Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737
Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics)
По-русски
Archive
Submission requirements
Process for Submission and Publication
Editor′s office
Editorial Board and Editorial Council
Our ethical principles
Search:


Email: silantev@post.nsu.ru

Article

Name: “Bobok” of Dostoevsky: An Artistic Phenomenon in the System of the Whole

Authors: Yurii V. Shatin

Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation;

Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

Issue 1, 2022Pages 216-227
UDK: 882DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737-2022-1-216-227

Abstract: The complexity of genre nature of Dostoevsky’s short story “Bobok”, which causes controversy among researchers, largely ignores the duality of this text, which, on the one hand, is complete artistic phenomenon, and on other – part of the whole “Diary of the writer for1873”. In the article, based on the principles of discursive analysis, we tried to describe this duality as the intersection of the mechanisms of rhetoric and poetics. Thanks to the rhetorical component, Dostoevsky managed to fit “Bobok” into the general polemical context of the Russian journalism of 1870s. On the country, the use special poetics allowed the writer to discover a new principle of physicality in Russian literature, which in many ways anticipated the search for postmodernism at the end of the twenties century.

Keywords: rhetoric, poetics, discursive analysis, physicality

Bibliography:

Bakhtin M. M. Sobranie soshineniy. In 7 vols. Moscow, 2002, vol. 6. (in Russ.)

Belyy A. Stikhotvoreniya i poemy. Moscow, Leningrad, 1966. (in Russ.)

Belyy A. Tragediya tvorchestva. Dostoevsky i Tolstoy. Moscow, 1911. (in Russ.)

Dostoevsky F. M. Dnevnik pisatelya za 1873 god. In: Dostoevsky F. M. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. In 30 vols. Leningrad, 1980, vol. 21. (in Russ.)

Jackson R. Iskusstvo Dostoevskogo. Bredy i nokturny. Moscow, 1998. (in Russ.)

Khamitov M. R. Razgovory v tsarstve mertvykh: “Bobok” Dostoevskogo. In: Dostoevsky. Materialy i issledovaniya. St. Petersburg, 2016, vol. 21. (in Russ).

Makarov A. I., Toropova A. A. Otchuzhdenie tela. Traktovka telesnosti v postmodernizme. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seria 7. Filolosofia, 2016, no. 4 (34), pp. 16–26. (in Russ.)

Podoroga V. A. Fenomenologia tela. Vvedenie v filosofskuyu antropologiyu. Moscow, 1995. (in Russ.)

Saltykov E. Letters. In: Saltykov-Schedrin M. E. Articles. Materials. Bibliography. Moscow, 1976. (in Russ.)

Soloviev V. S. Predislovie k povesti A. K. Tolstogo “Upyr`”. In: Soloviev V. S. Sobranie sochineniy. In 9 vols. Brussels, 1966, vol. 9. (in Russ)

Todorov Ts. Vvedenie v fantasticheskuyu literaturu. Moscow, 1999. (in Russ.)

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology