|
|||||||||||||
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences |
|
||||||||||||
|
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737 Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 | |
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics) | |
|
ArticleAuthors: Institute of Philology SB RAS
Abstract: In the following article, we analyze the verb-based analytical formations in Turkic languages, as well as the possible principles of distinction between analytical verbs and phraseological combinations. Both of these have fairly well-defined core elements that fully correspond to all typical markers of such constructions, as well as peripheral elements, where the components may be more or less loose. For example, in certain peripheral units, one may observe one or two, and sometimes even three, markers of word-groups (syntactic independence, permeability, and separateness); they are close to idioms, namely phraseological combinations. However, in many Turkic combinations which do not correspond to some principles of complex word distinction, the inner connection between their elements appears to be tighter than that in Russian phraseological combinations. This is particularly true for the formations including auxiliary verbs эт= / ит= and бол= / пол=, possibly due to their highly generalized semantics. In some cases, these constructions may be hard to distinguish. The main criterion of their distinction is the absence of several markers of complex words or phraseological combinations, as well as analytical type of meaning. In our article, we analyze the transitional cases between analytical verbs, phraseological combinations, and idioms. We also analyze an important trait of phraseological combinations, namely their ability to carry lexical-grammatical, word-formative and paradigmatic meanings (as noted by V. G. Gak) which are not expressed by individual words that serve as their synthetic parallels (denoting phases of action and genus relations). This function is performed by the partially desemantisized verb component, while the nominal component serves as the semantic key, the basic word. As our study shows, in various Turkic languages, the models of formation of analytical verbs and phraseological combinations are largely the same. In some cases, one may observe corresponding constructions with similar semantics and differing in mutual or similar components, meaning that these models are generally quite stable in Turkic languages. Keywords: analytical verbs, complex words, phraseological combinations, Turkic languages, Altai languages, Khakas language, lexical-grammatical meanings Bibliography: Baskakov N. A. Karakalpakskiy yazyk. Fonetika i morfologiya. Chast' 1 (chasti rechi i slovoobrazovanie) [The Karakalpak Language. Phonetics and Morphology. Part 1 (Parts of Speech and Word Formation)]. Moscow, 1952, 409 p. (in Russ.) Bertagaev T. A. Leksika sovremennykh mongol'skikh literaturnykh yazykov (na materiale mongol'skogo i buryatskogo yazykov) [Modern Literary Mongolian Lexis (on Mongolian and Buryat Material)]. Moscow, Nauka, 1974, 383 p. (in Russ.) Chertykova M. D. Leksiko-semanticheskie gruppy glagolov khakasskogo yazyka (glagoly so znacheniem psikhicheskoy deyatel'nosti) [Lexical-Semantic Groups of Khakas Verbs (Verbs Denoting Psychic Activity)]. A Dictionary. Abakan, 2016. 172 p. (in Russ.) Chugunekova A. N. Slozhnye glagoly dvizheniya v khakasskom yazyke [Complex Verbs of Motion in the Khakas Language]. In: Materialy XXXVI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy studencheskoy konferentsii «Student i nauchno-tekhnicheskiy progress» [Materials of the XXXVI International Academic Students' Conference Student and the Scientific- Technical Progress]. Novosibirsk, 1998, p. 60–61. (in Russ.) Darzhay A. V. Modeli glagolov v tuvinskom yazyke, obrazovannye ot podrazhatel'nykh slov [Models of Tuvan Verbs Derived from Imitative Words]. In: Tuvinskaya pis'mennost' i voprosy issledovaniya pis'mennostey i pis'mennykh pamyatnikov Rossii i Tsentral'noAziatskogo regiona [Tuvan Writing System and Issues of Research of Writing Systems and Written Monuments in Russia and Central Asia]. Materials of an International Academic Conference Dedicated to Tuvan Writing System's 80th Anniversary (Kyzyl, July 1-4, 2010). Abakan, 2010, pt. 1, p. 79–84. (in Russ.) Gak V. G. Sopostavitel'naya leksikologiya. Na materiale frantsuzskogo i russkogo yazykov [Comparative Lexicology. On French and Russian Material]. Moscow, 1977, 264 p. (in Russ.) Ganiev F. A. Obrazovanie slozhnykh slov v tatarskom yazyke [Formation of Complex Words in the Tatar Language]. Moscow, Nauka, 1982, 150 p. (in Russ.) Grammatika sovremennogo altayskogo yazyka. Morfologiya [Modern Altai Grammar. Morphology]. Gorno-Altaysk, 2017, 576 p. (in Russ.) Grammatika sovremennogo yakutskogo literaturnogo yazyka. Fonetika i morfologiya [Modern Literary Yakut Grammar. Phonetics and Morphology]. Moscow, Nauka, 1982, 495 p. (in Russ.) Kasevich V. B. Trudy po yazykoznaniyu [Works on Linguistics]. St. Petersburg, 2006, p. 513– 522. (in Russ.) Kharitonov L. N. Formy glagol'nogo vida v yakutskom yazyke [Forms of Verb Aspect in the Yakut Language]. Moscow, Leningrad, 1960, 179 p. (in Russ.) Kononov A. N. Grammatika sovremennogo turetskogo literaturnogo yazyka [Modern Literary Turkish Grammar]. Moscow, Leningrad, 1956, 569 p. (in Russ.) Kraynyuchenko E. V. Sostavnye glagoly v turetskom yazyke [Complex Verbs in the Turkish Language]. In: Universitetskie chteniya – 2017. Pyatigorsk, 2017, p. 35–39. URL: https://pglu.ru/upload/iblock/cf4/Pages-from-CHast-5_7.pdf (accessed 25.10.2019) (in Russ.) Rassadin V. I. Morfologiya tofalarskogo yazyka v sravnitel'nom osveshchenii [Tofalar Grammar in the Comparative Aspect]. Moscow, Nauka, 1978, 286 p. (in Russ.) Rassadin V. I. Ocherki po morfologii i slovoobrazovaniyu mongol'skikh yazykov [Studies in Mongolian Morphology and Word Formation]. Elista, 2008, 232 p. (in Russ.) Shamina L. A. Analiticheskie grammaticheskie formy i konstruktsii v funktsii skazuemogo v tuvinskom yazyke [Analytical Grammatical Forms and Constructions Functioning as Predicates in the Tuvan Language]. Novosibirsk, 2010, 239 p. (in Russ.) Tatarskaya grammatika [Tatar Grammar]. Kazan, 1995, vol. 1, 582 p. (in Russ.) Teliya V. N. Russkaya frazeologiya. Semanticheskiy, pragmaticheskiy i lingvokul'- turologicheskiy aspekty [Russian Phraseology. Semantic, Pragmatic, and Linguoculturological Aspects]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul'tury Publ., 1996, 289 p. (in Russ.) Tybykova A. T. Issledovaniya po sintaksisu altayskogo yazyka. Prostoe predlozhenie [Studies in Altai Syntax. Simple Sentences]. Novosibirsk, 1991, 228 p. (in Russ.) Tybykova A. T. Sostavnye glagoly tipa imya + glagol s real'nym znacheniem v altayskom yazyke [Complex Verbs of the Noun + Verb Type with Real Meanings in the Altai Language]. In: Voprosy altayskogo yazykoznaniya [Issues of Altaistics]. Gorno- Altaysk, 1976, p. 71–88. (in Russ.) Tyuntesheva E. V. Chelovek i ego mir v zerkale frazeologii (na materiale tyurkskikh yazykov Sibiri, kazakhskogo i kirgizsckogo) [Humans and Their World in the Mirror of Phraseology (on the Material of Siberian Turkic Language, Kazakh and Kyrgyz)]. Novosibirsk, 2006, 224 p. (in Russ.) Ubryatova E. I. Parnye slova v yakutskom yazyke [Pair Words in the Yakut Language]. In: Yazyk i myshlenie [Language and Thinking]. V. XI. Moscow, Leningrad, 1948, p. 297–328. (in Russ.) Vinogradov V. V. Leksikologiya i leksikografiya: Izbrannye trudy [Lexicology and Lexicography: Selected Works]. Moscow, 1977, 310 p. (in Russ.) Yuldashev A. A. Sistema slovoobrazovaniya i spryazheniya glagola v bashkirskom yazyke [Bashkir System of Word Formation and Verb Conjugation]. Moscow, 1958, 195 p. (in Russ.) |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |