A. “Pis’ma russkogo puteshestvennika” Karamzina i ikh mesto v razvitii russkoy kul’tury [“Letters of a Russian traveler” and their place in the evolution of the Russian culture]. In: Karamzin N. M. Pis’ma russkogo puteshestvennika [Letters of a Russian traveler]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1987, pp. 525–606.

Lubyanovskiy F. P. Puteshestvie po Saksonii, Avstrii i Italii v 1800, 1801 i 1802 godakh: V 3 ch. Ch. 1 [Journey through Saxony, Austria and Italy in 1800, 1801 and 1802: in 3 pts. Pt 1]. St. Petersburg, Meditsinskaya tip., 1805, 230 p.

Maroshi V. V. “Ideal’nyy peyzazh” v travelogakh russkikh puteshestvennikov o Tsentral’noy Azii [“Ideal landscape” in the travelogues of Russian travelers about Central Asia]. In: Pecherskaja T. I., Konstantinova N. V. (Eds). Russkiy travelog XVIII–XX vekov: marshruty, toposy, zhanry i narrativy: Kollektivnaya monogr. [Russian travelogue of the 18–20th centuries: routes, topoi, genres and narratives: collective monograph]. Novosibirsk, NSPU, 2016, pp. 37–68.

Schönle A. Podlinnost’ i vymysel v avtorskom samosoznanii russkoy literatury puteshestviy 1790–1840 [Authenticity and fiction in the Russian literary journey 1790–1840]. St. Petersburg, Akad. proekt, 2004, 272 p.

Sokolov M. N. Printsip raya. Glavy ob ikonologii sada, parka i prekrasnogo vida [The principle of the paradise. Chapters about the iconology of the garden, park and beautiful view]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya, 2011, 704 p.

Tirgen P. Obrazy Arkadii v russkoy literature XVIII–XIX vv. [Images of Arcadia in Russian literature of the 18–19th centuries]. Imagology and comparative studies. 2015, no. 2(4), pp. 69–110.

Toporov V. N. Vetkhiy dom i dikiy sad: obraz utrachennogo schast’ya [The decrepit house and the wild garden: the image of the lost happiness]. In: Oblik slova [Form of the word]. Moscow, Rus. slovari, 1997, pp. 290–318.

Tsiv’yan T. V. Verg. Georg. IV, 116–148: K mifologeme sada [Verg. Georg. IV, 116–148: to the mythologem of the garden]. In: Tekst: semantika i struktura [Text: semantics and structure]. Moscow, Nauka, 1983, pp. 140–152.

Zinov’ev V. N. Zhurnal puteshestviya po Germanii, Italii, Frantsii i Anglii (1784–1785) [Journal of a journey to Germany, Italy, France and England (1784–1785)]. In: Rossiya i Zapad: gorizonty vzaimopoznaniya. Vyp. 3: Literaturnye istochniki posledney treti XVIII veka [Russia and the West: perspectives of mutual understanding. Iss. 3: Literary sources of the final third of the 18th century]. Moscow, IMLI RAN, 2008, pp. 335–380.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology