Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737
Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics)
По-русски
Archive
Submission requirements
Process for Submission and Publication
Editor′s office
Editorial Board and Editorial Council
Our ethical principles
Search:


Email: silantev@post.nsu.ru

Article

Name: Adverbs of Evaluation: Correlation of Semantic and Syntactic Properties (The Case of General and Hedonistic Evaluation)

Authors: Irina M. Kobozeva

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation;

Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation

Issue 1, 2022Pages 90-109
UDK: 81'37DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737-2022-1-90-109

Abstract:

Considering evaluation adverbs of Russian expressing two types of evaluation we argue that the syntactic properties of adverbs are determined by their meaning. The hypothesis is that adverbs of general evaluation (the type goodbad) should have more syntactic functions, than the ones of particularized evaluation, and for this purpose adverbs of hedonistic evaluation (e.g. tasty) are studied. We briefly expose the main insights of linguistic-oriented evaluation theory of N. D. Arutyunova, and discuss syntactic functions of хорошо ‘good’, typical of general evaluation adverbs. Section 2 is devoted to adverbs of hedonistic evaluation. We argue that adverbs of the type приятно – неприятно ‘pleasant – unpleasant’ should be excluded from this class, because in their lexical meaning only the general sensory evaluation is fixed, while its specification as hedonistic or psychological is conditioned by syntactic and/or semantic context. We show that hedonistic evaluation adverbs possess lesser number of syntactic functions than general evaluation adverbs. We demonstrate syntactic differences in the degree of acceptability of the explicit experiencer and the implicit causing factor with the hedonistic evaluation adverbs, conditioned by the channel of perception encoded in adverb’s lexical meaning, and give them the cognitive explanation. The results of our analysis bring into question the syntactic criterion of adverbs with floating scope proposed by M. V. Filipenko (2003). According to this criterion the adverbs of taste and smell evaluation should have floating scope because they have predicative function, but as all hedonistic evaluation adverbs they have the fixed scope over the semantic predicate ‘feel’ implicit in their meaning.

We argue that the only syntactic property that guarantees the floating scope for an adverb is its ability to govern the subordinate complement clause with the complementizer chto ‘that’.

Keywords: evaluation adverbs, general evaluation, hedonistic adverbs, syntax, semantics, floating scope, fixed scope

Bibliography:

Apresyan Yu. D. Issledovaniya po semantike i leksikografii. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur Publ., 2009, vol. 1, 568 p. (in Russ.)

Arutyunova N. D. Tipy yazykovykh znacheniy: Otsenka. Sobytiye. Fakt. Moscow, Nauka, 1988, 341 p. (in Russ.)

Cinque G. Adverbs and functional heads: a crosslinguistic perspective. New York, Охford, Oxford Uni. Press, 1999, 288 p.

Filipenko M. V. Semantika narechiy i adverbialnykh vyrazheniy. Moscow, Azbukovnik, 2003, 304 р. (in Russ.)

Grashchenkov P. V., Kobozeva I. M. Semantic classes and government of adjectives. In: Komp’yuternaya Lingvistika i Intellektual’nye Tehnologii. Moscow, 2017, vol. 2, pp. 134–149. (in Russ.)

Kobozeva I. M. Svet, zvuk i zapakh v ikh yazykovoy interpretatsii (po dannym russkikh glagolov emissii). In: Problemy interpretatsionnoy lingvistiki: tipy vospriyatiya i ikh yazykovoye voploshcheniye. Novosibirsk, NSPU Press, 2013, pp. 5–28. (in Russ.)

Shvedovа N. Yu. (ed.). Russkaya grammatika. Moscow, Nauka, 1980, vol. 1. (in Russ.)

Tsimmerling A. V. Ot integralnogo k aspektivnomu. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 2021, 652 p. (in Russ.)

Wezhbitska A. Vospriyatie: semantika abstraktnogo slovarya. In: Novoye

v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Moscow, Progress, 1986, iss. 18, pp. 336–370. (in Russ.)

Wright G. H., von. The varieties of goodness. New York, Routledge, 1963, 222 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology