![]() |
|
||||||||||||
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences |
|
||||||||||||
|
![]() | |
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737 Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 | |
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics) | |
![]() |
|
Article
Authors: Arina G. Zhukova, Olga I. Severskaya Pushkin State Russian Language Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation; Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract: The article presents a model of the pragmaticon of the “epistolary” linguistic personality of A. S. Pushkin, reflected in the assessments of letters, correspondence, addressees and in the language of writing. With the help of corpus tools, the compositional elements of letters and the choice of etiquette formulas, their genre features, speech modeling of images of the addressee and addressee, non-verbal elements of correspondence are studied, evaluative epithets characterizing the letter are considered, the principles of epistolary politeness are determined. The authors pay special attention to the correlation between Pushkin’s “epistolary code” and the norms of correspondence reflected in the Letter Books of 1822 and 1877, and see the influence of A. S. Pushkin on the development of epistolary styles, genres and norms in the democratization of official style, the distinction between external and internal business correspondence and friendly letters on business, in the semantic development of epistolary terminology. Keywords: letters of A. S. Pushkin, pragmaticon of linguistic personality, pragmatics of written communication, epistolary norm, politeness in correspondence, corpus study Bibliography: Akimova T. P. Otrazhenie konventsii epistolyarnogo obshcheniya v russkom chastnom pis'me: opyt kommunikativno-pragmaticheskogo opisaniya [Reflection of conventions of epistolary communication in Russian private letter: an experience of communicative-pragmatic description]. Uchenye zapiski Zabaikal'skogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarno-pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya, istoriya, vostokovedenie [Proceedings of the Zabaikalsky State Humanitarian and Pedagogical University. Series: Philology, history, oriental studies], 2011, no. 2, pp. 7–10. (in Russ.) Arutyunova N. D. Tipy yazykovykh znachenii. Otsenka. Sobytie. Fakt [Types of linguistic meanings. Assessment. Event. Fact]. Moscow, Nauka, 1988, 339 p. (in Russ.) Barthes R. Le plaisir du texte. Paris, Seuil, 1973, 105 p. Danilenko V. P. Blesk ostroumiya A. S. Pushkina v pis'makh k P. A. Vyazemskomu i N. N. Pushkinoi [The Brilliance of A.S. Pushkin’s Wit in Letters to P. A. Vyazemsky and N. N. Pushkina]. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Irkutsk State Linguistic University], 2012, no. 4, pp. 211–217. (in Russ.) Ermolenko S. I., Tretyakova O. V. “” A. S. Pushkina: “novye uzory” po “staroi knave” [“” by A. S. Pushkin: “New Patterns” on the “Old Canvas”]. Ural'skii filologicheskii vestnik [Ural Philological Bulletin], 2013, no. 1, pp. 22–39. (in Russ.) Gorlova G. N. Rechevoi zhanr “druzheskoe pis'mo” v kontekste problemy formirovaniya russkoi rechevoi kul'tury [The Speech Genre “Friendly Letter” in the Context of the Problem of Formation of Russian Speech Culture]. Gumanitarnye issledovaniya [Humanitarian Studies], 2014, no. 4, pp. 38–43. (in Russ.) Grigoryeva T. M. “Dvizhushchaya, raskrytaya ispoved'” (istoriya russkoi epistolyarnoi kul'tury punktirom) [“Moving, Revealed Confession” (a dotted history of Russian epistolary culture)]. Filologiya i chelovek [Philology and Man], 2016, no. 2, pp. 63–72. (in Russ.) Karaulov Yu. N. Russkii yazyk i yazykovaya lichnost' [Russian language and linguistic personality]. Moscow, Nauka, 1987, 168 p. (in Russ.) Kaizer L. E. Rechevoi etiket v pis'makh A. S. Pushkina [Speech etiquette in the letters of A. S. Pushkin]. Kul'tura i tekst [Culture and text], 1999, no. 5, pp. 47–60. (in Russ.) Leshutina I. A. Konstanty i peremennye russkoi “pochtovoy prozy” pervoi treti XIX stoletiya [Constants and variables of Russian “postal prose” of the first third of the 19th century]. Abstract of Philol. Dr. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 2006, 34 p. (in Russ.) Rusanova S. V. Rechevoi etiket pis'mennoi delovoi kommunikatsii XVIII v. kak lingvokul'turnyi fenomen i ob"ekt nauchnogo izucheniya [Speech Etiquette of Written Business Communication in the 18th Century as a Linguocultural Phenomenon and an Object of Scientific Study]. Uchenye zapiski Novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. Yaroslava Mudrogo [Proceedings of the Yaroslav the Wise Novgorod State University], 2020, no. 1, pp. 1–4. (in Russ.) Surovtseva E. V. Pis'ma vo vlast' v epistolyarnom nasledii A. S. Pushkina [Letters to the authorities in the epistolary heritage of A. S. Pushkin]. Izvestiya Yuzhnogo Federal'nogo universiteta Filologicheskiye nauki [Bulletin of the Southern Federal University. Philological sciences], 2020, no. 3, pp. 112–119. (in Russ.) |
![]() |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |