Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737
Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 
Critique and Semiotics
По-русски
Archive
Submission requirements
Process for Submission and Publication
Editor′s office
Editorial Board and Editorial Council
Our ethical principles
Search:


Email: silantev@post.nsu.ru

Article

Name: Ekphrasis as a Semiotic Experiment

Authors: E. E. Brazgovskaya

Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University (Perm, Russian Federation)

Issue 1, 2020Pages 52-72
UDK: 165.6 + 81-114.2DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737-2020-1-52-72

Abstract: This article is focusing on two cognitive-semiotic processes: verbal representation of physical world objects and reverse translation of a sign into a thing – on creation of mental pictures based on verbal descriptions. Simultaneously, we study the cognitive-semiotic phenomenon of reading: the degree of certainty of mental images and their reliability which are determined by semiotic techniques of representation. The object of analysis are series of verbal pictures – representations of a work of art in Goran Petrovich’s novel “Atlas Composed by Sky”. The iconism of ekphrasis is the basis for the creation of gestalt paintings. According to the degree of iconism, there are distinguished the “absolute” copies (reproductions of pages of books and letters); ekphrasis in the form of a list of picture’s characters (icons as a schemes) and representations which creates the effect of “animated” or “living” pictures – like cinema images. The other side of the word is the image of another modality. The hidden multilingualism of verbal representations (for example, a visual image behind the verbal signs) explains why we not only see our mental images, but also hear, smell them and can touch their objects. So, the process of reading is based on working with «cognitive tango» of languages (L. Zbikowsky), where verbal system is presented in the current mode, while the visual image has a mental nature. This phenomenon of consciousness becomes the reason that missing (in direct perception) art objects become “real”. The possibility of a symbolic interpretation of mental images in the contexts of intellectual history allows us to define ekfrasis as more creative than mimetic practice.

Keywords: ekphrasis, mental image, representation, multimodal coding, semiotic certainty, Goran Petrovich

Bibliography:

Berger J. Iskusstvo videt’. Transl. from Eng. by E. Schraga. St. Petersburg, Cloudberry, 2012, 184 p. (in Russ.)

Brazgovskaya E. V labirintach semiotyki. Ocherki i etyudy po obschey semiotyke i semiotyke soznaniya. Moscow, Ekaterinburg, Cabinet scientist Publ., 2018, 224 p. (in Russ.)

Calvert G. (ed.) The Handbook of Multisensory Processes. Cambridge, London, MIT Press, 2004, 915 р.

Cassin B. (ed.) Image. In: Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon. Trans. by S. Rendall. Princeton, Oxford, Princeton University Press, 2014, p. 478–479.

Clüver C. Quotation, Enargeia, and the Functions of Ekphrasis. Pictures into Words: Theoretical and Descriptive Approaches to Ekphrasis. Eds. V. Robillard and E. Jongeneel. Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit UP, 1998, p. 35–52.

Elkins J. (ed.) Visual Literacy. New York, Routledge, 2009, 228 р.

Inischev I. Ikonicheskiy povorot v teoriyach kultury i obschestva. Logos, 2012, no. 1 (85), p. 184–211. (in Russ.)

Kalvino I. Esli odnazhdy zimnej nochyu putnik... Trans. from Ital. by G. Kiselyova. Moscow, AST, 2019, 352 p. (in Russ.)

Killander C., Lutas С. L. A New Look on Ekphrasis: An Eye-tracking Experiment on a Cinematic Example. Ekphrasis. Images, Cinema, Theatre, Media, 2014, vol. 12 (2), p. 10–31.

Klarer M. Ekphrasis. In: Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. Ed. by D. Herman. London, Routledge, 2005, p. 133–134.

Krieger M. Ekphrasis: The Illusion of the Natural Sign. Baltimore, London, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992, 292 p.

Kundera M. Bessmertiye. Trans. from Chech by N. Schulginf. St. Petersburg, Azbuka-Klassika, 2005, 384 p.

Leeuwen Theo van. Multimodality and Multimodal Research. In: The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. Eds. Eric Margolis & Luc Pauwels. Sage, 2011, p. 549–570.

Marinyon Zh.-L. Perekrestya vidimogo. Trans. from Fr. N. Sosna. Moscow, Progress-Traditsyia, 2010, 176 p. (in Russ.)

Melnikova-Grigoryeva E. Otnoscheniye slowa k obrazu kak bazovyi mechanizm poznajushhego soznaniya. In: “Nievyrazimo vyrazimoye”: ekfrasis i problemy representatsyi visualnogo v khudozhestviennom tekstie. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozreniye, 2013, p. 113–130. (in Russ.)

Mendelsund P. Chto my vidim, kogda chitaem: fenomenologicheskoe issledovaniye z illustratsyнami. Trans. from Eng. by L. Tronina. Moscow, AST CORPUS Publ., 2016, 448 p. (in Russ.)

Mitchell W. J. T. Four Fundamental Concepts of Image Science. In: Visual Literacy. Ed. by J. Elkins. New York, London, Sage, 2009, p. 14–21.

Mitchell W. J. T. Image science: iconology, visual culture, and media aesthetics. Chicago, London, The University of Chicago Press, 2015, 244 p.

Mitchell W. J. T. Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1994, 464 p.

Mitchell W. J. T. Showing seeing: a critique of visual culture. Journal of Visual Culture, 2002, vol. 1 (2), p. 165–181.

Mitchell W. J. T. What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images. The University of Chicago Press, 2005, 380 p.

Mitchell W. J. T. What Is an Image? New Literary History, 1984, vol. 15, no. 3: Image / Imago / Imagination, p. 503–537.

Mondzain J.-M. What Does Seeing an Image Mean? Journal of Visual Culture, 2010, vol. 9, p. 307–315.

Nemerov Н. The Painter Dreaming in the Scholar’s House. In: The Collected Poems of Howard Nemerov. The University of Chicago Press, 2015, р. 432–436.

Pavich M. Biografiya Belgrada. Trans. from Serb. L. Savelyeva. St. Petersburg, Palmira, 2017, 319 p. (in Russ.)

Petrovich G. Atlas sostavlennyj nebom. Trans. from Serb. by L. Savelyeva. St. Petersburg, Palmira, 2018, 312 p. (in Russ.)

Petrovich G. Osada tserkvi sviatogo Spasa. Trans. from Serb. by L. Savelyeva. St. Petersburg, Amfora, 2005, 510 p. (in Russ.)

Petrovich G. Atlas opisan nebom. Novi-Sad, Matitsa srpska Publ., 1993, 311 p. (in Serb.)

Petrovskaya E. Teoriya obraza. Moscow, RSHU, 2010, 281 p. (in Russ.)

Pink S. A Multisensory Approach to Visual Methods. In: The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. Ed. by E. Margolis & L. Pauwels. Sage, 2011, p. 601–615.

Rose G. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. 3 rd ed. London, Sage, 2012, 240 p.

Tokarczuk O. Bieguni. Kraków, Wydawnictwo literackie, 2007, 450 s. (in Pol.)

Woodrow R. Rеading pictures: the impossible dream. Analysis and Meta- physics, 2010, vol. 9, p. 62–75.

Yampolskiy M. “Skwoz tuskloje steklo”: 20 glav o nieopredelonnosti. Mos- cow, Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye, 2010, 688 p. (in Russ.)

Zenkin S. Semiotika zritelnogo obraza: Ronald Bart i Yury Lotman. In:

Zenkin S. Raboty o teoriyi. Moscow, Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye, 2012, p. 262–274. (in Russ.)

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology