Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737
Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics)
По-русски
Archive
Submission requirements
Process for Submission and Publication
Editor′s office
Editorial Board and Editorial Council
Our ethical principles
Search:


Email: silantev@post.nsu.ru

Article

Name: Is Metaphor Always Just a “Condensed Plot”?

Authors: V. V. Krasnykh

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Issue 2, 2019Pages 194-205
UDK: 81DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737-2019-2-194-205

Abstract: The article contains the results of the analysis of metaphors architectonics in fiction on the example of the story “Systema sobak” (‘Dogs System’) by V. Tokareva. The article begins with a brief presentation of the modern scientific paradigm which is defined as the post-non-classical one (according to V. S. Styopin) and as the stage of neopospositivism. The latter is characterized by holistic and integrative character. The article also mentions different approaches to the study of metaphor (tropic, interactive and cognitive) and specifically specifies the study of metaphor in connection with the artistic text. The aim of the analysis of Tokareva’s text was to identify “hidden” metaphors. The following research methods were used: textological, contextual, conceptual and combinatorial. The article on the specific material proves the need for a comprehensive approach of integrative nature and demonstrates the possibility of its application. The analysis made it possible to consider the surface metaphor reflected in the story title (LOVE is the “host – dog” relationship) and analyze its deployment in the text. It also allowed to reveal “hidden” metaphors: LOVE is height, LOVE is chemistry, LOVE is water, LOVE is light, LOVE is multicolor, brightness, beauty. The given metaphors implicitly presented in the text form the “general” metaphor of a “higher” level: LOVE is ELEMENT OF NATURE, NOT SUBJECT TO MAN. In the end, it is concluded that in the sphere of fiction metaphor is not only a “condensed plot”. It is also something that is not verbalized in the text but is there beyond the text being “dissolved” in the narration. It means that metaphor can also be considered as a “unfolded plot”, which is not always and not necessarily having a specific verbal embodiment in a certain text in the form of a (fixed) expression.

Keywords: metaphor, metaphors architectonics, “condensed plot”, “unfolded plot”, V. Tokareva

Bibliography:

Bakhtin M. M. K problemam metodologii estetiki slovesnogo tvorchestva. I. Problema formy soderzhaniya i materiala v slovesnom khuzhozhestvennom tvorchestve [To the Problems of the Methodology of Aesthetics of Verbal Creativity. I. The Problem of the Form of Content and Material in Verbal and Artwork by the Artist] In: Bakhtin M. M. Sobranie sochinenij [Collected Works]. Moscow, Russkie slovari Publ., 2003, vol. 1, p. 265–325. (in Russ.)

Black M. Metafora. [Metaphor]. In: Teoriya metafory [Metaphor Theory] Moscow, Progress, 1990, p. 153–172. (in Russ.)

Chekan N. I. Dva podkhoda k ponimaniyu metafory: O. M. Freidenberg i M. M. Bakhtin [Two approaches to understanding metaphors: O. M. Freidenberg and M. M. Bakhtin]. Istoricheskaya i sotsial'no-obrazovatel'naya mysl' [Historical and socio- educational thought], 2014, vol. 6, no. 6, part 2, p. 175–178. (in Russ.)

Freidenberg O. M. Poetika syuzheta i zhanra [Poetics of Plot and Genre]. Moscow, Labirint, 1997, 448 p. (in Russ.)

Krasnykh V. V. Novye nauki o cheloveke govoryashchem: otvet na vyzov nashego vremeni. Vstupitel'naya stat'ya [New Disciplines of Homo Loquens: Answer to the Challenge of Our Time. Introductory article] In: Bubnova I. A., Zykova I. V., Krasnykh V. V., Ufimtseva N. V. (Neo)psiholingvistika i (Psiho)lingvokul'turologija: Novye Nauki o Cheloveke Govorjashhem [(Neo)psycholinguistics and (Psycho)linguoculturology: New Sciences about Homo loquens]. Collective Monograph. Ed. by V. V. Krasnykh. Moscow, Gnosis, 2017, p. 6–18. (in Russ.)

Lakoff G. Zhenshchiny, ogon' i opasnye veshchi: Chto kategorii yazyka govoryat nam o myshlenii [Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind]. Transl. from I. V. Shatunovskogo. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoj kul'tury, 2004, 792 p. (in Russ.)

Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem [Metaphors We Live By] Moscow, URSS Editorial, 2004, 256 p. (in Russ.)

Leontiev A. N. Obraz mira [World View]. In: Leontiev A. N. Izbrannye psikhologicheskie proizvedeniya [Selected Psychologic Works]. Moscow, Pedagogika, 1983, p. 251–261. (in Russ.)

Ortega y Gasset J. Dve glavnye metafory. K dvukhsotletiyu Kanta [The Two Great Metaphors. To the Bicentenary of Kant. 1990. URL: https://www.libfox.ru/41051-hoseortega- i-gasset-dve-glavnye-metafory.html (accessed: 27.03.2019). (in Russ.)

Sériot P. Oksyumoron ili nedoponimanie? Universalistskij relyativizm universal'nogo estestvennogo semanticheskogo metayazyka Anny Vezhbickoj [Oxymoron or Misunderstanding? Universalistic Relativism of the Universal Natural Semantic Metalanguage of Anna Wierzbicka]. Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political Linguistics], 2011, no. 1 (35), p. 30–41. (in Russ.)

Sinitskaya A. V. Prostranstvennost' i metaforicheskij syuzhet: Na materiale proizvedenij S. Krzhizhanovskogo i K. Vaginova [Spatial and Metaphorical Plot: Based on the Works of S. Krzhizhanovsky and K. Vaginov]. Dis. … cand. philol. nauk. Samara, 2004, 202 p. (in Russ.)

Styopin V. S. Klassika, neklassika, postneklassika: kriterii razlicheniya [Classics, Non-Classics, Post-Non-Classics: Criteria for Distinguishing]. In: Postneklassika: filosofiya, nauka, kul'tura [Post-Non-Classics: Philosophy, Science, Culture]. St. Petersburg, Mir Publ., 2009, p. 249–295. (in Russ.)

Teliya V. N. Metafora v jazyke i tekste [Metaphor in Language and Text]. Moscow, Nauka, 1990, 174 p. (in Russ.)

Teliya V. N. Metaforizatsiya i ee rol' v sozdanii jazykovoj kartiny mira [Metaphorization and It’s Role in the Creation of a Language Picture of the World] In: Serebrennikov B. A., Kubryakova E. S., Postovalova V. K., Teliya V. N., Ufimtseva A. A. Rol' chelovecheskogo faktora v yazyke: Yazyk i kartina mira [The Role of Human Factor in Language: Language and World View]. Ed. by B. A. Serebrennikov. Moscow, Nauka, 1988, p. 173–203. (in Russ.)

Thorndyke P. W. Cognitive Structures in Comprehension and Memory of Narrative Discourse. Cognitive Psychology. 1977, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 77–110. DOI 10.1016/0010- 0285(77)90005-6.

Zykova I. V. Kontseptosfera kul'tury i frazeologiya: Teoriya i metody lingvokul'turologicheskogo izucheniya [The Conceptual Sphere of Culture and Phraseology: Theory and Methods of Linguocultural Study]. Moscow, Lenand Publ., 2015, 380 p. (in Russ.)

Zykova I. V. Pertseptsiya i frazeologicheskij znak v svete (psiho)lingvokul'turologicheskogo podkhoda [Perception and Phraseological Sign in the Light of (Psycho) Linguoculturological approach] In: Bubnova I. A., Zykova I. V., Krasnykh V. V., Ufimtseva N. V. (Neo)psiholingvistika i (Psiho)lingvokul'turologija: Novye Nauki o Cheloveke Govorjashhem [(Neo)psycholinguistics and (Psycho)linguoculturology: New Sciences about Homo loquens]. Collective Monograph. Ed. by V. V. Krasnykh. Moscow, Gnosis, 2017, p. 262–342. (in Russ.)

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology