Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737
Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics)
По-русски
Archive
Submission requirements
Process for Submission and Publication
Editor′s office
Editorial Board and Editorial Council
Our ethical principles
Search:


Email: silantev@post.nsu.ru

Article

Name: Reality as Project: Towards a Poetic and Political Epistemology of the Romantic World (“What is to be Done?” by N. G. Chernyshevsky and “The Demons” by F. M. Dostoevsky)

Authors: Anatoly V. Korchinsky

Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russian Federation

Issue 2, 2021Pages 320-335
UDK: 821.161.1 DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737-2021-2-320-335

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to test the hypothesis that Dostoevsky, in “The Demons”, attempts to challenge the “nihilistic” worldview (of which author of the novel “What Is To Be Done?” is the greatest representative in his view) not on the level of separate ideas and images, or even their system, but on the narrative construction of the novel reality itself. From this perspective, the task of both novels is not the portrayal of a present reality and an ideal opposed to it, but an experimental description of how this reality can be changed, directing – in one case – towards a better future or – in the other case – towards catastrophe. But what is interesting, above all, is not how this task is resolved in the plot of these novels ("new people" want to remake the world – what will come of it?), but rather the way this task transforms the narrative structure and the metafictional structure of both works.

Keywords: reality, reality, narrative, diegetic world, authenticity, Russian novel, realism, Chernyshevsky, Dostoevsky, literary epistemology

Bibliography:

Bakhtin M. M. Collected Works. In 7 vols. Moscow, 2000, vol. 2. (in Russ.)

Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost’ [Liquid modernity]. St. Petersburg, 2008, 240 p. (in Russ.)

Chernyshevsky N. G. Chto delat’? [What is to be Done?]. Leningrad, 1975, 872 p. (in Russ.)

Dostoevsky F. M. Collected Works. In 30 vols. Leningrad, 1974, vol. 10; 1986, vol. 29, book 1. (in Russ.)

Herlth J. Khronotop katastrofy i roman vospitaniya [The chronotope of catastrophe and the education novel]. In: Istoriya, pamyat’, identichnost’. Teoreticheskiye osnovaniya i issledovatel’skiye praktiki [History, Memory, Identity.

Theoretical foundations and research practices]. Moscow, 2016, pp. 420–423. (in Russ.)

Korchinsky A. V. Politika polifonii: opasnaya sovremennost’ i struktura romana u Dostoyevskogo i Bakhtina [Politics of polyphony: dangerous modernity and the structure of the novel in Dostoevsky and Bakhtin]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Observer], 2019, vol. 155, pp. 27–41. (in Russ.)

Lounsbery A. Print Culture and Real Life in Dostoevsky’s Demons. Dostoevsky Studies, 2007, vol. 11, pp. 25–37.

Mikhaylov A. V. Obratnyy perevod. Russkaya i zapadnoyevropeyskaya kul’tura: problemy vzaimosvyazey [Reverse Translation. Russian and Western European Culture: Problems of Interconnection]. Moscow, 2000, 852 p. (in Russ.)

Nazirov R. G. Petr Verkhovenskiy kak estet [Peter Verkhovensky as an aesthete]. In: Nazirov R. G. Russkaya klassicheskaya literatura: sravnitel’no-istoricheskiy podkhod. Issledovaniya raznykh let [Russian classical literaturea comparative-historical approach. Studies of different years]. Ufa, 2005, pp. 79–93. (in Russ.)

Paperno I. Semiotika povedeniya: Nikolay Chernyshevskiy – chelovek epokhi realizma [Semiotics of Behaviour: Nikolai Chernyshevsky – A Man of Realism]. Moscow, 1996, 208 p. (in Russ.)

Pirusskaya T. A. Spletnya kak avtorefleksivnyy mekhanizm v romanakh Dostoyevskogo “Besy” i Dzhordzh Eliot “Midlmarch” [Gossip as an autoreflexive mechanism in Dostoevsky’s novels “The Demons” and George Eliot’s “Middlemarch”]. Voprosy literatury [Questions of Literature], 2015, no. 2, pp. 193–216. (in Russ.)

Saraskina L. “Besy”: roman-preduprezhdeniye [The Demons: A novel of warning]. Moscow, 1990, 478 p. (in Russ.)

Simonova L. Kh. Iz vospominaniy o Fedore Mikhayloviche Dostoyevskom [From memories of Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoyevsky]. Tserkovno-obshchestvennyy vestnik [Church and Society Bulletin], 1881, no. 17, pp. 4–5. (in Russ.)

Tamarchenko N. D. Russkiy bunt u Pushkina i Dostoyevskogo (“Kapitanskaya dochka” i “Besy”) [The Russian Rebellion in Pushkin and Dostoyevsky (“The Captain’s Daughter” and “The Demons”)]. Novyy filologicheskiy vestnik [The New Philological Bulletin], 2009, no. 4 (11), pp. 18–24. (in Russ.)

Thanner V., Vogl J., Walzer D. (Hrsg.). Die Wirklichkeit des Realismus. Paderborn, 2018.:

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology