|
|||||||||||||
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences |
|
||||||||||||
|
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737 Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 | |
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics) | |
|
ArticleName: Dynamic Processes in Russian Emotive-Evaluative Vocabulary Authors: Elena Yu. Bulygina, Tatiana A. Tripolskaya Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Abstract: Modern studies of the dynamic processes of the emotive-evaluative vocabulary are determined by 1) ideas about the nature and structure of the pragmatic macro-component and its interaction with the denotative semantics of the word, 2) the emergence of new vocabulary and text sources, 3) taking into account the parameters of the communicative situation (the relationship between the subject and the object of assessment, gender, age, social position of speakers and their intentions). The use of corpus and experimental methods in the study of evaluation makes it possible to identify significant changes in the semantics of different categories of vocabulary. In this article, the evaluative semantics is considered in relation to the elements of denotative and / or pragmatic gender, social and age macrocomponents. It has been revealed that the axiological characterization of a word, changing under the influence of the gender component, becomes significantly more complicated and varies depending on WHO (a man or a woman) evaluates and WHOM (a man or a woman) the speaker characterizes. In the thematic group ‘A weak-willed, spineless and feeble person’, there are dynamic processes, which are manifested in seme and semantic variation (the “male” characteristics tryapka, kisel', etc.), demonstrate an expansion of gender semantics, correlating with persons of both sexes. Thus, in the semantic structure of evaluative metaphors, independent evaluative meanings are formed, representing male and female weaknesses in different ways. Keywords: dynamic processes, gender and evaluative semantics, corpus and psycho-linguistic methods Bibliography: Basalaeva E. G. Pragmaticheskiy makrokomponent i sposoby ego semantizatsii v elektronnoy baze dannykh [The pragmatic component and ways of its semantization in the electronic database]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin], 2016, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 112–125. (in Russ.) DOI 10.15293/2226-3365.1606.09 Bulygina E. Yu., Tripolskaya T. A. Baza dannykh pragmaticheski markirovannoy leksiki russkogo yazyka: material, printsipy opisaniya, vozmozhnosti ispol'zovaniya [A Database of pragmatically marked lexical items of the Russian language: the content, principles of description, and possibility of using]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin], 2016, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 70–85. (in Russ.) DOI 10.15293/2226-3365.1606.06 Bulygina E. Yu., Tripolskaya T. A. Gendernyy komponent v semantike slova i sposoby ego leksikografirovaniya v slovaryakh aktivnogo tipa [The Gender Component in the Semantics of an Emotive-Evaluative Words and Ways of Presenting it in the Active Type Dictionary]. In: Sovremennyye problemy slavyanskoy filologii: transformatsiya tsennostey v slavyanskikh yazykakh i kulturakh [Modern problems of Slavic philology: transformation of values in Slavic languages and cultures]. Taipei, 2017, pp. 50‒62. (in Russ.) URL: http:// conference.nccu.edu.tw/actnews/intro.php?Sn=153&OSn=595 Bulygina E. Yu., Tripolskaya T. A. Dictionary of emotional-evaluative words in paradigm of active lexicography. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, 2017, vol. 16, no. 9: Philology, pp. 11‒21. (in Russ.) Channell J. Evaluation in text: authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Ed. by S. Hunston and G. Thompson. Oxford University Press, 2000. Garbuio I. Floristicheskaya metafora v russkom i ital`yanskom yazykakh [Floristic metaphor in the Russian and Italian languages]. Izvestiya Ural`skogo federal`nogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Gumanitarnyye nauki [Bulletin of the Ural Federal University. Series 2, Humanities], 2015, no. 3 (142), pp. 218‒227. (in Russ.) Gutman E. A., Litvin F. A., Cheremisina M. I. Sopostavitel`nyy analiz zoomorfnykh kharakteristik (na materiale russkogo, angliyskogo i frantsuzskogo yazykov) [Comparative analysis of zoomorphic characteristics (based on the Russian, English and French languages)]. In: Leontyev A. A., Sorokin Yu. A., Tarasov E. F. (eds.). Natsional`no-kul`turnaya spetsifika rechevogo povedeniya. [National-cultural specifics of speech behavior]. Moscow, Nauka, 1977, pp. 147‒166. (in Russ.) Hunston S. Corpus approaches to evaluation. Phraseology and evaluative language. New York, Routledge, 2011. Lappo M. A. Struktura pragmaticheskogo makrokomponenta znacheniya (na materiale gruppy slov, oboznachayushchikh natsional`nosti) [The structure of the pragmatic macrocomponent of meaning (with the main focus on words denoting nationality)]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin], 2016, vol. 6, no. 6, p. 186–200. (in Russ.) DOI 10.15293/2226-3365.1606.15 Mussi V. Entomologicheskie metafory v russkoy i ital'yanskoy kartinakh mira [Entomological metaphors in Russian and Italian pictures of the world]. Moscow, Flinta, 2019. (in Russ.) |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |