Article

Name: Hagiographicals Plots and Motives on the Modern Period: On Issue of Research and Classification

Authors: N. A. Nepomnyashchikh

Institute of Philology of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Plot and Motive: Theory, Typology, Systematization

Abstract:

Studying the hagiographic traditions in the literature the modern period, one faces several issues. Firstly, it is assumed that a scholar who compares the hagiographic motifs and plots to the motifs and plots of the modern period, deals with the a hypothetical complex of the already identified and described the hagiographic motifs and plots and all he has to do is to compare them to the motifs and plots of the literature works written in the later times. However, there is no yet such a thing as a complete research on all hagiographic motifs and plots. There are studies of the certain hagiographic texts and the certain types of hagiographic texts, but there is no comprehensive list or index of the hagiographic motifs and plots. Secondly, there is no uniformly accepted scholarly terminology defining what a hagiographic motif is. Can any element of a hagiographic text be considered as such? Should the motif be defined as a unit of a theme or of a plot depending on the theory a scholar chooses to base on: Veselovsky’s vs Tomashevsky’s? How is the term “topos”, which becomes more and more popular among the researchers of the hagiography, related to the hagiographic motifs and plots? Thirdly, the number of the hagiographic and literary texts as well as researches and studies on the subject is so huge that it is only possible to specify some trends of development of the hagiographic elements and traditions in the succeeding literature. The article summarizes and analyzes the existing scientific approaches to the issues of analysis, classification, typology of the hagiographic plots and some hagiographic motifs in the Russian literature of the modern period.

The conclusion of the survey is that the modern literature does not need the hagiography as a sapless model; such components of the hagiographic framework as its structure, plot, character, details are transformed from typical, similar to each other, copying the model ones to the unique ones interpreted in new original ways. Usage of the hagiographic sources can not be associated with a certain single genre; the hagiographic elements can be assimilated in any narrative or even in poetry. The literature of the modern period borrows plots, motifs and other elements of the hagiography but it lacks the utilitarian role that the hagiographic texts used to play as calendar reading. Names and dates become just literary symbols, references to some significant analogues but they do not demand to treat a literary character as a hagiographic character.

The main purpose of this work is to actualize the discussion on how an index of the hagiographic plots and motifs should be compiled, what a hagiographic motif and plot are, what should be considered hagiographic plots and motifs in later narratives, taking into account that not all the topoi and elements as well as rhetoric and periods, which are recognizable as the indicators of the “hagiographic tradition” in the narrative, can be defined as the motifs in the strict sense of the term.

Keywords: plot, motif, hagiography, Russian literature

Bibliography:

Bychkov D. M. Agiograficheskiy diskurs v sovremennoy russkoy proze [Hagiographcal discourse in modern Russian prose]. Astrakhan, 2015, 250 p. (in Russ.)

Davydova T. T. Antizhanry v tvorchestve E. Zamyatina. In: Novoe o Zamyatine [New about Zamyatin]. Moscow, 1997, p. 20–35. (in Russ.)

Klimova M. N. Ot protopopa Avvakuma do Fedora Abramova: zhitiya greshnykh svyatykh v russkoy literature [From Avvakum to Fyodor Abramov: the lives of the sinner saints in Russian literature]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2010, 134 p. (in Russ.)

Kovtun N. V. “Slepyashchee solntse” i “zloveshchaya t’ma” V. Rasputina: sfera vizual’nogo (na materiale prozy 1970-kh godov) In: Russkiy traditsionalizm: istoriya, ideologiya, poetika, literaturnaya refleksiya [Russian traditionalism: history, ideology, poetics, literary reflection]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka, 2016, 456 p. (Series “Universals of culture”, Iss. VII) (in Russ.)

Kovtun N. V. Yurodskoe stranstvie v poetike F. Abramova. Siberian Journal of Philology, 2010, no. 3, p. 93–102. (in Russ.)

Kovtun N. V. Russkaya traditsionalistskaya proza XX–XXI vekov: genezis, mifopoetika, konteksty [Traditionalist Russian prose of the 20th – 21st centuries: Genesis, poetics, contexts]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka, 2017, 600 p. (in Russ.)

Krasnova N. A., Krasnov A. G. Motivy zhitiya i agiologicheskikh zhanrovykh variantov [Hagiographcal motives as the main component of hagiography as a genre and this genre subdivisions]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo centra Rossijskoj akademii nauk [Izvestiya of the Samara Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2012, vol. 14, no. 2 (3), p. 740–746. (in Russ.)

Krasnova N. A. Zhitiynye motivy v romane Nikolaya Ostrovskogo “Kak zakalyalas’ stal’” [Hagiographcal motives of roman “How the Steel Was Tempered” (N. Ostrovskiy)]: Abstract of Philol. Cand. Diss. Samara, 2010. (in Russ.)

Lukiyanchikova N. V. Transformatsiya agiograficheskoy traditsii v proizvedeniyakh N. S. Leskova o “pravednikakh” [Transformation of hagiographic tradition in N. S. Leskov’s works about “the righteous”]. Abstract of Philol. Cand. Diss. Yaroslavl, 2004. (in Russ.)

Mayorova O. E. Literaturnaya traditsiya v tvorchestve pisatelya (na materiale proizvedeniy N. S. Leskova) [Literary tradition in the works of the writer (based on the works of N. S. Leskov]. Philol. Cand. Diss. Moscow, 1985. (in Russ.)

Mineeva I. N. Staropechatnyy Prolog XVII veka v tvorchestve N. S. Leskova: k rekonstruktsii odnogo literaturnogo kazusa. Istoricheskaya poetika [Historical Poetics], 2014, no. 12, p. 315– 327. (in Russ.)

Nepomnyashchikh N. A. “Deyaniya Azlazivona” L. M. Leonova: agiograficheskiy syuzhet i zhanr v avtorskoy interpretatsii. Siberian Journal of Philology, 2014, no. 1, p. 110–116. (in Russ.)

Nepomnyashchikh N. A. Semiotika chisel v rasskaze L. M. Leonova “Deyaniya Azlazivona”: istochniki i semantika. Syuzhetologiya i syuzhetografiya [Studies in Theory of Literary Plot and Narratology], 2014, no. 2, p. 22–28. (in Russ.)

Nepomnyashchikh N. A. Syuzhetnaya situatsiya vstrechi s lesnym otshel’nikom i zhitiynaya topika v proizvedeniyakh N. S. Leskova i L. M. Leonova [The plot situation of the meeting with the forest hermit and the life topic in the works of N. S. Leskov and L. M. Leonov]. In: Motivy russkoy literatury v tvorchestve L. M. Leonova [Motives of Russian literature in the works of L. M. Leonov], Novosibirsk, 2011, p. 62–70. (in Russ.)

Podlubnova Yu. S. Metazhanry v russkoy literature 1920 – nachala 1940-kh godov (kommunisticheskaya agiografiya i evropeyskaya skazka-allegoriya) [Metagenres in Russian literature 1920 – early 1940s (Communist hagiography and European fairy tale allegory)]. Philol. Cand. Diss. Ekaterinburg, 2005, 218 p. (in Russ.)

Ranchin A. M. Transformatsii agiograficheskogo koda v “Ocharovannom strannike” i printsip ambivalentnosti v poetike N. S. Leskova [Transformations of the Hagiographic Code in The Enchanted Wanderer and the Principle of Ambivalence in the Poetics of Nikolai Leskov]. Slověne, 2017, no. 2, p. 413–443. (in Russ.)

Rudy T. R. Topika russkikh zhitiy (voprosy tipologii). In: Russkaya agiografiya. Issledovaniya. Publikatsii. Polemika [Russian hagiography. Researches. Publications. Controversy]. St. Petersburg, 2005, vol. 1, p. 59–101. (in Russ.)

Sofronova L. A. K istorii sovetskoy agiografii. In: Znakomyy neznakomets. Sotsrealizm kak istoriko-kul’turnaya problema [Familiar stranger. Socialist realism as a historical and cultural problem]. Moscow, 1995, p. 91–99. (in Russ.)

Sokolova L. V. Dukhovno-nravstvennye iskaniya pisateley-traditsionalistov vtoroy poloviny XX veka (V. Shukshin, V. Rasputin, V. Belov, V. Astafyev) [Spiritual and moral searches of traditionalist writers of the second half of the 20th century (V. Shukshin, V. Rasputin, V. Belov, V. Astafyev)]. Abstract of Philol. Prof. Diss. St. Petersburg, 2005. (in Russ.)

Vasiliev V. K. Syuzhetnaya tipologiya russkoy literatury XI–XX vekov (arkhetipy russkoy kul’tury) [The plot typology of Russian literature 11th – 20th centuries (archetypes of Russian culture)]. Krasnoyarsk, SFU Publ., 2009, 260 p. (in Russ.)

Vodolazkin E. G. Obraz Serafima Sarovskogo v “Zapechatlennom angele” N. S. Leskova. Russkaya literatura [Russian Literature], 1997, no. 3, p. 136–141. (in Russ.)