|
|||||||||||||
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences |
|
||||||||||||
|
DOI: 10.25205/2410-7883 Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84792 | |
Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya | |
|
ArticleName: Pelevin’s Intertext in the Mirror of the Reader’s Reception Authors: Elena S. Tulusheva, Tatyana A. Semenova Moscow University named by A. S. Griboedov, Moscow, Russian Federation; National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russian Federation; Penza Agrarian University, Penza, Russian Federation In the section The Plot in Literature and Folklore
Abstract: The article presents a study of the readership ability to unravel the intertextual code of V. Pelevin’s late novel work. A sociological method was used – a questionnaire, which made it possible to determine the degree of recognition of reminiscences in the works of V. Pelevin. Intertextual and structural types of analysis are also used in order to identify traces of someone else’s word in a postmodern text and to indicate its connection with the plot, spatial and temporal organization of the text, composition or characterization of characters. The subject is the intertexteme in the novel work of V. Pelevin. It is revealed that the primary sources of Pelevin’s studies are recognizable, since the postmodernist refers to literary, cultural, musical cliches, archetypes and iconic quotations. Pelevin’s text is intertextually heterogeneous and has a wide network of borrowings, which indirectly indicates a focus on a wide range of readers: solving the intertexteme and discovering the original source directly depends on the cultural background of the recipient. The article proves that the presented text passages are precisely intertexts, that is, conscious authorial borrowings, and not random coincidences and intuitive embodiment of the national cultural code. Pelevin uses techniques of editing and syncretism, referring simultaneously to a variety of primary sources, combining high and low, thereby creating a polycythe. Intertext, performing a sense-forming function, not only allows you to give a concise characterization of a character, chronotope or situation, but also acts as a semantic duplicate of the plot and narrative vector. Numerous references determine the development of the author’s narrative, giving an additional clue about further events to the reader. The proposed design of the study and the application of the sociological method to the study of literary text has the potential to further expand and refine our conclusions. The presented results confirm the interest of the readership in the inclusive game, and not only in the Pelevin plot. The designation of the functional nature of Pelevin’s intertexts, including the definition of the intertext’s relationship with the plot, seems fresh and curious. Keywords: intertextuality, intertexteme, plot, postmodernism, V. Pelevin, reader’s reception Bibliography: Ayupov T. R. Spetsifika intertekstual’nykh svyazei v rannem tvorchestve V. O. Pelevina (na materiale romanov “Omon Ra” i “Chapaev i Pustota”) [The specifics of intertextual connections in V. O. Pelevin’s early work (based on the novels “Omon Ra” and “Chapaev and the Void”)]. Art Logos, 2021, no. 1 (14), pp. 63–72. (in Russ.) Bezrukov A. N. Poetika intertekstual’nosti [The poetics of intertextuality]. A text-book]. Birsk, BSSPA Press, 2005, 70 p. (in Russ.) Fateeva N. A. Intertekst v mire tekstov: kontrapunkt intertekstual’nosti [Intertext in the world of texts: the counterpoint of intertextuality]. Moscow, KomKniga Publ., 2007. 280 p. (in Russ.) Gereikhanova K. F., Sherchalova E. V. Mezhvremennoi dialog v tvorchestve V. Pelevina [Intertemporal dialogue in the works of V. Pelevin]. Bulletin of the Adygea State University. Series 2: Philology and Art History, 2022, no. 4 (307), pp. 45–51. (in Russ.) Golovanova E. I., Chasovsky N. V. Internet-mem kak element vizualizatsii v SMI [Internet meme as a visualization element in the media]. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University. Philology. Art history, 2015, iss. 94, no. 5 (360), pp. 136–138. (in Russ.) Gubaidulina V. R. Avtor i chitatel’ v khudozhestvennom tekste V. O. Pelevina [The author and the reader in the literary text of V. O. Pelevin]. Scientific Leader, 2021, no. 24, pp. 61–63. (in Russ.) Kikhnei L. G. K mekhanizmu obrazovaniya intertekstual’nykh motivov: motivnyi kompleks “volch’ei travli” v russkoi poezii XX veka [On the mechanism of intertextual motifs formation: the motif complex of “wolf baiting” in Russian poetry of the 20th century]. Bulletin of Tver State University. Philology Series, 2013. no. 1, pp. 46–58. (in Russ.) Kikhnei L. G., Temirshina O. R. “Kamennaya” paradigma “Grifel’noi ody” O. Mandelshtama: k mekhanizmam smyslovoi derivatsii [The “stone” paradigm of O. Mandelstam’s “Slate Ode”: on the mechanisms of semantic derivation]. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philology, 2020. no. 64, pp. 167–195. (in Russ.) Maryushkina A. P. “Pushkinskii kod” v romannoi proze V. Pelevina [“Pushkin’s Code” in V. Pelevin’s novelistic prose]. In: Maltseva T. V. (ed.). Pushkinskie chteniya – 2023. Khudozhestvennye strategii klassicheskoi i novoi slovesnosti: zhanr, avtor, tekst [Pushkin readings – 2023. Artistic strategies of classical and new literature: genre, author, text]. Materials of the XXVIII International Scientific Conference. St. Petersburg, A. S. Pushkin LSU Press, 2023, pp. 67–72. (in Russ.) Melnikova A. Yu. Virtual’noe prostranstvo i vremya v postmodernistskom tekste (V. Pelevin “Svyashchennaya kniga oborotnya”) [Virtual space and time in a post-modern text (V. Pelevin “The Sacred Book of the Werewolf”)]. Bulletin of N. A. Nekrasov KSU, 2009, no. 3, pp. 123–125. (in Russ.) Pelevin V. O. Nepobedimoe solntse [Invincible sun]. Moscow, Eksmo, 2020, 704 p. (in Russ.) Pelevin V. O. Puteshestvie v Elevsin [Journey to Eleusis]. Moscow, Eksmo, 2023, 480 p. (in Russ.) Pelevin V. O. Tainye vidy na goru Fudzi [Secret views of Mount Fuji]. Moscow, Eksmo, 2020, 416 p. (in Russ.) Pelevin V. O. Svyashchennaya kniga oborotnya [The Sacred Book of the Werewolf]. Moscow, Eksmo-Press, 2011, 384 p. (in Russ.) Pelevin V. O. Empire V. St. Petersburg, Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus, 2021, 416 p. (in Russ.) Pelevin V. O. iPhuck 10. Moscow, Eksmo, 2019, 480 p. (in Russ.) Sidorenko K. P. Intertekstovye svyazi Pushkinskogo slova [Intertextual connections of the Pushkin word]. St. Petersburg, A. I. Herzen RGSPU Press, 1999. 253 p. (in Russ.) Smirnov A. С. “Pushkinskii (“Tat’yanin”) tekst” v romane V. O. Pelevina “Chisla” [“Pushkin’s (“Tatiana’s”) text” in V. O. Pelevin’s novel “Numbers”]. In: Norm and deviation in literature, language and culture: A collective monograph. Grodno, YurSa-Print, 2021, pp. 284–294. (in Russ.) Tyupa V. I. Palimpsestnoe syuzhetoslozhenie i lirika [Palimpsest plot structure and lyrics]. Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya [Plot Description and Analysis], 2024. no. 2, pp. 5–10. (in Russ.) |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |