Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Food intake situation as a conceptual basis for phraseme formation in Russian and English languages

Authors: O. V. Avramenko, E. A. Yurina

Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russian Federation; Pushkin State Russian Language Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 1, 2020Pages 229-244
UDK: 81’371DOI: 10.17223/18137083/70/18

Abstract: The consideration is given to the propositional-frame structure of food intake situation as the cognitive basis of phraseme formation in Russian and English languages. Figurative words and expressions metaphorically motivated by the verbs est’, zhrat’, kusat’, gryzt’, zhevat’ and glotat’ in Russian and eat, bite, chew and swallow in English are analyzed. Their speech usage in Russian and English literary and journalistic texts is studied. Phraseological units reflecting food intake metaphors are systematized in terms of the semantics of the source image captured in the inner form of the idiom and are structured into motivational-figurative paradigms of phraseological representations of this source image. The study describes the methodology of identifying the bases of metaphorical projections underlying the phraseme formation. This methodology involves three stages: 1. Analysis of semantics, inner form, and discourse functioning of phraseological units; 2. Presentation of typical figurative representations common to certain linguistic culture; 3. Identification of metaphorical mappings basis demonstrating the abstractive propositional scheme. The analysis resulted in the description of 11 universal typical figurative representations attributed to Russian and English (British and American) linguistic cultures. The following con- ceptual grounds were revealed: a) placement or concealment of an object within a confined space; b) loss, disappearance of an object; c) filling of space; d) deformation, complete destruction of an object as a result of breakdown; e) receiving, purchasing an object to meet the need for some- thing. The food intake images presented in the semantics of phraseological units are used in two languages under analysis for characterizing interpersonal relations, the influence of negative emotions on the human psyche, speech impact, competitive situations, gaining financial and material benefits, intensive labor activity.

Keywords: phraseme formation, cognitive metaphor, gastronomic metaphor, language world- view

Bibliography:

Alefirenko N. F. Frazeologiya v svete sovremennyh lingvisticheskih paradigm [Phraseology in the light of modern linguistic paradigms]. Moscow, “Elpis” Publ., 2008, 271 p.

Arutyunova N. D. Predlozhenie i ego smysl: logiko-semanticheskie problemy [The sentence and its meaning: logical-semantic problems]. Moscow, Nauka, 1976, 383 p.

Baranov A. N. Dobrovol’skiy D. O. Aspekty teorii frazeologii [Aspects of phraseology theory]. Мoscow, Znak, 2008, 656 p.

Baranov A. N. Ocherk kognitivnoy teorii metafory. Russkaya politicheskaya metafora (materialy k slovaryu) [Essay of cognitive theory of metaphor. Russian political metaphor (Materials for the dictionary)]. Moscow, 1991, pp. 184–193.

Blinova O. I. Yavlenie motivacii slov: Leksikologicheskij aspekt [The phenomenon of words motivation: Lexicological aspect]. Tomsk, 1984, 192 p.

Boychuk A. S. “Pishchevye” metafory kak sposob harakteristiki sovremennoj dejstvitel'nosti [“Food” metaphors as a way of characterizing modern reality]. Sochi Journal of Economy. 2012, no. 1 (19), pp. 178–181.

Chudinov A. P. Metaforicheskaya mozaika v sovremennoy politicheskoy kommunikatsii. 2-e izd., stereotip. [Metaphorical mosaic in modern political communication: monograph. 2nd ed. stereot.]. Ekaterinburg, USPU, 2005, 257 p.

Fillmor Ch. Freymy i semantika ponimaniya [Frames and semantics of understanding]. In: Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike [New in foreign linguistics]. 1988, no. 23, pp. 52–93.

Gibbs R. W. Why idioms are not dead metaphors. Idioms: processing, structure, and interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993, pp. 57–77.

Gibbs R. W. Jr. The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press, 2008, 564 p.

Glucksberg S. Understanding figurative language: from metaphors to idioms. New York, Oxford University Press, 2001, 134 p.

Ilyukhina N. A. Metaforicheskiy obraz v semasiologicheskoy interpretatsii [Metaphorical image in semasiological interpretation]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka, 2010, 321 p.

Kovshova M. L. Analiz frazeologizmov i kody kul'tury [Phraseological analysis and culture codes]. The Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Studies in Literature and Language. 2008, no. 67 (2), pp. 60–65.

Kövecses Z. Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York, Oxford University Press, 2002, 285 p.

Kubryakova E. S. Glagoly deystviya cherez ikh kognitivnye kharakteristiki [Action verbs through their cognitive characteristics]. Logicheskiy analiz yazyka: Modeli deystviya. Мoscow, 1992, pp. 84–90.

Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1980, 256 p.

Lebedeva N. B. Polisituativnost’ glagol’noy semantiki (na materiale russkikh prefiksal’nykh glagolov) [The polysituation of verb semantics (based on Russian prefixal verbs)]. Tomsk, TSU Publ., 1999, 262 p.

Maximova T. V. Gastronomicheskaya metafora v raznyh tipah diskursa [Gastronomic meta- phor in different types of discourse]. Vestnik of Pushkin LSU. 2013, iss. 4, vol. 1, pp. 176–181.

Minskiy M. Freymy dlya predstavleniya znaniy [Knowledge frames]. Moscow, Energiya, 1979, 151 p.

Mishankina N. A. Metafora v nauke: paradoks ili norma? [Metaphor in science: paradox or norm?]. Tomsk, TSU Publ., 2010, 282 p.

Nayak N. P., Gibbs R. W. Conceptual knowledge in the interpretation of idioms. Journal of experimental psychology: general. 1990, no. 119, pp. 115–130.

Teliya V. N. Russkaya frazeologiya. Semanticheskiy, pragmaticheskiy i lingvo-kul’turologicheskiy aspekty [Russian phraseology. Semantic, pragmatic and linguocultural aspects]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 1996, 285 p.

Yurina E. A. Obraznyy stroy yazyka [The figurative structure of language]. Tomsk, TSU Publ., 2005, 156 p.

Yurina E. A. Vkusnye metafory: pishchevaya tradiciya v zerkale yazykovyh obrazov [Tasty metaphors: food tradition in the mirror of language images]. Kokshetau, 2013, 238 p.

Yurina E. A., Zhivago N. A. Metaforizaciya pogloshcheniya pishchi v obraznom stroe russkogo yazyka [Metaphorization of food absorption in the Russian language figurative system]. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2015, no. 3 (35), pp. 107–121.

Zhivago N. A. Semantika i pragmatika glagol’noj metafory edy (na materiale semanticheskoj gruppy “Pogloshchenie pishchi pri pomoshchi zubov”) [Semantics and pragmatics of the verbal food metaphor (based on the material of the semantic group “Food absorption with the help of teeth”)]. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2017, no. 4 (72), pp. 167–174.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology