Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737
Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 
Critique and Semiotics
По-русски
Archive
Submission requirements
Process for Submission and Publication
Editor′s office
Editorial Board and Editorial Council
Our ethical principles
Search:


Email: silantev@post.nsu.ru

Article

Name: “Anna Karenina” – of Dostoevsky. The Incident of Rhetoric

Authors: Yurii V. Shatin

Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

Issue 2, 2023Pages 292-301
UDK: 882DOI: 10.25205/2307-1753-2023-2-292-301

Abstract:

The article considers a special case of rhetoric in which the discourse invented by the author gains illocutionary power over the creator and begins to dictate speech strategies and narratives that do not agree with previous intentions and completely change the author’s ideas about goals and objectives of artistic whole. Among such cases is the interpretation of Levin’s image in eighth part of “Anna Karenina”, which was reflected in Dostoevsky’s “Diary of Writer” for 1877. The discourse of war inventing by Dostoevsky was used to justify the Russian – Turkish operation and thereby came into conflict with the discourse of misunderstanding of the nature of war, characteristic of Tolstoy. The desire to condemn the position of protagonist of Tolstoy’s novel forced Dostoevsky to abandon the most principle of his artistic thinking and poetics associated with polyphony and use rhetoric techniques that are questionable from the point of the validity.

Keywords: “Diary of writer”, “Anna Karenina”, rhetoric, discourse, narrative, interpretation

Bibliography:

Bartes R. Voyna yazykov [The war of languages]. In: Bartes R. Izbrannnye raboty. Semiotika. Poetika. Moscow, 1989, pp. 535–540. (in Russ.)

Herlt J. “Na kakom rasstoyanii zakanchivaetsya chelovekolubie?”: Tolstoy i Dostoevsky v 1877 godu: sotsial’naya epistemologya romana [“At what distance does humanity end?”: Tolstoy and Dostoevsky in 1877: the social epistemology of the novel]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2019, no. 1 (155), pp. 42–61. (in Russ.)

Kazakov A. A. “Zashchitniki brat’ev-slavyn” i polemika o nikh v “Anne Kareninoy” L. N. Tolstogo i “Dnevnike pisatelya” F. M. Dostoevskogo [“The defenders of Slavic brothers” and controversy about them in L. N. Tolstoy’s “Anna Karenina” and F. M. Dostoevsky’s “The writer’s diary”]. Imagologia i komparativistika, 2016, no. 1 (5), pp. 52–63. (in Russ.)

Sharakov S. L. Roman “Anna Karenina” v vospriyatii Dostoevskogo: simvolicheskiy aspect [The novel “Anna Karenina” in the perception of Dostoevsky: symbolic aspect]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2015, no. 11, pt. 3, pp. 212–218. (in Russ.)

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology