Article

Name: The Categories of Author – Text – Reader in the Novel “Librarian” by Michael Elizarov

Authors: E. G. Nikolaeva

Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

Abstract: The article deals with the categories of Author – Text – Reader in the novel «Librarian» by Michael Elizarov. Consideration of this novel as well “The Slynx” by Tatyana Tolstaya shows general trends of modern narratives such as the placement of these categories in the eschatological context of postmodern culture, the debunking of the bibliophilic cultural myth, desacralization of literature, leveling the quality of reading, the transformation of the latter into the reader’s consumption of “literary product”). The author focuses on the meta-literature “discussion” of these categories in the novel by Elizarov. An important point is that the some of literary concepts and conventions are parodied and reduced to absurdity such as the ratio of content and expression, the question of the integrity of the piece; the concept of the Author’s Death, etc.). So, the category of the Text at first is represented by the writer as not depending on the dead author Gromov (in according with ideas of Alexander Potebnja or Roland Bart). The meanings produced by books by Gromov are not connected with the text of his works. But at the same time the reader’s perception appears secondary “due to the object of perception” (Alexander Skaftymov). The expression of the author’s will in the novel is expressed through the “pathos” which is a single emotional setting of each Gromov’s book (Books of Power, Memory, Meaning, etc.), which can influence readers through various readings. The article states the specificity of understanding in “Gromov’s Universe” the Composition of the Piece, which consist of not only constructive parts but also includes just technical elements (font, layout, editors’ names, insert with typos), The structure of this “universal” is examined as social pyramid, status of readers and libraries, authorities, etc. structures. Also the article reveals the contrast between the external “official world” (police, government, public organizations, etc.) and the “world of the initiates” (readers), as well as methods of creating groups of characters belonging to different worlds. Another important point of this research is analysis of connections with ancient folklore and literary tradition (the image of Alex Votintseva is matched with the image of ancient Russian scribes, and the Chronicles of Gromov’s world and “Chronicle of the House the elderly” are compared with Old Russian Chronicles). It should be mentioned some observations concerning the intertextual relations of the novel and its mythopoetic context. The article discusses the issue of the mode of artistry in the final of the novel, analyzes the combination of the functions of the Reader and the Author in the main character.

Keywords: Michael Elizarov, Librarian, author, text, reader, metaliterature, metaliterature, eschatological motifs, bibliophilic myth, the death of the author, the modus of artistry, pathos, mythopoetics, literary tradition, intertextual relations, intertextuality

Bibliography:

Barthes R. Izbrannye raboty. Semiotika. Poetika. Transl. from France. Ed. by G. K. Kosikov. Moscow, Progress, 1989, 616 p. (in Russ.)

Elizarov M. Bibliotekar. Roman. Moscow, Ad Marginem, 2007, 448 p. (in Russ.)

Grin A. S. Sobranie sochineniy. In 6 vols. Moscow, Pravda, vol. 6, 496 p. (in Russ.)

Khalizev V. E. Teoriya literatury. Moscow, HS Publ., 1999, 398 p. (in Russ.)

Khanov B. A. Svoeobrazie funktsionirovaniya sovetskogo diskursa v romane M. Yu. Elizarova “Bibliotekar’”. Uchyonye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki, 2015, vol. 157, no. 2, p. 229–238. URL: https:// cyber-leninka.ru/article/n/svoeobrazie-funktsionirovaniya-sovetskogo-diskursa-vromane-m-yu-elizarova-bibliotekar (accessed 20.08.2018). (in Russ.)

Kraev N. Mikhail Elizarov: ya byl za krasnykh! Postimees, 2011. URL: https://rus.postimees.ee/409646/mihail-elizarov-ya-byl-by-za-krasnyh (accessed 20.08.2018). (in Russ.)

Mify narodov mira. Entsiklopediya. In 2 vols. Ed. by S. A. Tokarev. Moscow, Rossiyskaya entsiklopediya, vol. 2, 719 p. (in Russ.)

Molitvoslov na vsyakuyu potrebu in a vsyakiy den. Satis. St. Petersburg, 2001, 627 p. (in Russ.)

Pasternak B. L. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. In 11 vols. Coll. E. B. Pasternak, E. V. Pasternak, introduction by L. S. Fleishman. Moscow, SLOVO, 2003, vol. 1, 576 p. (in Russ.)

Poetika. Slovar aktualnykh terminov i ponyatiy. Ed. by N. D. Tamarchenko. Moscow, Kulagina Publ., Intrada, 2008, 358 p. (in Russ.)

Potebnya A. A. Estetika i poetika. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 1976, 614 p. (in Russ.)

Shakirov S. M. Diskurs literaturnoy kritiki i ego transformatsii. Diskurs-Pi, 2013, no. 1–2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/diskurs-literaturnoy-kritiki-iego-transformatsii (accessed 16.08.2018). (in Russ.)

Skaftymov A. P. Poetika khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya. Coll. V. V. Prozorov, Yu. N. Borisov, introduction by V. V. Prozorov. Moscow, HS Publ., 2007. 535 p. (Klassika literaturnoy nauki) (in Russ.)

Strukova T. G. Labirinty Kh. L. Borkhesa i U. Eko. URL: http://esp-centr. sfedu.ru/documents_centr/conf/Strukova.pdf (accessed 20.08.2018). (in Russ.)

Tikhanov G. Zametki o dispute formalistov i marksistov 1927 goda. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2001, no. 50, p. 279–286. (in Russ.)

Tolstaya T. N. Kys’. Roman. Moscow, Podkova, 2002, 320 p. (in Russ.)

Turysheva O. N. Archetype Grail in M. Yelizarov’s Novel “Librarian”. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2018, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 492–498.

Volynskaya A. G. Biograficheskiy diskurs v russkoy literature 19–20 vekov (ot realisticheskogo romana k modernistskomu). Preprint WP20/2013/02. Moscow, HSE Publ., 2013, 56 p. (Seriya WP20 “Filosofiya i issledovaniya kultury”) (in Russ.)