Article

Name: Metadrama in V. Mirzoev’s Works

Authors: Pavel E. Zhilichev

Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

Abstract:

This paper deals with the specifics of metadrama in Vladimir Mirzoev's works. The metatextual aspect of the communicative structure of Mirzoev’s plays is based on uti-lizing traditional actants of the dramatic intrigue, including kings, jesters, army officers, magicians, Hamlet, Don Juan, etc. Mixing references to classic and contemporary literature, Mirzoev’s texts take palimpsest (G. Genette), pastiche (R. Dyer) as a basis for developing dramatic action and tension. For example, The Tower decon-structs the archetype of Don Juan by combining the elements of the traditional plot with the iconography of the Tarot, references to well-known Russian classics, and elements of avant-garde aesthetics. Moreover, another “layer” of the “palimpsest” is formed by interactions with the “absurd authors of the past” (Harms, Pinter), weaving the position of interpretation (philological, directorial) into the discursive structure. Overall, the usage of palimpsest and pastiche corresponds with the dramatic intrigue of metamorphosis, the depiction of an absurdist cosmogony of a fictional world that stands on the deconstruction of cultural cliches and re-shaping the consciousness of both the characters and the recipients

Keywords: absurd, Mirzoev, metadrama, metatheater, pastiche, palimpsest

Bibliography:

Abel L. Metatheatre: A New View of Dramatic Form. New York, Holmes & Meier Publ., 2003, 208 p.

Burenina O. Chto takoe absurd, ili Po sledam Martina Esslina [What is Ab-surd, or In the Footsteps of Martin Esslin]. In: Burenina O. (ed.) Absurd i vokrug [Absurd and Beyond]. Moscow, Languages of Slavic Сultures, 2004, pp. 7–75. (in Russ.)

Dyer R. Pastiche. London and New York, Routledge, 2006, 224 p. (Russ. ed.: Dyer R. Pastish. Moscow, HSE Publ., 2021, 344 p.)

Esslin M. The Theatre of the Absurd. Garden City & New York, Doubleday, 1961, 364 p. (Russ. ed.: Esslin M. Teatr absurda. St. Petersburg, Baltic Seasons Publ., 2010, 528 p.)

Hansen-Löve O. Intermedialnost' v russkoj kulture. Ot simvolizma k avangardu [Intermediary in Russian Culture. From Symbolism to Avantgarde]. Mos-cow, RSUH Publ., 2016, 450 p.

Kogan P. Ocherki po istorii zapadnoevropeyskogo teatra [Essays of the His-tory of Theater in Western Europe]. Moscow, Urait Publ., 2020, 173 p. (in Russ.)

Kuzina N. V., Kuzina L. B. “Etyudy o svobode” V. Mirzoeva kak triptikh dramy absurda i tsikl kinonovell [V. Mirzoev’s “Études on Freedom” as an Ab-surdist Tryptich and as a Series of Cinematic Stories]. Culture an Art, 2018, no. 6, pp. 55–65. (in Russ.) DOI 10.7256/2454-0625.2018.6.26582

Loshchilov I. E. XX Ploskost' sverkhpovesti Velimira Khlebnikova “Zangezi” (“Gore i smekh”) i ee “razvitie” u poetov OBERIU (1927–1929) [XX Plane of Velimir Khlebnikov’s Superstory “Zangezi” (“Woe and Laughter”) and its Development by the Authors of OBERIU]. In: Velimir Khlebnikov, poète futurien. Modernitès russes 8. Lyon, Université Jean Moulin Lyon, 2009,< pp. 407–435. (in Russ.)

Meyerkhold V. Lektsii: 1918–1919 [Lectures: 1918–1919]. Moscow, OGI Publ., 2001, 280 p. (in Russ.)

Senderovich S., Shwartz E. Sok tryokh apel’sinov. Nabokov i russskiy teatral’ny avangard [The Juice of The Three Citrons. Nabokov and Russian Theatrical Avant-garde]. In: Levin Yu., Soshkina E. (eds.) Imperiya N. Nabokov i nasledniki [Empire N. Nabokov and Heirs]. Moscow, The New Literary Observer Publ., 2006, pp. 293–347.

Shatin Yu. Kontsept serdtse i jego khudozhestvennaja dekonstruktsija v russkoj poezii XX veka [The Concept of Heart and Its Artistic Deconstruction in Russian Poetry of the 20th Century]. Critique and Semiotics, 2011, no. 15, pp. 189–196. (in Russ.)

Silard L. Germetizm i germenevtika [Hermetism and Hermeneutics]. St. Pe-tersburg, Ivan Limbakh Publ., 2002, 328 p. (in Russ.)

Sukhotin M. Dva Don Zhuana [Two Don Juans]. Russian Journal, 3 August 1999. (in Russ.) URL: http://old.russ./krug/19990803_s.html (accessed: 15.10. 2021).

Tarkovsky A. Lektsii po kinorezhissure [Lectures on Film Directing]. Len-ingrad, Lenfilm Publ., 1989, 118 p. (in Russ.)

Vislova А. V. Russkiy teatr na slome epokh. Rubezh XX–XXI vekov [Rus-sian Theater at the Edge of an Epoch. The Cusp of the 20th and 21st Centuries]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2009, 272 p. (in Russ.)

Wiener N. God & Golem, Inc. A Comment on Certain Points where Cyber-netics Impinges on Religion. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press, 1964, 99 p. (Russ. ed.: Wiener N. Tvorets i robot. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1966, 104 p.)

Yampolsky M. Bespamyatstvo kak istok (chitaya Kharmsa) [Unconscious-ness as a Source (Reading Kharms)]. Moscow, The New Literary Observer Publ., 384 p. (in Russ.)

Zhilicheva G. A. Narrativnye strategii v zhanrovoy strukture romana (na materiale russkoy prozy 1920–1950-kh gg.) [Narrative Strategies in the Genre Structure of a Novel (based on the material from Russian prose of the 1920–1950s]. Novosibirsk, NSPU Publ., 2013, 317 p. (in Russ.)