Article

Name: Interdiscursive Parameters of Linguistic Creativity (The Case Study of Cinematic Discourse)

Authors: Irina V. Zykova

Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation

Abstract: The research aims at elaborating the theory of linguistic creativity and a common methodology of studying linguocreative phenomena in different discourses. For further development of a multi-level system of parameters of linguistic creativity described in ourprevious works, the present paper studies in detail the parameters of an interdiscursive level, in particular, how they are activated in the cinematic discourse. The applied analytical algorithm helps to define the notion of an interdiscursive parameter and establish the artistic-aesthetic strategies that are used to construct innovative verbal systems of the films under study. Special attention is paid to the films’ systematization that helps to reveal their complex interdiscursive character. The research results in establishing certain types of interdiscursive insertions, e.g., homogeneous vs. heterogeneous insertions; diegetic vs non-diegetic insertions; authentically reproduced insertions and others. All the types of interdiscursive insertions represent different forms of realizing the creative potential of the language. The main conclusion of the research is that the integration of different discourses into a film can be qualified as a process of their linguocreative appropriation.

Keywords: interdiscursive parameter, cinematic discourse, linguistic creativity, method of discourse-parametric analysis, corpus annotation, linguocreative appropriation

Bibliography:

Chernyavskaya V. E. Lingvistika teksta: polikodovost’, intertekstual’nost’,

interdiskursivnost’ [Linguistics of the text: Polycode, intertextuality, interdiscursivity]. Moscow, 2009, 245 p. (in Russ.)

Karasik V. I. Yazykovoj krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [Language circle: Personality, concepts, discourse]. Moscow, 2004, 389 p. (in Russ.)

Olizko N. S. Semiotiko-sinergeticheskaya interpretatsiya osobennostej realizatsii kategorij intertekstual'nosti i interdiskursivnosti v postmodernistskom khudozhestvennom diskurse [The semiotic-synergetic interpretation of realizing the categories of intertextuality and interdiscursivity in postmodern art discourse]. Doc. Philol. Diss. Chelyabinsk, 2009, 343 p. (in Russ.)

Prokhorov A. Unasledovannyj diskurs: paradigmy stalinskoj kul'tury v literature i kinematografe “ottepeli” [Inherited discourse: Paradigms of Stalinistculture in thaw literature and cinema]. St. Petersburg, Akademicheskij proekt, 2007, 344 p. (in Russ.)

Rusinova E. A. Sposoby vizual’nogo i audial’nogo razgranicheniya diegezisa i metadiegezisa v kinoproizvedenii [Methods of visual and auditory differentiation of diegesis and metadiegesis in film production]. Vestnik VGIK, 2017, no. 1 (31), pp. 20–26. (in Russ.)

Silantev I. V. Gazeta i roman: rhetorika diskursnykh smesheniy [Newspaper and novel: rhetoric of discourse blending]. Moscow, 2006, 224 p. (in Russ.)

Sokolova O. V. Tipologiya diskursov aktivnogo vozdejstviya: poeticheskij avangard, reklama i PR [Typology of active influence discourses: poetic avantgarde, advertising and PR]. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2014, 304 p. (in Russ.)

Woll J. Real Images: Soviet Cinema and the Thaw. London, New York,2000, 267 p.

Zykova I. V. Metodologicheskie vektory izucheniya lingvisticheskoj kreativnosti v kinodiskurse [Methodological vectors of the study of linguistic creativity in cinematic discourse]. Ural Philological Bulletin. Series: Language. System. Personality: the linguistics of creativity, 2020, no. 29, pp. 23–36. (in Russ.)

Zykova I. V., Kiose М. I. Parametrizatsiya lingvisticheskoj kreativnosti v mezhdiskursivnom aspekte: kinodiskurs vs diskurs detskoj literatury [Linguistic creativity parametrization in contrasting discourse types: Cinematic discourse vs discourse of children’s literature]. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2020, vol. 2, pp. 26–40. (in Russ.)