Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Causative constructions with volitional verbs in the Buryat and Russian languages

Authors: E. A. Dadueva

Buryat Institute of Infocommunications (Branch) of the Siberian State University of Telecommunications and Informatics, Ulan-Ude, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 1, 2020Pages 267-277
UDK: 811DOI: 10.17223/18137083/70/21

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to determine some characteristics of the functioning of causative verbs of volitional influence in the Buryat and Russian languages and to define their place in the verbal system. In the Russian and Buryat languages, causative verbs of emotional, volitional, and physical impact are identified. These verbs constitute an extensive class of content causative verbs in both Russian and Buryat languages, with volitional impact being expressed only by a small group of verbs: dat’, pozvolit’, zastavit’, prikazat’, velet’, prosit’, prinuzhdat’ (to give, to allow, to force, to order, to request, to coerce), etc. Semantically, their main characteristic is the designation of a potential, desired, causal action in the Russian language by means of an infinitive, and in the Buryat language – a participle. We consider the verbs of volitional action as auxiliary for the formation of syntactic causative constructions, i. e. functioning as a syntactic causative in the Russian language. This group of volitional verbs is a special group of causative verbs possessing a number of features that make them different from the causative verbs of physical and emotional impact. Their distinctive features are the absence of non-causal correlates in Russian and Buryat languages and some grammatical differences. The characteristic feature of the Buryat language is the possibility of expressing a volitional impact with one lexeme, not common in the Russian language. We have also noted that auxiliary causative verbs can lose the volitional meaning when combined with an inanimate causer and an inanimate object of influence.

Keywords: causative verb, polypredicative construction, volitional impact, factitive causation, permissive causation

Bibliography:

Apresyan Yu. D. Izbr. tr. T. 1: Leksicheskaya semantika [Selected works. Vol. 1: Lexical semantics]. Moscow, 1995, 472 р.

Arutyunova N. D. Predlozhenie i ego smysl [The sentence and its meaning]. Moscow, 1976, 383 p.

Gordon E. Ya. Kauzativnye glagoly v sovremennom russkom yazyke [Causative verbs in modern Russian]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Moscow, 1981.

Dadueva E. A. Kauzativnye affiksy v buryatskom yazyke [Causative affixes in the Buryat language]. BSU bulletin. Language. Literature. Culture. 2014, no.1, рр. 4–8 .

Dadueva E. A. Funktsional’no-semanticheskaya kategoriya kauzativnosti v russkom i buryatskom yazykakh [Functional-semantic category of causativity in Russian and Buryat languages]. Ulan-Ude, 2011, 128 р.

Distanova G. M. Tipologiya konstruktsiy s kauzativnymi glagolami v russkom yazyke [Typology of constructions with causative verbs in Russian]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Dushanbe, 2010.

Filippov A. V. K voprosu o kauzativnyh i nekauzativnyh glagolah [On the question of causative and non-causative verbs]. Russkiy yazyk v shkole. 1978, no. 1, рр. 90–93.

Kasevich V. B., Khrakovskiy V. S. Konstruktsii s predikatnymi aktantami. Problemy semantiki [Constructions with predicate actants. Problems of semantics]. In: Kategorii glagola i struktura predlozheniya: konstruktsii s predikatnymi aktantami: Sb. st. [Verb categories and sentence structure: constructions with predicate actants: Coll. of art.]. V. S. Khrakovskiy (Ed.). Leningrad, 1983, рр. 5–27.

Katsnel’son S. D. Tipologiya yazyka i rechevoe myshlenie [Typology of language and speech thinking]. Moscow, 2002.

Noonan M. Complementation In: Shopen T. (Ed.). Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 2: Complex constructions. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 52–150.

Skribnik E. K. Polipredikativnye sinteticheskie predlozheniya v buryatskom yazyke (struk- turno-semanticheskoe opisanie) [Polypredicative synthetic sentences in the Buryat language]. Novosibirsk, 1988, 199 p.

Tipologiya konstruktsiy s predikatnymi aktantami [Typology of constructions with predicate actants]. Leningrad, 1985, 232 p.

Van Tsuy, Bochina T. G. Kauzativnaya konstruktsiya v russkom i kitayskom yazykakh [The causative construction in Russian and Chinese languages]. Philology and Сulture. 2014, no. 3 (37), рр.7–11.

Zolotova G. A., Onipenko N. K., Sidorova M. Yu. Kommunikativnaya grammatika russkogo yazyka [Communicative grammar of the Russian language]. Moscow, 2004, 544 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology