Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737
Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics)
По-русски
Archive
Submission requirements
Process for Submission and Publication
Editor′s office
Editorial Board and Editorial Council
Our ethical principles
Search:


Email: silantev@post.nsu.ru

Article

Name: Different Subject Constructions with Depictive Secondary Predicates in South Siberian Turkic

Authors: I. A. Nevskaya

Institute of Philology SB RAS

Issue 2, 2019Pages 327-344
UDK: 811.512.1’367DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737-2019-2-327-344

Abstract: Specific syntactic constructions of complex predicates that assign more than one predicate to their semantic subject are well known cross-linguistically. Examples of such constructions are structures such as He returned tired, lived alone, worked as a teacher, etc. They contain two semantic predicates – a main one expressed by a finite verb form, and a secondary one, often expressed by a nominal form or an infinite verb form. Our research has shown that depictive predicates have their structural and functional peculiarities in different South Siberian Turkic languages, compared between themselves and with depictives in Oguz and Kypchak languages. The article deals with South Siberian depictive secondary predicates and describes their semantic and structural types. A special attention is paid to depictive predicates having a subject, different from the subject of the main predicate.

Keywords: South Siberian Turkic languages, depictive secondary predicates, structural and semantic types, lexicalization

Bibliography:

Auwera J. van der, Malchukov A. A semantic map for depictive adjectival. In: Himmelmann N. P., Schultze-Bernd E. (eds.). Secondary predication and adverbial modification. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005, p. 393–421.

Cheremisina M. I. Deeprichastie kak klass form glagola v yazykakh raznykh system [Converbs as a class of verbal forms in languages of different systems]. In: Slozhnoe predlozhenie v yazykakh raznykh system [Complex sentences in languages of different systems]. Novosibirsk, NSU Press, 1977, p. 3–28. (in Russ.)

Halliday M. A. K. Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Part 1. Journal of Linguistics, 1967, no. 3, p. 37–81.

Haspelmath M. The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In: Haspelmath M., König, E. (eds.). Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, 1995, p. 1–56.

Koizumi M. Secondary predicates. Journal of East Asian linguistics, 1994, no. 3, p. 24–79.

Memtimin A., Nevskaya I. Depictive secondary predicates in Modern Uyghur. Turkic languages, 2012, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 80–94.

Nevskaya I. A. Deeprichastiya kak rezul'tativnye vtorostepennye predikaty v tyurkskikh yazykakh Yuzhnoy Sibiri [Converbs as resultative predicates in South Siberian Turkic]. In: Alkïš bitig. Scripta in honorem D. M. Nasilov. Sbornik statey k 80-letiyu D. M. Nasilova [A collection of articles on occasion of the 80th birthday of D. M. Nasilov]. Eds. A. Kh. Girfanova, I. A. Nevskaya, E. A. Oganova. Moscow, Izdatel'stvo MBA, 2015, p. 307–315. (in Russ.)

Nevskaya I. A. Depiktivnye vtorostepennye predikaty v tyurkskikh yazykakh [Turkic depictive secondary predicates]. In: Sinkhronnoe i diakhronnoe v sravnitel'no-istoricheskom yazykoznanii [Synchrony and diachrony in comparative linguistics]. Ed. by V. A. Kochergina. Moscow, Dobrosvet, 2011, p. 171–175. (in Russ.)

Nevskaya I. A. Osnovnye tipy imennykh i glagol'nykh skazuemykh v shorskom yazyke [Main types of nominal and verbal predicates in Shor]. In: Kachestvo podgotovki i problemy povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti vypusknikov pedvuzov na rynke truda. Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Quality of training teachers and raising their competitiveness on the labour market]. Eds. S. M. Redlikha et al. Novokuznetsk, NSPI Press, 1998, p. 64–71. (in Russ.)

Nevskaya I. A. Subject valency of Shor gerunds. In: Johanson L. et al. (eds.). The Mainz Meeting: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Turkish Linguistics. August 3–6. 1994. Wiesbaden, Harrassowitz, 1998, p. 234–243.

Nevskaya I. Converbs as depictive secondary predicates in South Siberian Turkic. In: Boeschoten H., Rentzsch J. (eds.). Turcology in Mainz. Wiesbaden, Harrassowitz, 2010, p. 91–200. (Turcologica 80)

Nevskaya I. Depictive secondary predicates in South Siberian Turkic. In: Schroeder Ch. et al. (eds.). Secondary predicates in Eastern European languages and beyond. Oldenburg, BIS-Verlag der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, 2008, p. 275– 295. (Studia Slavica Oldenburgensia. 16)

Nevskaya I. A. Converbs as secondary resultative predicates in Turkic languages. In: Demir N., Karakoç B., Menz A. (eds.). Turcology and Linguistics. Éva Ágnes Csató Festschrift. Ankara, Hacettepe Üniversiresi Yayınları, 2014, p. 305–313.

Nevskaya I. A. Depiktivnye konstruktsii v yuzhnosibirskikh tyurkskikh yazykakh [Depictive constructions in South Siberian Turkic]. In: Sbornik tezisov dokladov 26 Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii «Dul'zonovskie chteniya» [Proceedings of the 26th International Dulzon Conference]. Tomsk, TSPU Press, 2011, p. 59–64. (in Russ.)

Nevskaya I. A. Formy deeprichastnogo tipa v shorskom yazyke [Forms of converb type in Shor]. Novosibirsk, NSU Press, 1993, 124 p. (in Russ.)

Nevskaya I. A. Sostav i funktsii deeprichastiy v shorskom yazyke [Inventory and functions of converbs Shor]. PhD. Dissertation. Alma-Ata, Institut yazykoznaniya Kaz. SSR, 1990, 244 p. (in Russ.)

Nevskaya I., Tazhibaeva S. Depictive predicates in Kazakh in a comparative perspective. In: The Szeged Conference. Proceedings of the 15th ICTL. Szeged, 2012, p. 331–340.

Nichols J. Secondary predicates. In: Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1978, no. 4, p. 114–127.

Paul H. Deutsche Grammatik. Halle/Saale, 1919. Bd. 3.

Pinkster H. Lateinische Syntax und Semantik. Tübingen, Franke, 1988, 424 S.

Plank F. Prädikativ und Koprädikativ. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 1985, no. 13, p. 154–185.

Schroeder Ch. Depiktive im Sprachvergleich Deutsch-Türkisch. Eine kontrastivtypologische Analyse. Habilitationsschrift. Osnabrück, 2004, 440 S.

Schroeder Ch. et al. (eds.). Secondary predicates in Eastern European languages and beyond. Oldenburg, BIS-Verlag der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, 2008. (Studia Slavica Oldenburgensia. 16)

Schultze-Bernd E., Himmelmann N. P. Depictive secondary predicates in crosslinguistic perspective. Linguistic typology, 2001, no. 8, p. 59–131.

Tybykova A. T. Tipy imennogo skazuemogo v altayskom yazyke [Types of nominal predicates in Altai]. In: Ubryatova E. I. (red.). Komponenty predlozheniya (na materiale yazykov raznykh sistem) [Sentence components (on the material of languages of different systems)]. Novosibirsk, IIFF SO RAN, 1988, p. 52–67. (in Russ.)

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology