Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737
Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics)
По-русски
Archive
Submission requirements
Process for Submission and Publication
Editor′s office
Editorial Board and Editorial Council
Our ethical principles
Search:


Email: silantev@post.nsu.ru

Article

Name: About Closed Morphological Structures

Authors: I. A. Kanakin

Novosibirsk, Russia

Issue 2, 2019Pages 319-326
UDK: 81’366DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737-2019-2-319-326

Abstract: The article deals with the analysis of ‘closed’ morphological systems, containing oppositional and contrastive elements. The category of case in the Slavic languages represents the systems of this kind. An attempt is made to shed light on the meaning of the case category in the Russian language. We argue that neither its semantic nor syntactic explanation are taken as being the only criterion of truth. The formal analysis of this category reveals that there is no relationship of noun case forms and that the structuring of pronoun and noun paradigms is different. Case government through prepositions, widely spread in many languages, also fails to explain case distinctions either from only semantic or syntactic perspective. The distribution of words into parts of speech in various languages still remains the only undoubted and common function for all inflectional case paradigms. We view ‘closed’ derivational and inflectional morphological systems as a fundamental condition in this respect; the character of there structure is of little importance; however, formal and unambiguous description can only be applied to the rigidly structured systems.

Keywords: morphological systems, case, case in Russian, prepositional government, rigid structure

Bibliography:

Barkhudarov L. S. Yazyk i perevod. Moscow, 1975. (in Russ.)

Bedvardsson A. Kratkij ocherk grammatiki islandskogo yazyka. In: Berkov V. P. Islandsko-russkij slovar'. Moscow, 1962. (in Russ.)

Benvenist E. Obshchaya lingvistika. Moscow, 2009. (in Russ.)

Blumfild L. Yazyk. Moscow, 1968. (in Russ.)

Vezhbicka A. Semanticheskie universalii i bazisnye kontsepty. Moscow, 2011. (in Russ.)

Vetrov A. A. Metodologicheskie problemy sovremennoj lingvistiki: ucheb. posobie. Moscow, 1973. (in Russ.)

Zaliznyak A. A. Russkoe imennoe slovoizmenenie. Moscow, 2002. (in Russ.)

Kasevich V. B. Elementy obshhej lingvistiki. Moscow, 1977. (in Russ.)

Kuznetsov N. S. Teoreticheskaya grammatika datskogo yazyka: Morfologiya. Moscow, 1989. (in Russ.)

Lajonz Dzh. Vvedenie v teoreticheskuju lingvistiku. Moscow, 1978. (in Russ.)

Plotkin V. Ya. Grammaticheskie sistemy v anglijskom yazyke. Kishinyov, 1975. (in Russ.)

Plotkin V. Ya. Stroj anglijskogo yazyka: ucheb. posobie. Moscow, 1989. (in Russ.)

Slyusareva N. A. Problemy funktsional'noj morfologii sovremennogo anglijskogo yazyka. Moscow, 1986. (in Russ.)

Fillmor Ch. Delo o padezhe. In: Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. Moscow, 1981, iss. 10: Lingvisticheskaya semantika, p. 369–495.

Blake B. J. Case. Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., Svartvik J. A university grammar of English. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1982.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology